Joined: 25 Jul 2005 Posts: 16287 Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England
Posted: Sat Mar 06, 2010 10:51 pm Post subject:
Northwest Flight 253: Mounting Evidence of U.S. Complicity in Terrorism by Gordon Duff (Gordon Duff is Veterans Today Senior Editor and a Marine combat veteran) Extract from www.veteranstoday.com (29/12/09) :-
JUST THE FACTS:
Let's review what we know thus far:
- Our terrorist traveled to Yemen to meet with terrorists there
- The terrorists in Yemen had been in Guantanamo but had been ordered released by the Bush Administration. The government of Yemen tells us that Islamic terrorists there have been arrested who have proven ties to Israeli intelligence
- Our terrorist's father, though we are told is a retired "Nigerian banker" actually ran their defense industry in close cooperation with Israeli Intelligence (Mossad)
- Our terrorist's visa to the US was never withdrawn, though he was on a "terrorist watchlist"
- Our terrorist, though flying from Nigeria, entered the Netherlands without passing through customs, something impossible to do without assistance from an intelligence agency
- Our terrorist, while at the Amsterdam airport, was being assisted by a man appearing to be Indian, who claimed our Nigerian terrorist was a Sudanese refugee with no passport (no passport was used entering the EU, something technically impossible)
- However, Dutch authorities, the same ones who confirmed he entered the country with no passport also confirmed he had a valid US visa, though on a terrorist watch list that is shared with the Dutch authorities.
- Airport security in Amsterdam is contracted to an Israeli controlled company with, not only the most sophisticated technologies, but, in fact, the company that had developed the concept of security profiling.
- The parallels between this case and the Richard Reid "shoe bomber" case are much more than admitted.
WHERE THE STORY IS GOING
We keep going back to 2007. Why were these terrorists released to Saudi custody? Why did Saudi Arabia release them soon thereafter? With the 2nd major terrorist front in the world being Yemen and the terrorist operation there under the control of released Bush detainees, there is reason for suspicion.
While we have all of these facts, easily verifiable, we have a much stronger case against the Bush Administration or Israel than Al Qaeda. There is no real evidence that Al Qaeda would be operating in Yemen without American or Saudi help and even, as stated by the Government of Yemen, direct material assistance from Israel.
(Compiled by www.thisweek.org.uk )
Northwest flight terror attack staged?
Thu, 28 Jan 2010 22:56:06 GMT
Accounts from passengers of the Flight 253, aboard which Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab tried to detonate explosives, suggest that the attack was staged.
According to American Free Press, the security firm in charge of Amsterdam's Schiphol Airport is the Israeli-owned International Consultants on Targeted Security — the same security firm at the airports where the 9/11 terrorists hijacked the three planes.
Despite tight security screening procedures performed after the 9/11 attacks, passengers who boarded Northwest Airlines Flight 253 said they found security at Amsterdam's airport to be surprisingly lax.
Richelle Keepman, who was one of the passengers onboard Flight 253, told CNN that security did not have them remove their shoes as they walked through the scanners and metal detectors.
Keepman also said that her mother was allowed to take a large bottle of water onboard the plane.
Another passenger onboard flight 253, Detroit attorney Kurt Haskell, told CNN that he saw a polished Indian man escort Abdulmutallab to the ticket agent, and tried to convince the agent to allow Abdulmutallab board the plane without a passport.
"This man needs to board the plane, but he doesn't have a passport," Haskell quoted the Indian as telling the agent. When the agent refused to let him board the plane, the Indian man responded, "He is from Sudan. We do this all the time." The ticket agent, then, took them down a hallway to meet with a supervisor. Haskell said the next time he saw Abdulmutallab was when he tried to ignite the explosives hidden inside his underwear.
Keepman told CNN's Anderson Cooper 360 show that when she first boarded the plane, she noticed a man with a camcorder filming the goings-on inside the plane. After the incident took place, Keepman said the man with the camcorder was the only one standing as he continued to film the scene. Haskell said that after the plane landed, another Indian man was led away in handcuffs after bomb-sniffing dogs detected explosives in his carry-on luggage.
To date, FBI officials have refused to acknowledge the arrest of the Indian man.
'Underpants bomber' fires his lawyers and wants to plead guilty
Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab, accused of trying to blow up a plane with explosives in his underpants, has fired his court-appointed lawyers and asked a US judge about the process for him to plead guilty to some of the charges against him.
In his first court appearance since January, Abdulmutallab said he did not believe his lawyers were serving his best interest and asked District Court Judge Nancy Edmunds to let him represent himself.
Judge Edmunds strongly urged him not to fire his lawyers, but agreed to allow Abdulmutallab's request and will appoint new lawyers to act as consultants to him.
"If I want to plead guilty to some counts, how would that work?" Abdulmutallab asked Judge Edmunds toward the end of the 15-minute court appearance.
She told him that a standby lawyer would be available to answer that type of question.
Abdulmutallab was charged with attempted use of a weapon of mass destruction and five other offences for trying to down an airliner as it approached Detroit last Christmas Day.
He could be sentenced to life in prison if found guilty.
He has been co-operating with US investigators for several months.
The failed attack led to further efforts by the Obama administration to strengthen US airline security.
The Nigerian man linked to al Qaeda tried to ignite explosives sewn into his underwear on the Northwest Airlines Airbus A330 jet after a long flight from Amsterdam, but he was subdued by passengers and crew members and the fire was contained.
Abdulmutallab suffered severe burns but the bomb failed to detonate. He told investigators he was given the explosive by al Qaeda operatives in Yemen and had trained there.
In a court filing ahead of his appearance, Abdulmutallab's lawyers said they had met in person and by phone "on multiple occasions with government counsel to discuss options for resolution of the case." _________________ The Medium is the Massage - Marshall McLuhan.
Joined: 25 Jul 2005 Posts: 16287 Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England
Posted: Sat Jan 08, 2011 8:52 pm Post subject:
Christmas Day One Year Later-The Underwear Bomber - Case Closed
Saturday, December 25, 2010 - by Kurt Haskell from Thailand
It has been one year since the Underwear Bomber incident that changed my life. I'm not going to rehash the entire story of my account, as that is available here in my past postings on this blog. I just have a few things to say that I've been thinking about as I hike through the jungles of Thailand.
On January 28, 2010 I first posted that the Sharp Dressed Man was a U.S. Government Agent.
Three days after I wrote the above blog post, I wrote the following post, which discusses what I considered to be the most important remaining questions regarding flight 253.
The third question that I asked, "Was the bomb intended to explode?", to me, is the entire key to the story. I believe it has been answered.
On January 31, 2010 I never would have dreamt of a scenario in which the U.S. Government would ADMIT that it was handing out fake bombs to terrorists, but that has now happened on two occasions that I'm aware of in 2010:
Also, if you take a look at this interview with the college kid that sat next to Umar (I refuse to call him a terrorist as he is a mere patsy), you can see that the U.S. Government seized all of his clothes:
The above three articles when taken together definitively solve the entire underwear bomber episode. The first two represent the modus operandi of the FBI/CIA, which is, if nobody get hurt, fake bombs are o.k. I will discuss that aspect in a minute. When you look deeply at the third article you have to ask the question, why were all of his clothes seized? The bombing substance, allegedly PETN was all over the airplane cabin near Umar's seat. It is not like there was a lack of material to be tested. The truth is that the government seized it all so that nobody could test the real chemical composition to determine that the bomb was indeed a dud. If I would have known that I would be writing this article one year ago, I would have picked up some of the substance as I walked within inches of it.........
Joined: 13 Sep 2006 Posts: 2557 Location: One breath from Glory
Posted: Wed Oct 12, 2011 5:31 pm Post subject:
UK & World News12 October 2011, 17:01
Christmas Day 'Pants Bomber' Pleads Guilty
A Nigerian man has pleaded guilty to trying to kill nearly 300 people on a US-bound passenger plane on Christmas Day 2009 with a bomb hidden in his underwear.
Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab was charged with eight offences, including conspiracy to commit an act of terrorism, attempted murder and attempted use of a weapon of mass destruction.
Al Qaeda's Yemen-based arm claimed responsibility for the attack, which was also praised by Osama bin Laden months before he was killed in a US raid in Pakistan.
US judge Nancy Edmunds asked Abdulmutallab if he wanted to plead guilty to the charges. As she read out each charge against him, he said: "I plead guilty."
He told the judge he was fulfilling a "religious duty" and participating in an act of jihad against the US.
He said his planned attack was meant to avenge the deaths of "innocent Muslims" in Yemen, Afghanistan and elsewhere.
"The US should be warned that if they continue to kill and support those who kill innocent Muslims, then the US should await a great calamity... or God will strike them directly," he said.
"If you laugh at us now, we will laugh at you later."
Abdulmutallab previously told US investigators he had received the bomb, which failed to detonate fully, and training from al Qaeda militants in Yemen.
After the attempted attack, the Obama administration introduced a number of measures to strengthen US airline security.
These included the deployment of full-body scanners that can detect explosives that are hidden in a passenger's clothing.
Abdulmutallab's father, a prominent Nigerian banker, had warned the CIA about his son's growing radicalisation but the warning apparently went unheeded.
The terrorist's calm and respectful demeanour in court as he made his pleas was in sharp contrast with his disruptive behaviour during jury selection.
He pledged militants would wipe out the "cancer" that is the US, and praised al Qaeda cleric Anwar al Awlaqi and Osama bin Laden.
Abdulmutallab will be sentenced on January 12, 2012.
Kurt Haskell Says He Will Sue Feds in Underwear Bomber Case
October 12, 2011
Appearing on the Alex Jones Show today, Michigan attorney Kurt Haskell said he plans to file a civil lawsuit against the government in the underwear bomber case now that Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab has suddenly reversed course and decided to plead guilty.
“Abdulmutallab’s reversal now means that Detroit Attorney Kurt Haskell’s contention that the plot was, as in almost every other terror case made public, a product of government entrapment, and that the US intelligence establishment was involved in the aborted attack, will now remain buried, at least for the time being,” Paul Joseph Watson wrote earlier today as news of the reversal was reported.
Abdulmutallab entered a plea of not guilty eight months ago at the start of his trial on charges he attempted to use of a weapon of mass destruction, conspired to commit an act of terrorism and attempted murder.
The corporate media immediately attempted to cover the government’s effort to shut down the case and prevent Haskell from testifying by claiming Abdulmutallab had changed course in order to have the opportunity to read a six-minute speech to the courtroom in which he said that his crimes had been a payback for U.S. military killings of people in Afghanistan, Iraq and elsewhere.
Kurt Haskell said the lawsuit will allow him to subpoena witnesses and ask questions. He told Alex Jones he is primarily interested in getting “some more truth” out of the case now that the government has moved to shut down the release of further information, in particular the identity of the well dressed Indian man who escorted Abdulmutallab to the flight in Amsterdam on Christmas day, 2009.
Alex noted that it is now government policy to murder suspects like the underwear bomber’s alleged handler and Pentagon dinner guest, Anwar Awlaki, instead of bringing them to trial.
Because of this and the government’s habitual lies and deception, lawsuits like the one Kurt Haskell will file against the government are of particular importance, Jones explained.
Christmas Day Two Years Later and the Current State of the U.S.
by Kurt Haskell
It has now been two years since the Underwear Bomber attack. Once again, Lori and I find ourselves reflecting during the holidays about what happened on Flight 253. The attack, which comprised only two minutes of our lives, continues to shape our thoughts and beliefs. Although the criminal case has ended (except for sentencing which will happen in January 2012), the laws of Michigan allow for a two year period statute of limitations in order for the injured to bring a civil lawsuit. The time period to file such a lawsuit lapses tomorrow. Lori and I have had the plan to file a civil suit at the conclusion of the criminal case, which ended in October 2011. The plan was for me to file the civil case on my own in order to keep her out of the inevitable attacks and aggravation that would come from such a suit. I have talked to several attorneys to represent me in such a case, but none of them were willing to take on the U.S. Government. I made the decision that I would represent myself in such a case. I have spent a great deal of time researching the suit and have worked on writing the complaint to initiate the case. Even though I have spent a great deal of time researching the civil case, I don't feel that I have spent enough time on the case. I have come to the conclusion that becoming involved in such a case would be an overwhelming constraint on my time. As I am a very busy attorney, this would be time that I don't have to give up. I have been willing to give up my nights and weekends in order to work on the case to further expose evidence to prove that the U.S. Government was behind the staged attack.
Over the past few weeks, I have reconsidered my decision to file a civil case, and I will instead, begrudgingly, let the statute of limitations lapse. There are several reasons I have reconsidered my decision. The purpose of my civil lawsuit would not have been to obtain compensation, but would have been to obtain further evidence that the U.S. Government perpetrated the attack. Personally, I don't need any further evidence to prove the matter to myself. I have laid out my case in numerous prior postings on this blog. I have convinced the vast majority of people that have chosen to look at all of the evidence that I've presented. I don't believe I can convince anyone else. Those that choose to deny the obvious will still not be convinced even if they watched the Schiphol airport video and audio showing what I have indicated. What then would be the purpose of my civil suit? I could possibly obtain further evidence, but that would only further convince those that already believe the U.S. Government is behind the attack. I also believe that obtaining such evidence would be nearly impossible. We now have a U.S. Government so drunk with its own power that it believes it is o.k. to kill U.S. citizens without a trial and/or to detain them forever without a hearing before a judge.
Would the U.S. Government willingly turn over evidence to me to show conclusively that it was behind the Underwear Bombing attack when it believes it can kill or detain American citizens indefinitely? Not a chance in hell. It is much more likely that the U.S. Government would declare me a person that "substantially aided" a terrorist under the new defense authorization bill and detain me indefinitely without a trial. However, that was not really a concern that led to my decision to not file a civil case. What did play a factor was the reaction, or lack thereof, of Americans in relation to the passing of this bill. Why are Americans not outraged and protesting by the millions in Washington over this law? It has just further confirmed to me that the vast majority of Americans just don't care what the U.S. Government does in relation to "terrorism". I can't tell you how many times people have told me that they are o.k. to let the U.S. Government do whatever it wants to do against terrorists in order to make them safe. I have news for these people, if there are terrorists everywhere; there is nothing that can be done to make you entirely safe. I live very close to the largest population of Muslims in the U.S. If terrorism were as bad as the U.S. Government makes it out to be, car and suicide bombings would occur in my area on a regular basis. The fact that they never occur is very telling. It is my belief that the war on terror is nothing but a fraudulent U.S. Government creation designed, in part, to take away all of the rights of Americans and to further enrich and consolidate the power of those in control.
Our Constitutional rights are currently under attack and are being rapidly taken away. In case you haven't been paying attention, the definition of "terrorist" is slowly changing to one that means "a person that doesn't agree with the U.S. Government". When those that have given away all of their rights to combat terrorism suddenly discover that they are in fact terrorists, it will be too late. If I filed and won my lawsuit and proved that the U.S. Government staged the Underwear Bomber attack, would these people care? No they wouldn't. Would it stop the U.S. Government's assault on our Constitutional Rights? No it wouldn't. Would anyone do anything if I was labeled a terrorist and detained indefinitely without a trial? Not a chance. These people comprise the vast majority of the American population. The corruption is so entrenched that 93 out of 100 senators voted for the recent law that allows for the indefinite detention of Americans without a trial. Can anyone think of any recent law that had that had such a vast majority of approval by both Democrats and Republicans? I can't think of any. The question I have is why would this bill obtain such vast approval? The answer to me is an obvious one. The U.S. as we know it is on the edge of complete collapse due to an out of control national debt. This collapse will lead to an economic collapse that will make the Great Depression look like a fun time. The National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility, an 18 member bi-partisan commission created by President Obama, recently indicated that the financial collapse will occur within two years.
Obviously, the vast majority of senators that voted in support of the authorization to detain Americans indefinitely are worried that Americans may turn their anger from a financial collapse onto their political representatives. The approval of such a law was made in order to protect the politicians themselves from unruly mobs of Americans that are angry from the financial collapse. These Americans will be the new "terrorists". The new "terrorists" will find indefinite “housing” in FEMA camps that are being built throughout the U.S.
What other explanation could there be for the large bipartisan support for such an unconstitutional law? There is none. It is also shocking that a president that is a supposed Constitutional law expert would approve of a law that is such a direct violation of the Constitution. This is the sad state of affairs that is prevalent in the U.S. today.
What also had an effect on my decision to not file a civil case was the indication by the National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility that the U.S. economy will collapse within the next two years. Lori and I have had a multi-year plan (Going back to 2006) to retire and move out of the U.S. Our current plan is to move abroad at the end of 2013. Apparently, according to the commission, this would coincide with the U.S. economic collapse. If I were to file a civil suit, the time and money I would need to put into such a case would delay our move out of the U.S. For obvious reasons, we don’t want to be in the U.S. when it collapses and definitely, don’t want to be considered “wealthy” when millions of out of control Americans look for scapegoats for their economic problems.
Make no mistake, my decision to not file a civil case was not due to intimidation. If it was, I never would have spoken out against the U.S. Government in the first place. My decision rests on two conditions that have become increasingly clear over the past two months:
1. The vast majority of Americans don’t care or will never believe that the U.S. Government is staging false terror attacks against its own citizens.
2. The U.S. is facing imminent economic collapse for which I need to devote as much time and save as much money as possible in order to financially prepare to leave the U.S. permanently.
On a side note, I saw that a fellow Underwear Bomber passenger has filed a civil suit.
Note that Mr. Maranga has sued the airline and not the U.S. Government agents that were behind the attack. I have spoken to Mr. Maranga on several occasions and he is not convinced that the U.S. Government was involved. Don’t expect anything earth shattering to come out of this lawsuit. I originally read this story on the Detroit Free Press website, which I have been unable to locate. The comments section of that article contains many posts attacking Mr. Maranga for wanting compensation for his emotional injuries. Such is the sad state of the mind of the standard American. By the way, in order to sue an airline for an injury received on an international flight, you must have a physical injury and not just emotional trauma. What is interesting to me is that the U.S. was responsible for this provision in the Montreal Convention (the current law on international airline travel). Most nations wanted passengers to be able to sue for strictly emotional injuries, but the U.S. wouldn’t allow it. As I didn’t suffer a physical injury, I am prohibited from suing the airline.
I know that many people will be disappointed in my decision to not sue the members of the U.S. Government that were behind the fraudulent, false, threat known as the Underwear Bomber attack. I understand your feelings. I don’t want to let it go myself, but I have to look at the reality of the situation. The vast majority of Americans are not willing to believe that their government is as corrupt and evil as it is. No significant change will occur until this changes, and likely, even then, won’t occur without an overthrow of the government. Such a time will not occur without prior significant financial hardship happening to the vast majority of Americans. That time is coming, but it is not yet here. A cost benefit analysis regarding the filing of a civil suit indicates that there is no real upside to filing such a case, but there is significant downside. Nonetheless, I will continue to speak out against the corrupt and fraudulent U.S. Government and will continue to support those Americans that are paying attention and want their country to return to the free country that it once was.
Joined: 30 Jul 2006 Posts: 5837 Location: East London
Posted: Thu Dec 29, 2011 9:44 pm Post subject:
I make you right, Kurt and Lori!
God bless you for speaking out.
There is an old saying, 'The people get the leaders they deserve'; unfortunately, decent ordinary people either don't get a say, or are bamboozled by fakery and complicit media. _________________ 'And he (the devil) said to him: To thee will I give all this power, and the glory of them; for to me they are delivered, and to whom I will, I give them'. Luke IV 5-7.
Joined: 25 Jul 2005 Posts: 16287 Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England
Posted: Wed Feb 22, 2012 1:18 am Post subject:
Questions surround government’s actions in “underwear” bomber case
- Doug Hagmann & Joseph Hagmann Tuesday, February 21, 2012
Commonly referenced as the “underwear bomber” or the “Christmas Day bomber,” Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab was sentenced to life in prison last week by U.S. District Judge Nancy Edmunds in a Michigan court. He unexpectedly pleaded guilty on October 12, 2011 (day two of his trial) to eight felony counts, including attempted murder and attempted use of a weapon of mass destruction, related to reported attempt to detonate an explosive hidden in his underwear while aboard Northwest Airlines flight 253 flying from Amsterdam to Detroit on Christmas Day, 2009. There were 279 passengers and 11 crewmembers aboard that flight.
While it is indisputable that Islamic terrorists indeed exist and target the West, there are a number of things very wrong with the official account of this event. The problems begin well before Abdulmutallab ever stepped foot aboard flight 253 and continue through today. Moreover, the fact-a-phobic media appears to have been neutered with regard to reporting on this very questionable scenario.
Bomber allowed to board plane with explosives
As ugly and conspiratorial as it sounds, Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab was permitted to board flight 253 with explosives despite being identified as a terrorist.
You need not take our word for it, however. Undersecretary of Management at the U.S. State Department, Patrick F. Kennedy, disclosed this tidbit during a January 27, 2010 hearing of the House Committee on Homeland Security.
Appearing uncomfortable throughout the questioning, Kennedy testified that Abdulmutallab appeared on a terrorist watch list before and on the day of the attempted bombing. Kennedy’s testimony seemed stained and contradictory at times, but he made it clear that Abdulmutallab was permitted to proceed on board the flight at the direction of a person and agency that he would reveal only in camera, or privately to the committee.
The reason Abdulmutallab and the bomb were permitted aboard an airliner carrying 290 people has strained the credulity of even the most hardened skeptics; he was under surveillance and our intelligence agencies were attempting to identify the members of a larger plot by having “eyes on him.” It certainly does not take an investigator to refute the logic of that account, considering the lives of 290 men, women and children aboard flight 253 and others on the ground were placed in jeopardy. Even if that were remotely the case, how would you feel if your wife, husband, son or daughter were aboard that aircraft?
Abdulmutallab assisted at Amsterdam airport
According to multiple witnesses, the would-be bomber was actually assisted in boarding the now infamous flight. Kurt Haskell, perhaps the most well known witness who was also aboard flight 253 with his wife, remained steadfast in his account that a yet unidentified well-dressed man, possibly of Indian descent, assisted the bomber at the airport when he appeared to be having problems with security.
Since the events of Christmas Day 2009, Mr. Haskell has provided first-hand accounts to Alex Jones of Infowars and Prison Planet TV. The information provided by Mr. Haskell is consistent with information we received from an inside source working for a federal intelligence agency familiar with this incident. According to our source, airport security officials were told to “stand down” by a contact within the U.S. Department of Homeland Security and permit Abdulmutallab to board the aircraft.
Perhaps this would explain why Department of Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano refused to testify in front of House Committee members in January 2010 despite being asked to do so by the committee.
Inexplicable events in Detroit
In an extreme departure from normal protocol, flight 253 taxied to the airport gate despite the presence of a bomb onboard. Additionally, the passengers of the flight were forced to remain on the plane despite Abdulmutallab’s statements that there was a second bomb on the aircraft, and without knowing whether the bomber had accomplices.
When the passengers were finally escorted from the plane, the manner of their exit actually caused some to step on parts of the bomb. Additional accounts from Mr. Haskell and other passengers provide interesting and critical insight into either incredible incompetence or some level of foreknowledge about the entire scenario.
The oddities surrounding this incident and Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab extended into federal court. The would-be bomber pleaded not guilty to the charges, yet inexplicably reversed his decision a mere two days before potentially mitigating or perhaps even exculpatory evidence could be heard in court. It was a move that should have baffled his defense team and anyone paying attention to this case.
It is less baffling when combined with all other unanswered questions pertaining to this case are viewed in totality. His move otherwise buried possible evidence of government complicity, or at least incompetence, from public purview.
Follow the money?
When the wheels of flight 253 touched down, there were only 40 full body scanners in place at 19 airports in the U.S. Today, these scanners are in place or scheduled to be deployed throughout the U.S., and not just in airports.
As we previously reported, former DHS Secretary Michael Chertoff and co-author of the U.S. Patriot Act took to the airwaves to lobby for the placement of the nuclear scanners at all airports, using flight 253 as the reason.
In the wake of his flurry of media appearances suggesting that full body scanners would have likely caught Abdulmutallab, an article critical of Chertoff appeared in the January 1, 2010 edition of The Washington Post. The former DHS secretary was criticized for “using his former government credentials to advocate for a product that benefits his clients.”
It was disclosed that Chertoff’s security consulting agency included a client that manufactures the controversial scanners. That client is Rapiscan Systems, the leading provider of the scanners to the TSA and numerous other airports across the world.
Rapiscan is a wholly owned subsidiary of OSI Systems, Inc., a worldwide company based in California that develops and markets security and inspection systems. It is one of a handful of such companies trying to corner the market on security hardware for the air transportation industry – a market estimated to be worth $300 billion in the United States alone.
OSI Systems, Inc. made headlines last week when the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey awarded them a $15 million contract to install their cargo scanners at the new World Trade Center. Through 2009, however, OSI Systems, Inc. was posting revenue losses. Starting in 2010, after the “failed bombing attempt,” the company has posted continuous quarterly gains.
Investigation disclosed that some of the full body scanners were purchased with stimulus money. Also, it was uncovered that the infamous George Soros held nearly 12,000 shares of stock in the parent company.
No questions asked
Despite all of the oddities surrounding Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab (and there are many more than listed here), the Department of Homeland Security and all of the agencies people involved, not one of our elected officials has appeared to have any desire to disclose the truth of flight 253. Additionally, the corporate media has been AWOL to the point of complicity.
It’s time for Americans to demand accountability - or resignations.
Joined: 25 Jul 2005 Posts: 16287 Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England
Posted: Wed Feb 22, 2012 1:18 am Post subject:
BREAKING: Kurt Haskell Exposes Government False Flag Operation During Underwear Bomber Sentencing
Exclusive: Personal Statement from Kurt Haskell, Delta 253 Passenger
Thursday, February 16, 2012
Every victim of a crime in Michigan is entitled to make a statement in open court regarding the impact of the crime on their life. The statement is limited to the victim’s physical, emotional and financial well being as it relates to the crime. Keep that in mind as you read my statement. Below is a copy of the victim impact statement I gave today at the Underwear Bomber sentencing hearing. When reading my statement, keep in mind that I am a practicing attorney in the State of Michigan. In addition, I regularly practice in the Court the hearings are taking place at and therefore, I am somewhat limited as to what I can say. We were limited to 5 minutes each.
I wish to thank the Court for allowing me these 5 minutes to make my statement. My references to the government in this statement refer to the Federal Government excluding this Court and the prosecution. On Christmas Day 2009, my wife and I were returning from an African safari and had a connecting flight through Amsterdam. As we waited for our flight, we sat on the floor next to the boarding gate. What I witnessed while sitting there and subsequent events have changed my life forever. While I sat there, I witnessed Umar dressed in jeans and a white t-shirt, being escorted around security by a man in a tan suit who spoke perfect American English and who aided Umar in boarding without a passport. The airline gate worker initially refused Umar boarding until the man in the tan suit intervened. The event meant nothing to me at the time. Little did I know that Umar would try to kill me a few hours later as our flight approached Detroit. The final 10 minutes of our flight after the attack were the worst minutes of my life. During those 10 minutes I sat paralyzed in fear. Unfortunately, what happened next has had an even greater impact on my life and has saddened me further.
When we landed, I was shocked that our plane taxied up to the gate. I was further shocked that we were forced to sit on the plane for 20 minutes with powder from the so called bomb all over the cabin. The officers that boarded the plane did nothing to ensure our safety and did not check for accomplices or other explosive devices. Several passengers trampled through parts of the bomb as they exited the plane. We were then taken into the terminal with our unchecked carry on bags. Again, there was no concern for our safety even though Umar told the officers that there was another bomb on board as he exited the plane. I wondered why nobody was concerned about our safety, accomplices or other bombs and the lack of concern worried me greatly. I immediately told the FBI my story in order to help catch the accomplice I had seen in Amsterdam. It soon became obvious that the FBI wasn’t interested in what I had to say, which upset me further. For one month the government refused to admit the existence of the man in the tan suit before changing course and admitting his existence in an ABC News article on January 22, 2010. That was the last time the government talked about this man. The video that would prove the truth of my account has never been released. I continue to be emotionally upset that the video has not been released. The Dutch police, meanwhile, in this article (show article), also confirmed that Umar did not show his passport in Amsterdam which also meant that he didn’t go through security as both are in the same line in Amsterdam. It upsets me that the government refuses to admit this fact.
I became further saddened from this case, when Patrick Kennedy of the State Department during Congressional hearings, admitted that Umar was a known terrorist, was being followed, and the U.S. allowed him into the U.S. so that it could catch Umar’s accomplices. I was once again shocked and saddened when Michael Leiter of the National Counter terrorism Center admitted during these same hearings that intentionally letting terrorists into the U.S. was a frequent practice of the U.S. Government. I cannot fully explain my sadness, disappointment and fear when I realized that my government allowed an attack on me intentionally.
During this time, I questioned if my country intentionally put a known terrorist onto my flight with a live bomb. I had many sleepless nights over this issue. My answer came shortly thereafter. In late 2010, the FBI admitted to giving out intentionally defective bombs to the Portland Christmas Tree Bomber,the Wrigley Field Bomber and several others. Further, Mr. Chambers was quoted in the Free Press on January 11, 2011 when he indicated that the government’s own explosives experts had indicated that Umar’s bomb was impossibly defective. I wondered how that could be. Certainly, I thought, Al Qaeda wouldn’t go through all of the trouble to plan such an attack only to provide the terrorist with an impossibly defective bomb.
I attended nearly all of the pretrial hearings. At the hearing on January 28, 2011, I was greatly disappointed by the prosecution’s request to block evidence from Mr. Chambers “as it could then be able to be obtained by third parties, who could use it in a civil suit against the government”. It really bothered me that the government apparently was admitting to wrongdoing of some kind as it admitted that it was concerned it would be sued. It further upset me to know that the government was putting its own interests ahead of those of the passengers.
When I attended the jury selection hearings, I questioned why versions of the same two questions kept coming up, those being:
1. Do you think you’ll be able to tell whether something is actually a bomb?
2. Do you realize that sometimes the media doesn’t always tell the truth?
I continued to be greatly saddened at this point as I felt the truth continued to be hidden.
When Umar listed me as his only witness, I was happy to testify, not on his behalf, but on behalf of the truth. I never expected to testify, as my eyewitness account would have been too damaging to the myth that the government and media are putting forward. A mere 5 days after I was announced as a witness, there was an inexplicable guilty plea which exasperated me as I no longer would be testifying.
In closing I will just say that regardless of how the media and government try to shape the public perception of this case, I am convinced that Umar was given an intentionally defective bomb by a U.S. Government agent and placed on our flight without showing a passport or going through security, to stage a false terrorist attack to be used to implement various government policies.
The effect this matter has had on my life has been astounding and due to this case, I will never trust the government in any matter, ever.
Joined: 13 Sep 2006 Posts: 2557 Location: One breath from Glory
Posted: Wed Feb 22, 2012 5:48 pm Post subject:
wow! brave man but what will come of it? _________________ JO911B.
"for we wrestle not against flesh and blood but against principalities, against powers, against rulers of the darkness of this world, against wicked spirits in high places " Eph.6 v 12
CNN Airs Witness Testimony that 'Well Dressed' Indian accomplice helped Abdulmutallab board
without passport and that man on plane filmed entire flight and bombing attempt
Evidence is emerging that clearly indicates Abdulmutallab was able to board only with the help of an unidentified well dressed man seen at the boarding gate.
Kurt Haskell and his wife, who were witnesses on board Northwest Airlines Flight 253 saw Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab at the boarding gate in Amsterdam. Haskell told CNN that the accused bomber appeared strikingly 'poor' next to the well-dressed man he said was obviously wealthy and appeared to be of Indian ethnicity. According to Haskell, that man did the talking for him, explaining to the flight personnel at the gate that Abdulmutallab needed to board without a passport, claiming that he was a Sudanese refugee.
The gate attendee referred the odd-couple to the manager. Haskell said that was the last he saw of the wealthy man, but later recognized Abdulmutallab after the incident occurred on the plane. That's when he says he put two and two together about the unusual connection.
His wife found it 'odd' that authorities have not yet followed up on their witness account, as they were the only ones known to have witnessed Abdulmutallab with the 'Indian' man prior to boarding the flight.
If he had help getting on the flight with no passport after having been reported to the authorities by his own father, what is the true explanation for the man seen filming the entire flight? Another witness on board the flight, Richelle Keepman, said she noticed the cameraman at the beginning of the flight, believing the man might have been simply excited about a first flight, or etc. Later when the 'bombing' incident took place, she says the cameraman was the only one standing up, and intently filming the entire incident.
Put this together with the coinciding announcement that Yemen 'is the next front in the fight against Al Qaeda', the media's immediate hype of the event, and the ready-made Body Scanners and other 'enhanced' Airport security, it is clear that this is a contrived incident intentionally unleashed to goad renewed support for ever-expanding terrorism-related warfare in Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Sudan, prepatory talks about Iran, and now Yemen.
Just like after 9/11, airport travellers are again prepared to accept greater violations of their liberties and privacy for supposed security. Yet patsies and watchlist-subjects alike have repeatedly been allowed to bypass security clearance and been proven to have ties to the intelligence community.
The latest accused 'terrorist' Abdulmutallab was very likely the fallguy in a pattern-drill-- handled by wealthy, mismatched associates, allowed to board without required credentials, and videotaped by a cameraman with an unknown connection. Was Abdulmutallab involved with these figures through a drill which ended with an intentionally-failed bombing meant to incite great fear of terrorism?
This would fit closely with other elements of CIA-concocted "terrorism." Many of the 9/11 hijackers and other known extremists were revealed to have participated in 'dry run' drills, shared addresses with intelligence handlers or lived on military bases, were allowed to pass through the border despite being on one or more watchlists, and were given VISAS/Passports through execptions and/or special clearance.
We see a similar pattern here, the emerging evidence strongly suggests. How long will we allow deliberately-provoked terror incidents to frighten us to death, invade our privacy, erode our liberties, restrict our travel and perpetuate an ever-expanding string of wars?
Benjamin Franklin long ago warned us that "If we restrict liberty to attain security, we will lose both." And that those willing to make that bargain deserve neither their liberty nor security.
_________________ 'Come and see the violence inherent in the system.
Help, help, I'm being repressed!'
“The more you tighten your grip, the more Star Systems will slip through your fingers.”
(from another site)
US State Department Admits Underwear Bomber Allowed on Plane To (Supposedly) Help With Investigations into Al-Qaida
Posted on January 30, 2010 by Clare Swinney
From Lori’s Liberal Realm ***Please note that in the article that follows, I am not claiming that the U.S. Government knew Mutallab had a bomb or intended to hurt anyone on Flight 253 when the U.S. Government let him board.
THE SHARP DRESSED MAN WHO AIDED MUTALLAB ONTO FLIGHT 253 WAS A U.S. GOVERNMENT AGENT.
Since our flight landed on Christmas Day, Lori and I have been doing everything in our power to uncover the truth about why we were almost blown up in the air over Detroit. The truth is now finally out after the publication of the following Detroit News article:
“Patrick F. Kennedy, an undersecretary for management at the State Department, said Abdulmutallab’s visa wasn’t taken away because intelligence officials asked his agency not to deny a visa to the suspected terrorist over concerns that a denial would’ve foiled a larger investigation into al-Qaida threats against the United States.
“Revocation action would’ve disclosed what they were doing,” Kennedy said in testimony before the House Committee on Homeland Security. Allowing Adbulmutallab to keep the visa increased chances federal investigators would be able to get closer to apprehending the terror network he is accused of working with, “rather than simply knocking out one solider in that effort.”‘
Now it all becomes apparent. Let me detail everything we know about the “Sharp Dressed Man” (SDM).
1. While being held in Customs on Christmas Day, I first told the story of the SDM.
2. My story has never changed.
3. The FBI visited my office on December 29, 2009, and showed me a series of approximately 10 photographs. None were of the SDM. I asked the FBI if they brought the Amsterdam security video to help me identify the SDM, but they acted as though my request was ridiculous. The FBI asked me what accent the SDM spoke in and I indicated that he had an American accent similar to my own. I further indicated that he wore a tan suit without a tie, was Indian looking, around age 50, 6’0″ tall and 250-260 lbs. I further indicated that I did not believe that he was an airline employee and that he was not on our flight.
4. During the first week of January, 2010, Dutch Military Police and the FBI indicated that over “200 Hours” of Amsterdam airport security video had been reviewed and it “Shows Nothing”.
5. The mainstream media picked up the “Shows nothing” story, which slanders my story. After visiting my office twice for a flight 253 special, Dateline NBC and Chris Hanson indicated that my story was “Unsubstantiated rumor dispelled as myth” and our story did not air during the tv special.
6. On January 2, 2010, I receive a call from a flight 253 passenger who indicated to me that it may be in my best interest to stop talking publicly about the SDM because he believes I am “wrong” in what I saw. He did not make any claim that he saw the SDM boarding gate incident at all. This call was made out of the blue after he made a “revelation” of this event on January 1, 2010. I later discover that this caller has ties to the U.S. Government.
7. On January 20, 2009, current Director of the National Counterterrorism Center (NCTC), Michael E. Leiter, made a startling admission. Leiter indicated that: “I will tell you, that when people come to the country and they are on the watch list, it is because we have generally made the choice that we want them here in the country for some reason or another.”
8. On January 22, 2010, CongressDaily reported that intelligence officials “have acknowledged the government knowingly allows foreigners whose names are on terrorist watch lists to enter the country in order to track their movement and activities.”
CongressDaily also reported, citing an unnamed “intelligence official” that Michael E. Leiter’s statement on January 20, 2010, reflected government policy and told the publication, “in certain situations it’s to our advantage to be able to track individuals who might be on a terrorist watch list because you can learn something from their activities and their contacts.”
9. On Janury 22, 2009, ABC News published an article that shoed a change of position in the government’s official story. Please see the following blog post for more information:
The U.S. government provided no explanation for the reason my story was initially discounted.
10. The SDM could not be from Al Qaeda. When speaking at the counter in Amsterdam, the SDM said the following “He is from Sudan, we do this all the time”. Who is “we”? If it is Al Qaeda, you surely don’t make such a statement to an airposrt security official.
11. The SDM could not be from airport security. The SDM did not dress in any secuirty uniform and did not appear to have any security badge. The SDM did not speak with a Dutch accent. The SDM dressed in a suit coat and pants. If the SDM was a higher up security official, he would not have to convince the ticket agent to let Mutallab on the plane without a valid passport. Instead, he would just order her to do it.
12. Could the SDM have been a U.S. Government official? He dressed in a suit and not a security uniform. Check. He indicated we do this all the time. Could “we” be the U.S. Government? Check. He spoke Enlish with an American accent. Check. Would he need to convice the ticket agent that this was a normal procedure to allow boarding without a passport? Check. Would he have the ability to obtain such clearance? Check. Could he enter this security area even though he wasn’t a passenger? Check. Would the ticket agent likely refer this request to a manager? Check. Would the U.S. Government not want this information public and try to hide it? Check.
13. The Amsterdam security video has not been released. A much more minor airport security violation occurred at the Newark New Jersay airport several days after the flight 253 incident. That video was released shortly thereafter.
14. Senators Levin and Stabenow, as well as Congressman Dingle, all refuse to discuss the matter with me.
With the information we already knew and the admission from the above referenced Detroit News article, we have evidence and claims made by government officials that the U.S. Government wanted Mutallab to proceed into the U.S. in order to obtain information on other terrorists involved with him. Once we take this statement and add it to my eyewitness account of a “Sharp Dressed Man” escorting Mutallab through the boarding process and allowing him to baord without a valid passport we can make the connection that the “Sharp Dressed Man” was a U.S. Government offical/agent.
The reasoning behind the following events now becomes very clear:
1. The reason Mutallab got through security despite the numerous warnings for months before our flight.
2. The reason why there have been so many lies from the U.S. Government attempting to discredit my eyewitness account.
3. The reason why the Amsterdam airport security video is being hidden from the public.
4. The reason why the government is proposing a “Failed to Connect the Dots” account of the failure. The truth is too damning.
5. The reason why Mr. Wolf of the Obama administration indicated on the Keith Olberman Show that the White House was investigating a possible “intentional act” from within the U.S. Government as the reason for the Christmas Day attack.
6. The explanation for the cameraman and why he hasn’t been identified (Obviously, he was another U.S. Government agent) whose job was to film Mutallab for some governmental purpose.
7. The reason for the lax security after landing, which can be attributed to foreknowledge of the possible suspects involved.
8. The reason for the failure to search or secure the plane and passengers after landing, which can also be attributed to foreknowledge of the possible suspects involved.
9. The corporate media’s attempt to bury my eyewitness account.
10. Carl Levin’s, Debbie Stabenow’s and John Dingle’s intentional avoidance of my story and failure to return my calls/emails.
11. Janet Naploitano’s statement that “The System Worked”. From her point of view it probably did as this WAS PART OF THE SYSTEM!
This article is the big center piece of the puzzle that has been missing and was needed to finish the entire puzzle.
Research related links
Dutch Authorities Claim Underwear Bomber Had No Accomplice at Airport
Man Videotaped Underwear Bomber On Flight 253
Officials Claim Second Man Unrelated To Christmas Attack
Government Allowed Plane Bomber to Attempt Attack
Will the real Underwear Bomber please stand up?
Body Scanner Would Not Have Stopped Underwear Bomber
Gibbs: Don’t Disagree With Obama On Response to Underwear Bomber
Underwear Bomber Dazed, Stared “Into Nothing”
Kean Says Underwear Bomber “Did Us a Favor”
9/11 Commission Chairman: Plane Bomber “Did Us A Favor”
Corporate Media Claims Underwear Bomber Connected to al-Qaeda
Haskell Family: FBI has changed accounts 4 times; our story is the same since day one
_________________ 'Come and see the violence inherent in the system.
Help, help, I'm being repressed!'
“The more you tighten your grip, the more Star Systems will slip through your fingers.”
If you know about the underwear bomber case, this is all you need to read about it:
"But the prosecutor handling the case is Assistant U.S. Attorney Jonathan Tukel, who prosecuted the terror case against underwear bomber Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab."
Paul Harris and Ed Pilkington in New York - The Guardian, Wednesday 9 May 2012
A would-be "underwear bomber" involved in a plot to attack a US-based jet was in fact working as an undercover informer with Saudi intelligence and the CIA, it has emerged.
The revelation is the latest twist in an increasingly bizarre story about the disruption of an apparent attempt by al-Qaida to strike at a high-profile American target using a sophisticated device hidden in the clothing of an attacker.
The plot, which the White House said on Monday had involved the seizing of an underwear bomb by authorities in the Middle East sometime in the last 10 days, had caused alarm throughout the US.
It has also been linked to a suspected US drone strike in Yemen where two Yemeni members of al-Qaida were killed by a missile attack on their car on Sunday, one of them a senior militant, Fahd Mohammed Ahmed al-Quso.
But the news that the individual at the heart of the bomb plot was in fact an informer for US intelligence is likely to raise just as many questions as it answers.
Citing US and Yemeni officials, Associated Press reported that the unnamed informant was working under cover for the Saudis and the CIA when he was given the bomb, which was of a new non-metallic type aimed at getting past airport security.
The informant then turned the device over to his handlers and has left Yemen, the officials told the news agency. The LA Times, which first broke the news that the plot had been a "sting operation", said that the bomb plan had also provided the intelligence leads that allowed the strike on Quso.
Earlier John Brennan, Barack Obama's top counter-terrorism adviser and a former CIA official, told ABC's Good Morning America that authorities are "confident that neither the device nor the intended user of this device pose a threat to us".
US officials have said the plot was detected in its early stages and that no American airliner was ever at risk.
The FBI is conducting forensic tests on the bomb as a first step towards discovering whether it would have cleared existing airport scanning systems. Dianne Feinstein, the Democratic senator for California who heads the Senate intelligence committee, gave an early hint when she said that she had been briefed about the device which she called "undetectable".
But AP quoted an unnamed US official as saying current detection methods probably would have spotted the shape of the explosive in the latest device.
Just how major an escalation in threat is posed by the bomb remains unclear. Security sources have told news agencies that it was a step up in levels of sophistication from the original underwear bomb that was used in a failed attempt to blow up an airliner over Detroit on Christmas Day in 2009.
The device used a more refined detonation system, and Brennan said "it was a threat from a standpoint of the design".
When it comes to who made the device the focus is on an al-Qaida's offshoot, Al-Qaida in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP). Matthew Levitt, a counter-terrorism expert at the Washington Institute, said that the interception of the plot amounted to a significant achievement for US security agencies.
He said: "The FBI is holding the device, which suggests that this was done by having boots on the ground. This was a sophisticated operation that shows we are making in-roads in serious places."
Levitt, who was involved as a senior analyst in the FBI's investigation into 9/11, said that it was natural to be sceptical in a presidential election year about security announcements. "But this was not political, it didn't come from the White House and my sense was that it was a really unique success," he said.
Levitt said that the spotlight would now be even more intense on Ibrahim Hassan al-Asiri, AQAP's assumed bomb-making chief, who is thought to be hiding out in Yemen.
'Kurt Richard Haskell
Part 2 of Regarding “Sara” (Rebekah Roth/Monika Gainor)
YESTERDAY · PUBLIC
This article is a follow up to the article I wrote on December 22nd entitled "Regarding Sara (Rebekah Roth/Monika Gainor). Please read part 1 first if you have not already done so. You can read that article here:
Today is Christmas Day and the 6th anniversary of the incident that changed my life: the underwear bomber incident. If you are not familiar with my story, see here:
To most of you, the underwear bomber incident is just another in a long line of false flag events that you mix up with the shoe bomber incident. To me, it's the dividing line in my life. Whenever I think of anything in my past, I reference it as before or after this incident. Instead of enjoying Christmas like all other families do, I always have thoughts of that terrible day when my plane was on fire at 20,000 ft. I have not forgiven the CIA for its role in such plot and I never will. I consider the CIA the most vile organization in the world and believe it should be disbanded. After the underwear bomber incident, I was attacked relentlessly by the media and different government shills. I expect to be relentlessly attacked again after I post this article because I am exposing who I strongly believe is an intelligence asset. There will be denials, lies, attacks on me personally, hacks of my computer and various underhanded tricks played on me. I can take it.
I have been withholding the real name of Rebekah Roth, or “Sara” since the release of my first article on the subject 3 days ago. I was hoping that she would come forward and explain to everyone why she has been so deceitful. She has not done so, but has instead called me a troll, attacked my colleagues and attacked talknetwork.com where my show airs. Worst of all(even though I have only released her first name), Sara has released two of her other names herself saying we indicated that was her name (although she did add an “s” to the second name). The issue I have with this is such name is the name of a completely innocent person who lives in Grapevine, TX, not far from where "Sara" lives. I don't want this innocent person dragged into "Sara's" web of deceit. I have been hopeful that "Sara" was merely a con-artist or a habitual liar and not an intelligence asset. It is now my opinion that she is the latter. While researching "Sara" further, I came across two people that are tied to her in several different ways: Michael A. Harris and Koreann Ashlie (Nourani)(Harris). Last night, while doing further research on this subject, I discovered that my internet use is being monitored by the US Government. When I found an interesting clue on the way back machine, it was erased in real time, right before my eyes. I will explain more below. That was the final straw for me in convincing me that "Sara" is an intelligence asset and not something else. Lastly, as today is the 6th anniversary of the underwear bomber incident, I find myself questioning why I should hide the identity of an intelligence asset. The CIA has had nothing but a destructive effect on my life and tried to destroy me. Therefore, I have decided to release "Sara"/Rebekah Roth's real name. I discovered her through an insider tip. I have quite a bit more information on her that I'm still not yet going to release because it involves other members of her family.
As noted previously, "Sara" was involved in selling essential oils with the phixyourhealth team. "Sara" appeared in podcasts under the name "Monika Gainor". I don’t believe the picture of Monika Gainor is "Sara" but the voice is. In such videos, Monika Gainor appears with her co-host "Michael". The picture of Michael in such podcasts is the same picture of Michael A. Harris, the author of the book "Windsweeping". Windsweeping was published by KTYS Media. This publisher, KTYS Media has only published books written by Michael A. Harris and "Sara". Interestingly, in this interview with Cabana Talk, (a group that only existed a short time)
Michael A. Harris is interviewed about his book. In the interview, Michael A. Harris talks about how his book is fictional, but based on real life events. I think I have heard this somewhere before regarding somebody else's book. In this book, Michael A. Harris talks about how he developed a software program to determine if people are lying by compiling all data related to them. This sounds like something the CIA/NSA would do and by his own words, the book is based on real events.
In two Cabana Talk videos a person named "Kristina Sorensen" appears. Kristina Sorensen bears a striking resemblance to "Sara". While I can't say if it's 100% "Sara", it does appear to be her and we do have the Michael A. Harris connection.
What's fascinating is that in both videos, which are each about 9 minutes long, Kristina Sorensen doesn't say a word. She doesn't even state her name or say hello or anything. Why even have her in these videos? It's almost as if somebody did not want her voice tied to her appearance but wanted her likeness to be tied to this group. Strange.
Michael talks about how he is married to a Koreann Ashlie (Koreann Ashlie-Harris). I did find that such a person does exist. Koreann was born on Christmas Day 1951, which makes her 64 today.
Happy Birthday Koreann! On July 19, 1989, Koreann married an Iranian man named Seyed Mohammed Nourani Najafi.
I've been able to find only scant information on Seyed Nourani. I did find that he sold a piece of real estate in Washington state in 2013 though. I have been unable to find any divorce records for this marriage but I have to assume they exist somewhere. I do find it curious that she married an Iranian man as I know the US Government likes to use Middle Eastern people as intelligence assets. Apparently, sometime around 2009-2010, Korean Ashlie married Michael A. Harris and moved from Washington State to the Las Vegas area. In 2010, in their home county of Clark County, NV, both Michael and Koreann registered to vote at the same time.
Koreann Ashlie (Harris) was born in The State of Washington. "Sara" does not live in Nevada or Washington. So why is there a realtor listing in Bellevue, Washington for a Koreann Ashlie using the same picture of Monika Gainor (Alias of "Sara")?
Koreann Ashlie was a realtor in Washington state. Her license expired 6 years ago today. I thought it would be good to pull up her old website www.koreannashlie.com to see what I could find. The page no longer exists, so I checked the waybackmachine to see what it had on this website. The way back machine had screenshots of such page. One was in 2007 and one was in 2008. Both pages have an exceptionally large hole on the home page where it's likely a picture once existed.
I checked the 2008 page thoroughly and found no pictures of Koreann. I thought that this was extremely unusual since realtors always seem to have pictures of themselves on their websites. I then checked the 2007 page. Far to the right on the home page is a link that is not noticeable and says "site map". When I clicked on that, another page popped up with links and I pressed one near the bottom that said "virtual tour". Then a page popped up with a picture of "Monika Gainor". The same picture used by “Monika”/"Sara" in the essential oils podcasts. However, the name with the photo was Koreann Ashlie.
As soon as I pulled up the page with the picture, a large box appeared on my screen and blocked the bottom 1/2 of my screen. About 3/4's of the picture was still visible in the top 1/2 of the page. The box said something like "updating page" and it had the time and date, December 24, 2015. Before I could realize what happened, the entire page with the picture of Monika Gainor/Koreann Ashlie was erased. I was stunned! The waybackmachine takes screenshots of webpages at a particular time in history and does not update the pages, ever. This told me that not only was my internet being monitored by the US Government in real time but that it was actively working to destroy my investigation. It also confirmed in my mind that there is a high level intelligence connection here.
How and why were Koreann Ashlie and "Sara" both using the same photograph in their advertisements as two different people? In 2007, when she used this photo, Koreann Ashlie was 56 years old. The woman in the photograph that is supposed to be her is much younger. In 2011, when "Sara" was using such photo, "Sara" was 54 years old. Again, the woman in the photograph appears to be much younger than that. Therefore, it is my opinion that the "Monika Gainor"/"Koreann Ashlie" photo is likely a standard intelligence photo that is used to hide the identity of intelligence assets. Once again, we have a connection between Michael A. Harris, Koreann Ashlie and "Sara".
On September 22, 2011, Koreann Ashlie's mother, Dolores McQuade passed away. Here is the obituary:
In the obituary, three children of Dolores are referenced, including Koreann Ashlie (Kristy). Further, it is referenced that Dolores married her husband in 1949. Koreann was born in 1951. If Koreann Ashlie was born two years into this marriage, then why does she have the last name Ashlie and not McQuade? Further, please take note that the city where each son lives is referenced but the city where Koreann Ashlie lives is not mentioned.
In episodes of "Sara's" radio program a person named "Ramjet" is called the "co-pilot". The voice of Ramjet has been matched to the voice of Michael A. Harris. Michael A. Harris is the same co-host that Monika Gainor/ "Sara" had in her essential oils podcasts. Michael A. Harris also appeared in the Cabana tv podcasts as I believe "Sara" did under the alias "Kristina Sorensen". Michael A. Harris is also apparently (according to Clark County voter registration cards), married to Koreann Ashlie. Koreann Ashlie moved from Washington to Nevada right about this time. In her radio program, "Sara" often refers to "Ramjet" being in the same location with her. However, "Ramjet" is married to Koreann and lives far away from "Sara". It seems that these two have now teamed up in multiple events using one alias for Michael and numerous for "Sara". What is going on here? Are these two really experts on 9-11, or is there something else entirely going on? As my internet is being monitored in real time by the US Government and evidence is being deleted in real time from my computer, I am hoping others will come forward to further assist me in this investigation.
Although she has used 38 different versions of her real name (a few were cut off in the picture),
"Sara's" real name and address are:
Sara Rebecca Bulla Folger 605 Castleman Ct. Keller, TX 76248
She will attempt to lie and say this isn't her because there aren't pictures of her on the internet with this name. The picture of her in part 1 is from when she attended Texas Tech in the 1970’s. She lies about many things and will likely do so again. However, I have this information from an inside source . It is true. Please do not confuse this person with Becky Bertrand Folger of Grapevine, TX. She is a completely innocent person.
**Special thanks to the guys at truth frequency radio, which was the source of some of the pictures.
34 people like this.
View previous comments…
Should be ready in a couple of hours. Still need another hour to render and then however long to upload to youtube and process
3 · Report · Yesterday at 23:40
Yeesh... when Chris Geo sinks his teeth into things... he's OCD... so it will be thorough, I guarentee!
3 · Report · Yesterday at 23:41
You really should have a blog on your own domain Kurt. And, also should be video recording your screen during your investigations to show how you are being monitored.
1 · Report · Yesterday at 23:48
There is alot of people involved in the covert dissemination of propaganda from the government, even in alternative media outlets..... some "normal" activists and individuals have also been deceived by these government backed disinformation agents.
Edited · Report · Yesterday at 23:56
The worst kind of slut there is if this is all legit Kurt. ..I don't know you man but you're info is always bang on the money and we are always on the same page with things
1 · Report · Today at 00:14
Poisoned Well: Rebekah Roth - Methodical Illusion Deception Documentary
3 · Report · Today at 00:37
Thanks again Kurt.....the truth needed to be told
2 · Report · Today at 01:19
Amazing work I will share to expose this bitch now
2 · Report · Today at 01:21
Rachael L. McIntosh
1 · Report · Today at 01:44
She attended the International School of Kenya?https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_School_of_Kenya
International School of Kenya - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
1 · Report · Today at 01:50
Seems pretty certain that 'Rebekah Roth' (author of 'Methodical Illusion') is a government disinfo agent.
Interesting how the government were obviously monitoring Haskell's computer in real time, and deleted a page he had found with evidence on 'Rebekah Roth'.
Also that Kurt Haskell (the lawyer that testified about the 'underwear bomber' being escorted onto the plane without a passport) was so disgusted with with the CIA plot (as he recognised it as) that he left the States to live in Costa Rica, and became a 'Truther' investigator. _________________ 'And he (the devil) said to him: To thee will I give all this power, and the glory of them; for to me they are delivered, and to whom I will, I give them'. Luke IV 5-7.
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum