George Galloway is more open to 9/11 issues than Ian Collins, but only to a certain degree. Research by experts makes him shy away. He will seize upon any mis-statement or hesitancy as an excuse not to listen. Gareth from Leeds was thus cut off, as was the caller who mentioned the (illegal) disposal of forensic evidence from the WTC.
Encouraging, though, was the polite attention given to the physics Ph.D caller.
I think that letters to him are worth a try. Here are some points on which he needs clarification:
The possibility of the Twin Towers having been 'jerrybuilt' (as posited by Paul Stott shortly after 11:30) cannot explain their sudden, symmetrical and total destruction, with pulverization of concrete, bone fragments on the Deutsche Bank roof, evidence of high temps etc.
The focus of some 'truthers' on 'pull it', as misrepresented by Paul Stott, ignores the engineering and scientific concerns re. WTC 7.
Paul Stott's scenario of miles of wiring being required for demolishing the Towers ignores the existence of wireless detonation systems. HiEx Technologies, for example, make them: http://hiex.bc.ca/
The high-tech nature of the nano-thermite evidence means it could not have been planted by dishonest 9/11 activists, as George seemed to suggest. Nor could it occur naturally. See: interview with Niels Harrit, www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20110307061747765 ,
Never mind that the physics of the collapses prove controlled demolition, what Galloway is saying here is simply false. The 19 were NOT on the planes. At least nine of these are still alive as revealed by the BBC, of all people. The hijackers were NOT filmed getting on the planes. The famous film of Mohammed Attah boarding a plane shows him catching a flight from Portland, Maine, not boarding the hijacked flight on 9/11. Also, there were, in fact, no hi-jackers' names on the 9/11 flight manifests.
Unfortunately, the only explanation for Galloway's behaviour over the last years is that he is NOT AN HONEST MAN.....or perhaps it would be fairer to say, no longer an honest man.
I, like many others, have tried to address 9/11 issues with him face to face. He will not engage with the information. He changes the subject, blusters and walks away. He basically does not WANT to know.
No one, superficially, has more good reason than George to recognise that 9/11 was an 'inside job' for which Muslims were framed.
However, he is not prepared to use his position to bring the facts into the public domain and undermine the establishment 'Al Qaeda' 'War on Terror' bollox.
It is pretty clear, in my opinion, that he was heavily spoken to by our friends and protectors in MI5/MI6 and told that he would be allowed to carry on his 'good work' for the Palestinians provided he did not challenge the government 'War on Terror' meme.
I can see no other reasonable, nor even possible, explanation.
.......the man is anything but a fool (i.e. incapable of understanding the facts and the issues) and it is quite impossible that he holds the US/UK/Israel in such high moral regard, or is so ignorant of history that he could consider such a 'false flag' event an impossibility! Remember also that this is the man who famously thundered that western sanctions on Saddam Hussein's Iraq had cost hundreds of thousands of children their lives. He fought the good fight for noble causes, however the media might have continually smeared him. This observer remains grateful for his presence on the political stage, but.......
How times change. One might pity him now.
George Galloway will NEVER recognise 9/11 as an 'inside job'. Get used to it.
Perhaps Robin Cook's sudden demise after stating in public that,
"The truth is, there is no islamic army or terrorist group called Al Qaida. And any informed intelligence officer knows this. But there is a propaganda campaign to make the public believe in the presence of an identified entity…The country behind this propaganda is the US"
.....played a part in the formation of Galloway's current traitorous public persona.
_________________ _________________ --
Someone posted yesterday on one of the many Guardian CiF threads about GG and West Bradford, that may be we should consider the possibility of entryism vis GG, especially conidering his virtual disappearance and non-attendance in the HoC after his previous victory in Tower Hamlets.
I too am impressed by much of his rhetoric especially when he stuck it up the Senate, and have congratulated him on his impressive victory last week, but he may well prove to be the proverbial pressure valve also.
Even so, if he or someoine like him stood in my ward, I'd vote for them if only on the basis of "none of the above".
Joined: 25 Jul 2005 Posts: 17840 Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England
Posted: Tue Apr 03, 2012 11:03 am Post subject:
Hey Mark and Kevin,
You are treading on very dangerous ground.
Because if you are wrong you may destoy any future possibility of Galloway publicly embracing 9/11 or 7/7 truth.
We simply do not know what threats have been made to Galloway nor how close he may be to our position which he simply cannot state publicly being a public politician.
Now that would be extremely stupid and counter-productive wouldn't it.
This is the domain of provocateurs and shills.
I would suggest you both steer well clear of the subject unless you have any hard evidence that Galloway or his family has not been threatened or else that he has a covert anti Muslim or secret anti truth agenda.
Neither of you are public figures with the power of an MP so you cannot expect Galloway to behave in any way like you would. As you know politics is a very very dirty game and Galloway will surely have his suspicions about what happened to fellow Glaswegian Robin Cook.
It seems pretty clear that the forces of darkness have been moving against Galloway in this by-election victory - with his victory being met with derision by all the City stooges in the Labour party. Talksport even going to the lengths of sacking several other fine presenters as a cover to get his voice off our national airwaves.
Joined: 30 Jul 2006 Posts: 6001 Location: East London
Posted: Thu Oct 15, 2015 1:09 pm Post subject:
I've buried the hatchet with GG; he gave a very good Mayoral hustings speech at South Harrow. I got a point in, re Syria, including Roland Dumas and Wesley Clark, which was well received by all.
I later gave GG a copy of an email I had sent to Lord Carey, with lots of links re Syria and ISIS/IS.
As luck would have it GG had come across Wesley Clark's statement (I had sent him links, but I believe he said he was involved in some programme with Clark not long ago). _________________ 'And he (the devil) said to him: To thee will I give all this power, and the glory of them; for to me they are delivered, and to whom I will, I give them'. Luke IV 5-7.
George Galloway evokes Tony Benn as he pleads with the Left to vote to leave EU 'rich man's club':
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S8cF93B58Vw&feature=share _________________ 'And he (the devil) said to him: To thee will I give all this power, and the glory of them; for to me they are delivered, and to whom I will, I give them'. Luke IV 5-7.
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum