FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist  Chat Chat  UsergroupsUsergroups  CalendarCalendar RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Photoshopped images & BBC hypocrisy

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    9/11, 7/7 & the War on Freedom Forum Index -> London Bombings of Thursday 7th July 2005
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Ed
Minor Poster
Minor Poster


Joined: 29 May 2006
Posts: 11
Location: Geneva, Switzerland

PostPosted: Sat Nov 08, 2008 3:32 pm    Post subject: Photoshopped images & BBC hypocrisy Reply with quote

I was not sure where to post this; The BBC this week have posted an article about the North Korean leader and a possible fake photo. See :-

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/7715458.stm

Given that the BBC, after writing this must after all now know what a fake photo is. Their position and role are made much clearer regarding the London bombings now that we know they are still responsible for publishing the following link we we know is certainly fake:-

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/shared/spl/hi/uk/05/london_blasts/investigatio n/html/introduction.stm (3rd photo down)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Henry Wilson
Minor Poster
Minor Poster


Joined: 10 Sep 2007
Posts: 15

PostPosted: Sat Nov 08, 2008 5:24 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The BBC have reproduced the cctv picture as supplied by the Met Police in good faith that it is legit. Therefore your critism of the BBC is not a valid one.

It has be claimed by many people that the cctv picture of the alleged bombers is faked but noone to my knowledge has actually provided a competant study of the image to prove the case. And as the cctv video containing this picture has been released a few months ago and is of a better quality, the case for fakery is not well established.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
scubadiver
Validated Poster
Validated Poster


Joined: 26 Apr 2006
Posts: 1843
Location: Currently Andover

PostPosted: Sat Nov 08, 2008 6:30 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I don't consider the photo of the alleged bombers to be faked.
_________________
Currently working on a new website
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
TonyGosling
Editor
Editor


Joined: 25 Jul 2005
Posts: 12316
Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England

PostPosted: Sat Nov 08, 2008 9:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Is this the one you mean?
I'm undecided but it does look photoshopped.
Has code inside which shows it has at least been through photoshop processing. Could have been simply cropped though?


http://cms.met.police.uk/news/major_operational_announcements/terroris t_attacks/police_investigation_continues_into_the_7_7_bombings

Ops in Disarray Over London Bombs Probe
http://wagnews.blogspot.com/2005/07/ops-in-disarray-over-london-bombs. html

_________________
www.rethink911.org
www.actorsandartistsfor911truth.org
www.mediafor911truth.org
www.pilotsfor911truth.org
www.mp911truth.org
www.ae911truth.org
www.rl911truth.org
www.stj911.org
www.l911t.com
www.v911t.org
www.thisweek.org.uk
www.abolishwar.org.uk
www.elementary.org.uk
www.radio4all.net/index.php/contributor/2149
http://utangente.free.fr/2003/media2003.pdf
"The maintenance of secrets acts like a psychic poison which alienates the possessor from the community" Carl Jung
https://37.220.108.147/members/www.bilderberg.org/phpBB2/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
paul wright
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 26 Sep 2005
Posts: 2651
Location: Sunny Bradford, Northern Lights

PostPosted: Sat Nov 08, 2008 11:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Uh? Come on! It's long been established that this still is totally corrupt in every aspect
Other than having a singular Hasib in frame like the only other two cctv images that day
Scubadiver believes this is real? ffs

_________________
http://www.exopolitics-leeds.co.uk/introduction
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Henry Wilson
Minor Poster
Minor Poster


Joined: 10 Sep 2007
Posts: 15

PostPosted: Sat Nov 08, 2008 11:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Paul,
It has never been established that the picture is fake. Over and over I have seen people claim it to be fake but none have yet made a competant case for it. And so you are doing just the same in claiming fakery without providing evidence. As you believe it to be fake please state your reasons why.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
paul wright
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 26 Sep 2005
Posts: 2651
Location: Sunny Bradford, Northern Lights

PostPosted: Sun Nov 09, 2008 1:33 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Henry Wilson wrote:
Paul,
It has never been established that the picture is fake. Over and over I have seen people claim it to be fake but none have yet made a competant case for it. And so you are doing just the same in claiming fakery without providing evidence. As you believe it to be fake please state your reasons why.

Oh - the wrong time frame, when measured against everything else in the story, the poles in front of arm,and bleeding into faces, the wrong reflection, the seeming incorrectness of wet and dry areas, the cropping out of another available image, the smudging of three facial images, the clarity of a dry-run cctv compared to this
This is an utter and complete obvious nonsense and I cannot believe it's a matter of contention
Total and utter nonsense evidence of the official story - at least that is evident?

_________________
http://www.exopolitics-leeds.co.uk/introduction
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
scubadiver
Validated Poster
Validated Poster


Joined: 26 Apr 2006
Posts: 1843
Location: Currently Andover

PostPosted: Sun Nov 09, 2008 6:01 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Henry Wilson wrote:
Paul,
As you believe it to be fake please state your reasons why.


ditto!

_________________
Currently working on a new website
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
numeral
Validated Poster
Validated Poster


Joined: 23 Dec 2005
Posts: 500
Location: South London

PostPosted: Sun Nov 09, 2008 3:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Don't forget Tanweer's trousers. As the Home Office narrative pointed out:
Quote:
The Micra stops at Woodall Services on the M1 to fill up with petrol. Tanweer goes in to pay. He is wearing a white T-shirt, dark jacket, white tracksuit bottoms and a baseball cap.

.....

Tanweer is now wearing dark tracksuit bottoms. There is no explanation for this change at present.

_________________
Follow the numbers
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Henry Wilson
Minor Poster
Minor Poster


Joined: 10 Sep 2007
Posts: 15

PostPosted: Sun Nov 09, 2008 4:15 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

paul wright wrote:
Oh - the wrong time frame, when measured against everything else in the story, the poles in front of arm,and bleeding into faces, the wrong reflection, the seeming incorrectness of wet and dry areas, the cropping out of another available image, the smudging of three facial images, the clarity of a dry-run cctv compared to this
This is an utter and complete obvious nonsense and I cannot believe it's a matter of contention
Total and utter nonsense evidence of the official story - at least that is evident?

Paul,
A case for fakery has to consider the distortions which arise from the composite video signal, analogue video tape and the jpeg compression. The distortions in this picture are severe and unless understood a competant examination of the picture cannot be undertaken.

The faces show no sign of deliberate smudging but are subject to the low resolution of the cctv system and to the loss of detail caused by the jpeg compression.

There is a great loss of detail in the reflection due to the jpeg compression. The resultant distortions within each macro block forms an incoherant image which cannot be judged.

The clarity of the so called 'dummy run' cctv is no better but the colour content is better due to the brighter light.

The railing is not in front of the arm. This is part of the wall behind and not the arm.

The railing bleeding into the face is an illusion. The cheek bone is at the level of the railing and appears to be joining the railing. However the railing is on an incline to the left and so if this was the railing passing through the face then the brightness of the pixels above the line of the cheek bone would be brighter.

Unless you know the time as set in the cctv system it is impossible to use the timestamp as an indication of the actual time the cctv image was recorded.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
numeral
Validated Poster
Validated Poster


Joined: 23 Dec 2005
Posts: 500
Location: South London

PostPosted: Sun Nov 09, 2008 5:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Concerning jpeg compression an uncompressed image must exist. However:
Quote:
Freedom of Information Request Reference No: 2006120002592

I write in connection with your request for information which was received by the Metropolitan Police Service (MPS). I note you seek access to the following information:

* Request that the uncompressed image be released. All files possessed by the Metropolitan Police Service, in whatever format, from which the released image was derived, be released. .




DECISION

Having located and considered the relevant information, I am afraid that I am not required by statute to release the information requested. This letter serves as a Refusal Notice under Section 17 of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (the Act).

REASONS FOR DECISION

Section 17 of the Act provides:

(1) A public authority which, in relation to any request for information, is to any extent relying on a claim that any provision in part II relating to the duty to confirm or deny is relevant to the request or on a claim that information is exempt information must, within the time for complying with section 1(1), give the applicant a notice which-

(a) states the fact,
(B) specifies the exemption in question, and
© states (if that would not otherwise be apparent) why the
exemption applies.

Harm

In considering whether or not this information should be disclosed, I have considered the potential HARM that could be caused by disclosure:

The following areas of Harm are judged relevant:

Proper judicial process (long established legal processes exist through which access to relevant material is achieved - CPIA, civil discovery, etc.). FOIA access should not usurp those processes.

The above exemptions are Class-based absolute exemptions. Where information falls within these categories it is exempt from disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act.

Section 30: Investigations And Proceedings Conducted By Public Authorities

The above exemptions are Qualified exemptions, some class-based, others requiring a prejudice test.

PUBLIC INTEREST TEST

Considerations Favouring Disclosure

o Public awareness
In the context of this enquiry, this factor may assist in explaining the events of that day. That might assist the public to understand more clearly and accurately what actually occured, and might assist to abate inaccurate speculation.

Considerations Favouring Non-Disclosure

The following criteria will be applied by the Police Service in favour of non-disclosure:

o Investigations
Information relating to an investigation will rarely be disclosed under FOIA and only where there is a strong public interest consideration favouring disclosure. It is the Association of Chief Police Officer's approach that information relating to an investigation will rarely be disclosed under the provisions of the Freedom of Information Act. Whilst such information may be released in order to serve a 'core policing purpose' - i.e. to prevent or detect crime or to protect life or property - it will only be disclosed following a Freedom of Information request if there is are strong public interest considerations favouring disclosure. In the context of this case, relevant information is already released.

o Existing procedures
It would not be in the public interest for Freedom of Information to be used to obtain information which is already available under existing procedures. In the context of this case, this particularly would especially relate to the established legal routes through which information is properly accessed. In the context of this case, the information requested forms part of the evidence required for future Coroner's Court consideration, and should charges be brought following the police investigation could form part of that evidential case.

Balancing test / Decision

After weighing up the competing interests I have determined that further CCTV footage should not be released. It would not materially advance public knowledge, and be unlikely to effect some pre-conceptions regarding the events of that morning. I judge that the public interest balance has been properly assessed at this stage in this data release.

_________________
Follow the numbers
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Stefan
Banned
Banned


Joined: 29 Aug 2006
Posts: 1219

PostPosted: Sun Nov 09, 2008 6:06 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Henry Wilson wrote:

The faces show no sign of deliberate smudging but are subject to the low resolution of the cctv system and to the loss of detail caused by the jpeg compression.


Very debatable. I use photoshop sometimes and the face on the far right look very much like it's been deliberately smudged or blurred.

Quote:
The railing is not in front of the arm. This is part of the wall behind and not the arm.


Sorry but you're completely incorrect there. Look at the photo properly.

The wall stops pretty much where it meets his shoulder in the image.

Look properly at the gray space behind, it's low resolution but you can still see there is space between the edge of that building and the fencing. For that dark area the be the edge of the wall, and not part of the mans coat, the wall would be right against the railing.

_________________


Peace and Truth
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Henry Wilson
Minor Poster
Minor Poster


Joined: 10 Sep 2007
Posts: 15

PostPosted: Sun Nov 09, 2008 7:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

numeral wrote:
Concerning jpeg compression an uncompressed image must exist.

After the image was captured from the video tape it could have been saved as a jpeg and may never have been saved in an uncompressed form.

The cctv footage released a few months ago shows different video capture characteristics which may indicate that the original video capture was not kept and the video was recaptured for the trial.

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
TonyGosling
Editor
Editor


Joined: 25 Jul 2005
Posts: 12316
Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England

PostPosted: Mon Nov 10, 2008 12:08 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

It has never been established that any of the hapless four were bombers, let alone suicide bombers.

The entire government story has been hotly contested and the fracturing of the official narrative has been rigidly suppressed across almost all of the UK media.

I lean toward fakery having had several amomalies pointed out to me by professional photographers.

Does anyone have the petrol station Tanweer image?


Henry Wilson wrote:
Paul,
It has never been established that the picture is fake.

_________________
www.rethink911.org
www.actorsandartistsfor911truth.org
www.mediafor911truth.org
www.pilotsfor911truth.org
www.mp911truth.org
www.ae911truth.org
www.rl911truth.org
www.stj911.org
www.l911t.com
www.v911t.org
www.thisweek.org.uk
www.abolishwar.org.uk
www.elementary.org.uk
www.radio4all.net/index.php/contributor/2149
http://utangente.free.fr/2003/media2003.pdf
"The maintenance of secrets acts like a psychic poison which alienates the possessor from the community" Carl Jung
https://37.220.108.147/members/www.bilderberg.org/phpBB2/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
Henry Wilson
Minor Poster
Minor Poster


Joined: 10 Sep 2007
Posts: 15

PostPosted: Mon Nov 10, 2008 12:11 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Stefan wrote:
Henry Wilson wrote:

The faces show no sign of deliberate smudging but are subject to the low resolution of the cctv system and to the loss of detail caused by the jpeg compression.


Very debatable. I use photoshop sometimes and the face on the far right look very much like it's been deliberately smudged or blurred.

The face is no different in quality to the rest of the picture so how can it be determined that it has been smudged? And as the low resolution of the cctv system cannot reproduce the detail of a face at that distance what purpose is there in smudging?

Stefan wrote:
Quote:
The railing is not in front of the arm. This is part of the wall behind and not the arm.


Sorry but you're completely incorrect there. Look at the photo properly.

The wall stops pretty much where it meets his shoulder in the image.

Look properly at the gray space behind, it's low resolution but you can still see there is space between the edge of that building and the fencing. For that dark area the be the edge of the wall, and not part of the mans coat, the wall would be right against the railing.

I don't understand what you are describing. Here's an image with the railings and wall unobscured.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Henry Wilson
Minor Poster
Minor Poster


Joined: 10 Sep 2007
Posts: 15

PostPosted: Mon Nov 10, 2008 12:15 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

TonyGosling wrote:
I lean toward fakery having had several amomalies pointed out to me by professional photographers.
This is not a photograph, it's a cctv image.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Henry Wilson
Minor Poster
Minor Poster


Joined: 10 Sep 2007
Posts: 15

PostPosted: Mon Nov 10, 2008 12:22 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

TonyGosling wrote:
Does anyone have the petrol station Tanweer image?

This one?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
numeral
Validated Poster
Validated Poster


Joined: 23 Dec 2005
Posts: 500
Location: South London

PostPosted: Mon Nov 10, 2008 3:51 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Exibit KAR/15 NIssan MIcra DE05 RJX at Woodall Services.

04:51:27
MIcra pulls up at the pump. Tanweer gases up. Person visible in front passenger seat.

Jumps in the timestamp:

[04:51:31...41

04:51:45...57

04:52:29...33

04:52:34...38

04:52:41...53:06]

04:53:20
passenger door opens partially.

04:53:21
fade to black for a second or so. (September Clues style)

04:53:51
video resumes with the timestamp jumping 30 seconds. passenger door still open.

04:53:51 [53]
Tanweer moves out of shot

(seems to be another jump here, 7 seconds) [04:53:54...54:01]

04:54:01
Tanweer seen near wide open passenger door.

04:54:04
Tanweer out of shot. passenger door closes.

_________________
Follow the numbers
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Disco_Destroyer
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter


Joined: 05 Sep 2006
Posts: 6259

PostPosted: Mon Nov 10, 2008 1:14 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Henry Wilson wrote:
TonyGosling wrote:
I lean toward fakery having had several amomalies pointed out to me by professional photographers.
This is not a photograph, it's a cctv image.

Do you have access to the CCTV footage?
If so post it?

_________________
'Come and see the violence inherent in the system.
Help, help, I'm being repressed!'


“The more you tighten your grip, the more Star Systems will slip through your fingers.”


www.myspace.com/disco_destroyer
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Stefan
Banned
Banned


Joined: 29 Aug 2006
Posts: 1219

PostPosted: Mon Nov 10, 2008 1:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Henry, so you mean to say it is the edge of the lamp post we are seeing not the edge of the wall which as I said, and you can see in that second image, clearly has it's base around shoulder height of the figure?

Regardless of your error, it's still a good catch, fair play.

I disagree with your verdict on the smudged, blurred faces - the one on the far right at the very least looks very suspect to me.

_________________


Peace and Truth
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Disco_Destroyer
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter


Joined: 05 Sep 2006
Posts: 6259

PostPosted: Mon Nov 10, 2008 1:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I agree with Stef in as much as thee is reasonable detail to the interior of the phonebox in the background Wink
_________________
'Come and see the violence inherent in the system.
Help, help, I'm being repressed!'


“The more you tighten your grip, the more Star Systems will slip through your fingers.”


www.myspace.com/disco_destroyer
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Henry Wilson
Minor Poster
Minor Poster


Joined: 10 Sep 2007
Posts: 15

PostPosted: Mon Nov 10, 2008 5:43 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Stefan wrote:
Henry, so you mean to say it is the edge of the lamp post we are seeing not the edge of the wall which as I said, and you can see in that second image, clearly has it's base around shoulder height of the figure?

I see no lamp post. Are we looking at the same thing? The wall I am refering to is the one directly behind the railings with the reflective surface.



Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
dewstru
Suspended
Suspended


Joined: 14 Sep 2008
Posts: 61

PostPosted: Mon Nov 10, 2008 6:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Did that second image, with the pixelated faced member of the public, only turn up a few months back? 3 years AFTER the event? what's the government spin for that anomoly? Where's the whole film? why was it not released on day one?

BUT...We're not disputing there were four patsies are we? just that they couldn't have gotten on those tube carriages because of the Luton train cancellation and subsequent train delay and that no CCTV camera on the underground caught one single image of the alleged tube bombers and the CCTV at Tavistock square also failed to function .You'd have to have 'coinciloonacy' pretty bad to buy all that!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Stefan
Banned
Banned


Joined: 29 Aug 2006
Posts: 1219

PostPosted: Mon Nov 10, 2008 7:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Henry Wilson wrote:
Stefan wrote:
Henry, so you mean to say it is the edge of the lamp post we are seeing not the edge of the wall which as I said, and you can see in that second image, clearly has it's base around shoulder height of the figure?

I see no lamp post. Are we looking at the same thing? The wall I am refering to is the one directly behind the railings with the reflective surface.





Oh I get you now, it is hard to make stuff out at that resolution.

_________________


Peace and Truth
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
numeral
Validated Poster
Validated Poster


Joined: 23 Dec 2005
Posts: 500
Location: South London

PostPosted: Tue Nov 11, 2008 10:31 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Disco_Destroyer wrote:
Henry Wilson wrote:
TonyGosling wrote:
I lean toward fakery having had several amomalies pointed out to me by professional photographers.
This is not a photograph, it's a cctv image.

Do you have access to the CCTV footage?
If so post it?


7/7 cctv footage released during the Kingston trial.

http://www.met.police.uk/pressbureau/optheseus/terror41-05cctv-7july-a ldgate.wmv
http://www.met.police.uk/pressbureau/optheseus/terror41-05cctv-7july-b me-bus.wmv
http://www.met.police.uk/pressbureau/optheseus/terror41-05cctv-7july-h ussain-kingsx.wmv
http://www.met.police.uk/pressbureau/optheseus/terror41-05cctv-7july-k ingsx.wmv
http://www.met.police.uk/pressbureau/optheseus/terror41-05cctv-7july-l eeds.wmv
http://www.met.police.uk/pressbureau/optheseus/terror41-05cctv-7july-l uton.wmv
http://www.met.police.uk/pressbureau/optheseus/terror41-05cctv-7july-m 1.wmv

_________________
Follow the numbers
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
TonyGosling
Editor
Editor


Joined: 25 Jul 2005
Posts: 12316
Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England

PostPosted: Tue Nov 11, 2008 11:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

None of these links work.
Any alternatives?
On Youtube?
I wonder why the Met. might remove them!?
Can't afford the bandwidth?
Rolling Eyes

numeral wrote:

7/7 cctv footage released during the Kingston trial.

http://www.met.police.uk/pressbureau/optheseus/terror41-05cctv-7july-a ldgate.wmv
http://www.met.police.uk/pressbureau/optheseus/terror41-05cctv-7july-b me-bus.wmv
http://www.met.police.uk/pressbureau/optheseus/terror41-05cctv-7july-h ussain-kingsx.wmv
http://www.met.police.uk/pressbureau/optheseus/terror41-05cctv-7july-k ingsx.wmv
http://www.met.police.uk/pressbureau/optheseus/terror41-05cctv-7july-l eeds.wmv
http://www.met.police.uk/pressbureau/optheseus/terror41-05cctv-7july-l uton.wmv
http://www.met.police.uk/pressbureau/optheseus/terror41-05cctv-7july-m 1.wmv

_________________
www.rethink911.org
www.actorsandartistsfor911truth.org
www.mediafor911truth.org
www.pilotsfor911truth.org
www.mp911truth.org
www.ae911truth.org
www.rl911truth.org
www.stj911.org
www.l911t.com
www.v911t.org
www.thisweek.org.uk
www.abolishwar.org.uk
www.elementary.org.uk
www.radio4all.net/index.php/contributor/2149
http://utangente.free.fr/2003/media2003.pdf
"The maintenance of secrets acts like a psychic poison which alienates the possessor from the community" Carl Jung
https://37.220.108.147/members/www.bilderberg.org/phpBB2/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
numeral
Validated Poster
Validated Poster


Joined: 23 Dec 2005
Posts: 500
Location: South London

PostPosted: Wed Nov 12, 2008 1:00 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Try http://files.100777.com/77/
_________________
Follow the numbers
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    9/11, 7/7 & the War on Freedom Forum Index -> London Bombings of Thursday 7th July 2005 All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group