FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist  Chat Chat  UsergroupsUsergroups  CalendarCalendar RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Ex-NIST's Peter Ketcham exposes WTC report lies, Alaska Uni.

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    9/11, 7/7 & the War on Freedom Forum Index -> 9/11 & 7/7 Truth News
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
TonyGosling
Editor
Editor


Joined: 25 Jul 2005
Posts: 15247
Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England

PostPosted: Wed Nov 30, 2016 12:37 am    Post subject: Ex-NIST's Peter Ketcham exposes WTC report lies, Alaska Uni. Reply with quote

What REALLY sent it down? Shock report reveals 9/11 tower DID NOT collapse because of fire
A SHOCK new report into the collapse of World Trade Centre Tower 7 is set to fuel the fires of conspiracy as it suggests multiple blazes caused its downfall.
http://www.express.co.uk/news/world/736223/9-11-tower-Building-7-colla pse-fire-conspiracy
By ZOIE O'BRIEN
PUBLISHED: 06:24, Sat, Nov 26, 2016 | UPDATED: 09:14, Sat, Nov 26, 2016

The building, which was situated next to New York’s Twin Towers, crumbled after the planes hit the towers.

Conspiracy theorists have long suggested "controlled explosions" were carried out in the building – but the official version of events says flaming debris from the burning Twin Towers flew into the 47-floor skyscraper.

Tower 7, which housed the Secret Service, the CIA, the Department of Defence and the Office of Emergency Management, collapsed after seven hours of burning.

Building 7 has been at the centre of conspiracy theories since the Twin Towers were brought down
The Twin Towers were hit on September 11, 2001, killing almost three thousand people

Building 7 is at the centre of a new report which claims the debris could not have brought it down
The National Institute of Standards and Technology insists it was the first and only steel skyscraper in the world to collapse as a result of fire.

But new bombshell claims suggest “office fires” could not have caused its destruction.

September 11 Survivors: where are they now?
Fri, September 11, 2015
Pictures showing then and now of the survivors and emergency services teams from the World Trade Center attacks on September 11th 2001 in New York

Marcy Borders, known as the Dust Lady, was captured leaving the North Tower after it was hit by a hijacked plane
Dust Lady Marcy Borders September 11
Marcy Borders Dust Lady September 11 2001

It is our preliminary conclusions based upon our work to date that fire did not produce the failure at this particular building
Dr J Leroy Hulsey
The report, by a group of top engineers from the University of Alaska, insists the flames could not have brought the tower down.

Dr J Leroy Hulsey revealed the team's boss findings at the Justice In Focus Symposium in New York.

He said: “It is our preliminary conclusions based upon our work to date that fire did not produce the failure at this particular building.”

The findings will add fuel to conspiracy theories which suggest the twin towers and WTC 7 were blown up.

Some have even blamed the US Government which they say wanted to provide the grounds for military strikes in the Middle East.

RELATED ARTICLES
Nigel Farage as our man in the US isn't a bad idea, says Leo McKinstry
RUSSIA-UK BREAKTHROUGH: Relations thaw after Johnson and Lavrov talks
The World Trade Centre was brought down in 2001GETTY
The World Trade Centre attacks rocked the globe but also sparked conspiracy theories
RELATED VIDEOS
Eyewitness accounts support Twin Towers explosions theory
September 11: Footage which claims to show a reptilian alien...
Study finds fire did not cause Twin Towers collapse
Historically, skyscrapers have resisted collapse after fires.

A skyscraper in Philadelphia burned for 18 hours in 1991 and a high-rise in Madrid in 2005 each remained standing following fires.

There is no evidence of death in Tower 7 - located around 100 metres from the Twin Towers.

_________________
www.rethink911.org
www.actorsandartistsfor911truth.org
www.mediafor911truth.org
www.pilotsfor911truth.org
www.mp911truth.org
www.ae911truth.org
www.rl911truth.org
www.stj911.org
www.l911t.com
www.v911t.org
www.thisweek.org.uk
www.abolishwar.org.uk
www.elementary.org.uk
www.radio4all.net/index.php/contributor/2149
http://utangente.free.fr/2003/media2003.pdf
"The maintenance of secrets acts like a psychic poison which alienates the possessor from the community" Carl Jung
https://37.220.108.147/members/www.bilderberg.org/phpBB2/


Last edited by TonyGosling on Thu Jul 20, 2017 11:17 am; edited 3 times in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
TonyGosling
Editor
Editor


Joined: 25 Jul 2005
Posts: 15247
Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England

PostPosted: Thu Dec 01, 2016 7:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

FORMER NIST EMPLOYEE SPEAKS OUT, SAYS TOWER 7 INVESTIGATION BOGUS, GOVT ‘DENIED EVIDENCE’
Published: November 30, 2016
http://www.blacklistednews.com/Former_NIST_Employee_Speaks_Out%2C_Says _Tower_7_Investigation_Bogus%2C_Govt_‘Denied_Evidence’/55542/0/38/38/Y  /M.html

SOURCE: BARAN HINES
http://thefreethoughtproject.com/former-nist-employee-speaks-tower-7/

A former employee of the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has stepped forward and criticized the government agency for ignoring the scientific errors found in its report on the collapse of World Trade Center Building 7 (WTC 7) during the September 11, 2001, attacks. Peter Ketcham, who spent almost fifteen years working at NIST, described how the flawed investigation methods were significantly different from the normal standards used by NIST, in a letter to the editor of the respected Europhysics News magazine. Ketcham’s letter was published in the November 2016 issue and comes just months after the magazine’s August 2016 report examining the Building 7 collapse in detail, which has been downloaded over 350,000 times according to the website.

Peter Ketcham was a contributor to numerous scientific papers during his 14 years as a part of the High Performance Systems and Services Division and later the Mathematical and Computational Sciences Division. Ketcham wrote that he felt compelled to speak out about the NIST WTC 7 investigation after reading the report for the first time in August 2016 and comparing the results with the conventional criticism from other professionals. The NIST report on WTC 7 was published in August 2008, more than 6 years after the attacks, and it concludes that the building collapsed after structural failure due to fires caused by damage from debris when the Twin Towers collapsed earlier in the day.

The root problem with the WTC Building 7 report is that NIST could not perform a definitive study under common standards of the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) because it lacked the physical evidence. Most of the structural steel was removed and melted down beginning within days after September 11, and some beams were stolen as reported by Telegraph. NIST only had access to about 150 smaller pieces of steel, called coupons, cut from the whole sections of structural steel beams.

Due to the lack of remaining evidence, NIST instead generated computer models of the building’s structure to test collapse theories using simulated fires to recreate the conditions prior to failure. The conclusions of the report have questioned for these reasons by thousands of physicists, engineers, and architects in the 15 years since the attacks, as documented by the group Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth (AE911).

The inconclusive methods used for the report are what led Ketcham to speak out after watching documentaries which criticized the report’s conclusions. He noted in his letter that he was “furious” with himself for not knowing and also at NIST for covering up the problems. “How could I have worked at NIST all those years and not have noticed this before,” Ketcham wrote.

“The NIST I knew was intellectually open, non-defensive, and willing to consider competing explanations. The more I investigated, the more apparent it became that NIST had reached a predetermined conclusion by ignoring, dismissing, and denying the evidence. Among the most egregious examples is the explanation for the collapse of WTC 7 as an elaborate sequence of unlikely events culminating in the almost symmetrical total collapse of a steel-frame building into its own footprint at free-fall acceleration,” Ketcham wrote.

The main pre-determined conclusion which Ketcham refers to is the theory created to explain why the 47-story building fell to the ground in about 12 seconds, which suggests the building suffered catastrophic failure in a short amount of time. NIST’s WTC 7 report concludes that fires led to the thermal expansion of long-span steel beams which supported the floors, causing one beam on the 13th floor to fall off of its seat. The report claims part of the 13th floor collapsed, triggering a chain reaction of floors failing around one specific vertical support column, which caused the building to fall in on itself.

NIST used computer modeling to generate the experimental environment from Building 7’s construction plans. However, professionals have criticized NIST because they have not released the models to the public for peer review. The models and methods have been questioned in many ways. However, the initial cause of the collapse receives the most scrutiny as researchers proved NIST did not accurately model the steel’s connection at the stated point of initial failure. NIST left out multiple smaller design elements shown in the construction plans which would have built a stronger connection in the computer model.

The resulting model simulation was released in a video by NIST. However, it shows the beam that failed is twisting in ways that are different from the physical properties of the steel’s connection. Researchers have shown that the NIST theory is significantly different from the possible sequences based on the construction plans and video evidence for multiple reasons.

NIST’s report on Building 7 has generated an increasing amount of controversy in academic circles and led to AE911 funding a study using computer models, which is still ongoing at the University of Alaska in Fairbanks. Researchers and activists have also been working to investigate the inconsistent methods.

_________________
www.rethink911.org
www.actorsandartistsfor911truth.org
www.mediafor911truth.org
www.pilotsfor911truth.org
www.mp911truth.org
www.ae911truth.org
www.rl911truth.org
www.stj911.org
www.l911t.com
www.v911t.org
www.thisweek.org.uk
www.abolishwar.org.uk
www.elementary.org.uk
www.radio4all.net/index.php/contributor/2149
http://utangente.free.fr/2003/media2003.pdf
"The maintenance of secrets acts like a psychic poison which alienates the possessor from the community" Carl Jung
https://37.220.108.147/members/www.bilderberg.org/phpBB2/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
scienceplease 2
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter


Joined: 06 Apr 2009
Posts: 1687

PostPosted: Sat Feb 04, 2017 8:04 pm    Post subject: NIST whistleblower condemns WTC report, speaks of coercion Reply with quote

Peter Michael Ketcham, former NIST employee and whistleblower, speaks out at A&E event in December 2016.

He condemns NIST investigations of WTC buildings saying NIST investigators may have been coerced by Federal Government.


Link
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
TonyGosling
Editor
Editor


Joined: 25 Jul 2005
Posts: 15247
Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England

PostPosted: Sun Feb 05, 2017 12:40 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

TonyGosling wrote:
What REALLY sent it down? Shock report reveals 9/11 tower DID NOT collapse because of fire
A SHOCK new report into the collapse of World Trade Centre Tower 7 is set to fuel the fires of conspiracy as it suggests multiple blazes caused its downfall.
http://www.express.co.uk/news/world/736223/9-11-tower-Building-7-colla pse-fire-conspiracy
By ZOIE O'BRIEN
PUBLISHED: 06:24, Sat, Nov 26, 2016 | UPDATED: 09:14, Sat, Nov 26, 2016

The building, which was situated next to New York’s Twin Towers, crumbled after the planes hit the towers.

Conspiracy theorists have long suggested "controlled explosions" were carried out in the building – but the official version of events says flaming debris from the burning Twin Towers flew into the 47-floor skyscraper.

Tower 7, which housed the Secret Service, the CIA, the Department of Defence and the Office of Emergency Management, collapsed after seven hours of burning.

Building 7 has been at the centre of conspiracy theories since the Twin Towers were brought down
The Twin Towers were hit on September 11, 2001, killing almost three thousand people

Building 7 is at the centre of a new report which claims the debris could not have brought it down
The National Institute of Standards and Technology insists it was the first and only steel skyscraper in the world to collapse as a result of fire.

But new bombshell claims suggest “office fires” could not have caused its destruction.

September 11 Survivors: where are they now?
Fri, September 11, 2015
Pictures showing then and now of the survivors and emergency services teams from the World Trade Center attacks on September 11th 2001 in New York

Marcy Borders, known as the Dust Lady, was captured leaving the North Tower after it was hit by a hijacked plane
Dust Lady Marcy Borders September 11
Marcy Borders Dust Lady September 11 2001

It is our preliminary conclusions based upon our work to date that fire did not produce the failure at this particular building
Dr J Leroy Hulsey
The report, by a group of top engineers from the University of Alaska, insists the flames could not have brought the tower down.

Dr J Leroy Hulsey revealed the team's boss findings at the Justice In Focus Symposium in New York.

He said: “It is our preliminary conclusions based upon our work to date that fire did not produce the failure at this particular building.”

The findings will add fuel to conspiracy theories which suggest the twin towers and WTC 7 were blown up.

Some have even blamed the US Government which they say wanted to provide the grounds for military strikes in the Middle East.

RELATED ARTICLES
Nigel Farage as our man in the US isn't a bad idea, says Leo McKinstry
RUSSIA-UK BREAKTHROUGH: Relations thaw after Johnson and Lavrov talks
The World Trade Centre was brought down in 2001GETTY
The World Trade Centre attacks rocked the globe but also sparked conspiracy theories
RELATED VIDEOS
Eyewitness accounts support Twin Towers explosions theory
September 11: Footage which claims to show a reptilian alien...
Study finds fire did not cause Twin Towers collapse
Historically, skyscrapers have resisted collapse after fires.

A skyscraper in Philadelphia burned for 18 hours in 1991 and a high-rise in Madrid in 2005 each remained standing following fires.

There is no evidence of death in Tower 7 - located around 100 metres from the Twin Towers.

_________________
www.rethink911.org
www.actorsandartistsfor911truth.org
www.mediafor911truth.org
www.pilotsfor911truth.org
www.mp911truth.org
www.ae911truth.org
www.rl911truth.org
www.stj911.org
www.l911t.com
www.v911t.org
www.thisweek.org.uk
www.abolishwar.org.uk
www.elementary.org.uk
www.radio4all.net/index.php/contributor/2149
http://utangente.free.fr/2003/media2003.pdf
"The maintenance of secrets acts like a psychic poison which alienates the possessor from the community" Carl Jung
https://37.220.108.147/members/www.bilderberg.org/phpBB2/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
Whitehall_Bin_Men
Validated Poster
Validated Poster


Joined: 13 Jan 2007
Posts: 1712
Location: Westminster, LONDON, SW1A 2HB.

PostPosted: Wed Mar 15, 2017 7:16 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

9-11: Former NIST Employee Points Out Contradictions in #WTC7 Official Report

Link

Stand for the Truth (link: https://youtu.be/GvAv-114bwM) youtu.be/GvAv-114bwM via @AE911Truth

_________________
--
'Suppression of truth, human spirit and the holy chord of justice never works long-term. Something the suppressors never get.' David Southwell
http://aangirfan.blogspot.com
http://aanirfan.blogspot.com
Martin Van Creveld: Let me quote General Moshe Dayan: "Israel must be like a mad dog, too dangerous to bother."
Martin Van Creveld: I'll quote Henry Kissinger: "In campaigns like this the antiterror forces lose, because they don't win, and the rebels win by not losing."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
TonyGosling
Editor
Editor


Joined: 25 Jul 2005
Posts: 15247
Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England

PostPosted: Wed Jul 19, 2017 11:13 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

“Stand for the Truth”: Destruction of WTC Towers, A Government Researcher Speaks Out
https://www.therussophile.org/stand-for-the-truth-destruction-of-wtc-t owers-a-government-researcher-speaks-out.html/


Link

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GvAv-114bwM

Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth announce the release of “Stand for the Truth,” a half-hour interview with former NIST employee Peter Michael Ketcham.

In this poignant and incisive piece, Mr. Ketcham tells his story of discovering that the agency where he had worked for 14 years had deliberately suppressed the truth about the most pivotal event of the 21st century — the destruction of the World Trade Center on 9/11.

Through his willingness to look openly at what he failed to see in front of him for 15 years, Mr. Ketcham inspires us to believe that we can all muster the courage to confront the truth — and, in so doing, finally heal the wounds of 9/11.

We hope this interview will serve as a powerful “red pill” for viewers who are new or resistant to this information. To that end, we encourage you to share the video with your friends, family, and colleagues.

This production was made possible by the donations you made last November after Mr. Ketcham’s letter to the editor was published in Europhysics News.

We are grateful to everyone who contributed to this effort — and to our dedicated videographers on this project, John Massaria and Richard Grove.


from: http://www.globalresearch.ca/stand-for-the-truth-destruction-of-wtc-to wers-a-government-researcher-speaks-out/5579715

_________________
www.rethink911.org
www.actorsandartistsfor911truth.org
www.mediafor911truth.org
www.pilotsfor911truth.org
www.mp911truth.org
www.ae911truth.org
www.rl911truth.org
www.stj911.org
www.l911t.com
www.v911t.org
www.thisweek.org.uk
www.abolishwar.org.uk
www.elementary.org.uk
www.radio4all.net/index.php/contributor/2149
http://utangente.free.fr/2003/media2003.pdf
"The maintenance of secrets acts like a psychic poison which alienates the possessor from the community" Carl Jung
https://37.220.108.147/members/www.bilderberg.org/phpBB2/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    9/11, 7/7 & the War on Freedom Forum Index -> 9/11 & 7/7 Truth News All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group