FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist  Chat Chat  UsergroupsUsergroups  CalendarCalendar RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Tue11Sept2012 - WORLDWIDE - Blog for 9/11 Truth

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    9/11, 7/7 & the War on Freedom Forum Index -> Events
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
TonyGosling
Editor
Editor


Joined: 25 Jul 2005
Posts: 12545
Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England

PostPosted: Mon Jul 16, 2012 1:56 am    Post subject: Tue11Sept2012 - WORLDWIDE - Blog for 9/11 Truth Reply with quote

Hi everyone,

I am proposing that we start a campaign: Blog for 9/11 Truth 2012!!

It goes like this: On September 11th 2012, we (and as many people we can encourage) set up a free blog on wordpress or wherever, all about the
anomalies and facts pointing to the inside job conspiracy of 9/11.

I am sure that if we get the message out, we can have thousands of new blogs posted on 9/11 2012!

WE NEED TO STEP UP OUR EFFORTS TO INFORM PEOPLE!

I am going to paste from another post of mine now:

For me, 9/11 happened when I was a schoolboy, and I watched the events unfold on the news, However, even then I had a sneaky suspicion that something
wasn’t right. There was something about it that didn’t seem genuine, and I think a lot of people felt the same.

Since then, we have come to realise lots and lots of anomalies which make it plainly obvious that 9/11 was an inside job. For all 9/11 truthers, like
me, we need to be more active now and we need to get more people aware of all the anomalies sourrounding the event. Here are just a few of them:

Larry Silverstein suddenly did not go to the ‘Windows on the World’ restaurant in the North Tower on the morning of 9/11 (he would go there every day
with his family), because he suddenly developed a ‘skin condition’ (his bodyguard later admitted that he had a phone call that morning telling him to
stay away from the twin towers that day)

Multiple expolosions were heard by many people on the day, and video footage has been released showing multiple explosions below the impact site of
the aircraft, prior to the twin towers falling.

The lease of the Twin Towers was purchased just weeks before 9/11 by Larry Silverstein (Rothschild Zionist) and Frank Lowry (Rothschild Zionist).
Both have very close links to Israeli leaders, including Benjamin Natanyahu who said that what happened on 9/11 was ‘good for Israel’. When the lease
deal was struck, SILVERSTEIN AND COMPANY VASTLY INCREASED THE INSURANCE IN THE EVENT OF A ‘TERRORIST ATTACK’, and they were awarded 4.55 billion
dollars when the towers came down.

This ‘five dancing Israelis’ stuff, which I’ve already talked about (please see my thread ‘Five dancing Israelis’ in the 9/11 forum)

WTC tower 7: BBC reported that it fell 30 mins before it did, and Larry Siverstein said that the decision was made to ‘pull it’ (i.e. a controlled
demolition)

And many others (maybe you can add some to this thread)

WE HAVE GOT TO STEP UP OUR EFFORTS TO INFORM PEOPLE ABOUT THIS STUFF!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

http://occupyilluminati.com/blog-for-911-truth-2012/

_________________
www.rethink911.org
www.actorsandartistsfor911truth.org
www.mediafor911truth.org
www.pilotsfor911truth.org
www.mp911truth.org
www.ae911truth.org
www.rl911truth.org
www.stj911.org
www.l911t.com
www.v911t.org
www.thisweek.org.uk
www.abolishwar.org.uk
www.elementary.org.uk
www.radio4all.net/index.php/contributor/2149
http://utangente.free.fr/2003/media2003.pdf
"The maintenance of secrets acts like a psychic poison which alienates the possessor from the community" Carl Jung
https://37.220.108.147/members/www.bilderberg.org/phpBB2/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
MarkMe911
On Gardening Leave
On Gardening Leave


Joined: 27 Jun 2012
Posts: 13

PostPosted: Mon Jul 23, 2012 12:03 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Tony I think it's a great idea (the Blog).

I'll add just a few more items for now:

1. There was a Category III hurricane just off the coast of New York on 9/11, something that is seldom mentioned.
It had been making its way there for about a week and there were virtually no news/weather reports of this, in a nation that usually goes bananas when hurricanes like this are threatening. (The reasons for not broadcasting about it are obvious).

2. Norman Mineta former Transportation Secretary was with Dick Cheney in the bunker at the Pentagon on the morning of 9/11. He testified that a lower ranking worker came to warn Cheney several times of an approaching aircraft towards the Pentagon. Each time he asked if the orders still stand (to leave it alone). Each time Cheney said essentially "Have I told you anything different?"

3. "If it doesn't fit, you must acquit!".
The hole in the Pentagon was too small to accommodate a Boeing 757.
Not to mention there wasn't any plane wreckage after the crash.
The first time in the history of plane crashes.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
scienceplease 2
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter


Joined: 06 Apr 2009
Posts: 1495

PostPosted: Wed Aug 29, 2012 8:53 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

MarkMe911 wrote:
Tony I think it's a great idea (the Blog).

I'll add just a few more items for now:

1. There was a Category III hurricane just off the coast of New York on 9/11, something that is seldom mentioned.
It had been making its way there for about a week and there were virtually no news/weather reports of this, in a nation that usually goes bananas when hurricanes like this are threatening. (The reasons for not broadcasting about it are obvious).

2. Norman Mineta former Transportation Secretary was with Dick Cheney in the bunker at the Pentagon on the morning of 9/11. He testified that a lower ranking worker came to warn Cheney several times of an approaching aircraft towards the Pentagon. Each time he asked if the orders still stand (to leave it alone). Each time Cheney said essentially "Have I told you anything different?"

3. "If it doesn't fit, you must acquit!".
The hole in the Pentagon was too small to accommodate a Boeing 757.
Not to mention there wasn't any plane wreckage after the crash.
The first time in the history of plane crashes.


I don't want to dampen your enthusiasm but I like to keep to real facts:
1. Hurricane: so what? It has no relevance except to Judy Woods-esque theories which appear to be disinfo
2. Norman Mineta mentioned only a single instance of an officer asking whether "the orders still stand"
3. There was plane wreckage... you could argue that there wasn't enough or the right type but there was "some" wreckage. You can definitely argue that procedures were not followed, we do not have an air crash investigation and it was coincidentally aimed at a recently refurbished part of the pentagon carrying audit investigations into the DoD's $2.3trillion audit hole which was announced by Rumsfeld the day before.

A much better argument to involve newbies is WTC7 - freefall collapse - not many people know about it and 1700+ architects and engineers dispute NIST's official findings.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
TonyGosling
Editor
Editor


Joined: 25 Jul 2005
Posts: 12545
Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England

PostPosted: Sun Sep 09, 2012 8:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

We covered the 11th anniversary this week
Can anyone turn Fran's great little In A Nutshell plug for the why's of R911 into a YouTube?
http://bcfm.org.uk/2012/09/07/17/friday-drivetime-87/21253

_________________
www.rethink911.org
www.actorsandartistsfor911truth.org
www.mediafor911truth.org
www.pilotsfor911truth.org
www.mp911truth.org
www.ae911truth.org
www.rl911truth.org
www.stj911.org
www.l911t.com
www.v911t.org
www.thisweek.org.uk
www.abolishwar.org.uk
www.elementary.org.uk
www.radio4all.net/index.php/contributor/2149
http://utangente.free.fr/2003/media2003.pdf
"The maintenance of secrets acts like a psychic poison which alienates the possessor from the community" Carl Jung
https://37.220.108.147/members/www.bilderberg.org/phpBB2/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
outsider
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter


Joined: 30 Jul 2006
Posts: 3761
Location: East London

PostPosted: Tue Sep 11, 2012 6:11 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

scienceplease 2 wrote:
MarkMe911 wrote:
Tony I think it's a great idea (the Blog).

I'll add just a few more items for now:

1. There was a Category III hurricane just off the coast of New York on 9/11, something that is seldom mentioned.
It had been making its way there for about a week and there were virtually no news/weather reports of this, in a nation that usually goes bananas when hurricanes like this are threatening. (The reasons for not broadcasting about it are obvious).

2. Norman Mineta former Transportation Secretary was with Dick Cheney in the bunker at the Pentagon on the morning of 9/11. He testified that a lower ranking worker came to warn Cheney several times of an approaching aircraft towards the Pentagon. Each time he asked if the orders still stand (to leave it alone). Each time Cheney said essentially "Have I told you anything different?"

3. "If it doesn't fit, you must acquit!".
The hole in the Pentagon was too small to accommodate a Boeing 757.
Not to mention there wasn't any plane wreckage after the crash.
The first time in the history of plane crashes.


I don't want to dampen your enthusiasm but I like to keep to real facts:
1. Hurricane: so what? It has no relevance except to Judy Woods-esque theories which appear to be disinfo
2. Norman Mineta mentioned only a single instance of an officer asking whether "the orders still stand"
3. There was plane wreckage... you could argue that there wasn't enough or the right type but there was "some" wreckage. You can definitely argue that procedures were not followed, we do not have an air crash investigation and it was coincidentally aimed at a recently refurbished part of the pentagon carrying audit investigations into the DoD's $2.3trillion audit hole which was announced by Rumsfeld the day before.

A much better argument to involve newbies is WTC7 - freefall collapse - not many people know about it and 1700+ architects and engineers dispute NIST's official findings.


1. Whilst I certainly would not want to go along the 'Hurricane' route, I believe it could be relevant, insofar as HAARP had recently been powered up to full strength, and could have been 'diverted' so as not to interfere with plans for 9/11; not something to 'harp on about', though; agree with you there.
2. I'm sure Norman Mineta mentioned the young guy coming in at least three times, not once, to inform of the incoming 'aircraft'. On his last such warning, was when he asked if the 'orders still stand'.
3. There was no identifiable plane 'wreckage' that could be linked to a Boeing at the Pentagon, and yes, the hole was way too small to have swallowed a Boeing. In fact, there was no identifiable evidence that could be linked to any of the four Boeings which were said to have been hijacked at any of the four 'crash sites', a really remarkable fact in itself; lots of parts of the aircraft were marked with id numbers which could link the part to a particular aircraft.
And just for a reminder, not one of the 19 so-called hijackers appeared on any of the 4 planes' manifests, and not one picture has been released showing any of the 'so-called hijackers' boarding the aircraft (the one that was shown showed two of them getting on a connecting flight, not one of the 'so-called' highjacked ones.

Seems a great idea, Tony.
I don't know much about blogs, but 'Let's roll!'.

_________________
'And he (the devil) said to him: To thee will I give all this power, and the glory of them; for to me they are delivered, and to whom I will, I give them'. Luke IV 5-7.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    9/11, 7/7 & the War on Freedom Forum Index -> Events All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group