FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist  Chat Chat  UsergroupsUsergroups  CalendarCalendar RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

When the Queen dies will all hell break loose?
Goto page Previous  1, 2
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    9/11, 7/7 & the War on Freedom Forum Index -> General
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Whitehall_Bin_Men
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter


Joined: 13 Jan 2007
Posts: 2609
Location: Westminster, LONDON, SW1A 2HB.

PostPosted: Thu Jul 11, 2019 11:16 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Meghan Markle security order tennis fans not to take her picture at Wimbledon
https://www.metro.co.uk/2019/07/09/meghan-markle-security-order-tennis -fans-not-take-picture-wimbledon-10136984/

Meghan Markle security ‘order tennis fans not to take her picture at Wimbledon’

Mandatory Credit: Photo by Javier Garcia/BPI/REX (10327626gu) Meghan Duchess of Sussex watching Serena Williams on Court 1 Wimbledon Tennis Championships, Day 4, The All England Lawn Tennis and Croquet Club, London, UK - 04 Jul 2019
Meghan Markle’s security warned Wimbledon spectators against snapping pictures of the royal (Picture: Rex)
Share this article via facebookShare this article via twitterShare this article via whatsapp
Author image
Martine Berg Olsen
Tuesday 9 Jul 2019 12:58 pm
Since joining the Royal Family, Meghan Markle has imposed some strict privacy rules – especially when it comes to her and Prince Harry’s son Archie.

So, it was really no surprise that tennis fans were ‘ordered not to take pictures of the Duchess of Sussex’ when she made a surprise appearance in the royal box at Wimbledon on Thursday to watch pal Serena Williams play.

However, Meghan has been branded ‘childish’ and a ‘control freak’ after her security crew warned spectators at Court 1 against snapping images of her – even though 12,000 people were sat in the crowds and millions watched on TV.

One guest was told off by Meghan’s bodyguard for pulling up his phone, but could clearly be seen snapping a selfie of himself with the court in the background.


PR consultant Sally Jones was also given a lecture, but said the security staff was left ’embarrassed’ when she told them she was taking a picture of Serena and had not spotted the royal.

Jones, 64, who was seated on the same row as the duchess, told the Daily Mail, Meghan was ‘clearly looking around to see who was looking at her’.

Man appearing to take a selfie in front of Meghan Markle at Wimbledon
One man could be seen taking a photo close to Meghan… (Picture: Rex)
She told of the incident: ‘I felt a tap on my shoulder and was asked not to take pictures of the duchess – but I had no idea she was there until then. I was absolutely gobsmacked.’

Jones added: ‘There were around 200 photographers snapping away at her but security were sent to warn an old biddy like me. It makes them look silly. It’s childish and takes us for fools.’

Jones said it was ‘another example of silly control freakery’ after the couple faced backlash for deciding to keep Archie’s christening and godparents private.

Piers Morgan also joined in and said it was ‘absurd’ for Meghan to ‘demand privacy as she sits in the royal box on a publicly-funded jolly with her mates’.

Piers told Meghan to ‘go back to America’ if she wants to be treated as a private citizen on Tuesday’s Good Morning Britain.

Kensington Palace has not commented on the incident, but a royal source told the Telegraph: ‘It’s not unusual for people accompanying members of the Royal Family at private, or public, events to ask members of the public not to take photographs. It is to enable members of the Royal Family to engage with people and events.’

Man appearing to take a selfie in front of Meghan Markle at Wimbledon
… the move caused her bodyguard to jump up… (Picture: Rex)
Security talks to a man appearing to take a selfie in front of Meghan Markle at Wimbledon
… and ask him to stop… (Picture: Rex)

… however, the man was just snapping a selfie (Picture: Rex)

She made a surprise appearance to watch pal Serena Williams play (Picture: Rex)

Meghan was surrounded by free seats at Court 1 as she watched pal Serena Williams at the Wimbledon Tennis Championships (Picture: Rex)
As many as 40 seats surrounding Meghan were kept empty by her security team.


Meghan, who wore blue jeans, a blazer, sunglasses and a hat, was joined by close friends Genevieve Hillis and Lindsay Roth as they watched Serena beat Slovenia’s Kaja Juvan on Thursday.

It was believed she broke the Wimbledon etiquette with her denim outfit, but All England Club refused to comment and insisted she was ‘perfectly well dressed’.

She arrived at the tournament two days after sister-in-law Kate Middleton attended – amid rumours of a row between the two royal couples.

Kate was happy to sit among the crowds on Court 14 last Tuesday.


The Duchess of Cambridge watches the action on Court 1 with the AELTC Vice Chairman, Ian Hewitt (left) on day two of the Wimbledon Championships (Picture: PA)

Kate with Katie Boulter (left) and Anne Keothavong (right) as they watch Harriet Dart in at Court 14 (Picture: Rex)
MORE: MEGHAN MARKLE DUCHESS OF SUSSEX


Meghan Markle takes Archie to watch dad at polo with cousins George, Charlotte and Louis


Is Prince Harry telling off his wife?

_________________
--
'Suppression of truth, human spirit and the holy chord of justice never works long-term. Something the suppressors never get.' David Southwell
http://aangirfan.blogspot.com
http://aanirfan.blogspot.com
Martin Van Creveld: Let me quote General Moshe Dayan: "Israel must be like a mad dog, too dangerous to bother."
Martin Van Creveld: I'll quote Henry Kissinger: "In campaigns like this the antiterror forces lose, because they don't win, and the rebels win by not losing."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
TonyGosling
Editor
Editor


Joined: 25 Jul 2005
Posts: 16922
Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England

PostPosted: Thu Oct 17, 2019 10:44 pm    Post subject: Meghan Markle - terminator agent? Reply with quote

Meghan Markle - terminator agent?

The Hidden Nuclear Bomb Meaning of 007 Movie, "Thunderball"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gold_digger

A gold digger is a person, typically a woman, who engages in a type of transactional relationship[1] for money rather than love. When it turns into marriage, it is a type of marriage of convenience.

Today, the courageous British people are under attack from both the sex-hedonist, Rothschild Illuminati (Kubrick's "Eyes Wide Shut") for BREXIT refusing to pay $BILLIONS each year to the evil Bilderberg secret society, European Union (EU) and the American Military-Industrial-Intelligence, Congressional Complex (MILINDCOMP) stoical-violence-loving, Rockefeller Illuminati (Kubrick's "Dr. Strangelove") who have placed CIA sexpionage agent, gold digger and black racist, Meghan Markle (MM) --complete with fake baby--into the marriage arms of formerly-sound-military-officer-turned-drug-hedonist, Prince Harry to spy on and ruin the Royal Family and the UK's multi-billion dollar tourist industry. Those that grossly over-simplify the Illuminati as being totally united are constantly blind-sided by the viscious rivalry antics of the leftist and rightist factions catering to the sheeple's stoical or hedonist tendancies--vying for the character & control of the impending New World Order (NWO). The CIA's pro-Nazi traitor, war criminal (Operation SUNRISE/PAPER CLIP) and creator at the cost of conning Truman into wrongly disbanding the OSS, Allen Dulles placed Jackie into President John F. Kennedy's life as his wife to spy on him discretely as sex predator and stunningly-beautiful, Sharon Tate wife/baby murderer, Roman Polanski alludes to in his 2006 movie, Ghost Writer. Its no wonder the Ministry of Defense (MoD) is constantly broke and considering reducing its servicemen to an absurd 80K compared to the monstrously large and inept USMC populated by 200, 000 loud-mouthed incompetent egotists--who constantly whine they don't have enough moneies to stop wasting $BILLIONS on nonsense Precision Detonated Munitions (PDM) vulnerable 30 mph surface amphibious ships (google HMT Rohna) for instead 300 mph long-range seaplane transport/tankers that can actually get to global battlefields quickly.

007 Commandos: MC-130L HerkuSKIS Seaplanes

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yEkltTViAjY

The U.K. was betrayed after 1945 by the take-over of the USA by the pro-Nazi Rockefeller Illuminati faction's puppet POTUS Harry S. Truman witched out at the last minute for agricultural genius and decent human being, VP Henry Wallace--despite having helped America develop the atomic bomb. Using secret Swiss band account funds recovered from 2IC Nazi party leader Martin Bormann when Commander Ian Fleming, Royal Navy Volunteer Reserve (RNVR) and JAD's Royal Marine Commandos rescued him from Berlin in 1945, WW2-bankrupt Britain was somehow able to create their own atomic bombs as a deterrent against Rothschild-created, Soviet Russian attack & conquest.

James Bond is BORN: the True Story of Commander Ian Fleming

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G6z2Cm5mRdk

After the war, as a MI6-SIS master spy and propagandist, Fleming name-drops the RAF Vulcan bomber, Nassau and nuclear blackmail by S.P.E.C.T.R.E.--which really is an anagram for RESPECT--which is the main goal of the Nazi 4th Reich. In the 1961 book/1965 movie "Thunderball", the bomber has 2 x gravity nuclear bombs--which equivalates to the 2 x SkyBolt ASBMs which America reneged on their part of the development program at the Nassau conference--forcing them to give the RN Polaris SLBMs as a consolation prize--seen in the later James Bond films like "The Spy who Loved Me" in 1977.

Today, Rockefeller Illuminati Russian fear-mongers within the MILINDCOMP are whining about Russian "hypersonic weapons"--when we had Action Reaction Rockets (ARRs) back in the 1960s but because SAC bureaucrats were wings straight & level, pull-NO-G p****** not wanting to fly supersonic bombers like the B-58 and FB-111, ASBMs were not fielded. As soon as no one was looking, the supersonic B-58s and FB-111s were Type B personality, bureaucrats retired. Its a minor miracle the USAF owns & operates supersonic B-1B Lancer aka BONE heavy bombers--but without ASBMs. Vulcan bombers with SkyBolt ASBMs could have been camouflaged and hidden in the British isles to evade enemy targeting and able to take flight quickly to reach 1, 000 mile stand-off ranges avoiding having to fly into enemy SAM-infested, air defenses. SAC forward-basing its B-58s at remote locations in the CONUS was well-intentioned--but absurd since they would have had to be constantly air-refueled to reach Soviet Russia. SAC complained about B-58 lack of range when they could have been forward deployed in the UK like their slow, subsonic B-47s and B-52s and RAF Vulcans were--all of which could have been armed with SkyBolt ASBMs to solve their lack of enemy air space penetration problems. The Nazi CIA Gulag-murdered the USAF's best air reconnaissance experts by incendiary-bombing their unarmed, non-seaplane, C-124 Globemaster II transport resulting in the gaining control of U.S. spy flights from their NSA47 rival U.S. Air Force (USAF) in 1951.

CIA Sabotaged USAF C-124; 53 Men Lost to Soviet Gulags

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fWES7ojTqNA

If Brigadier General Cullen and his staff not been captured by the Soviet Navy to torture-live in their Gulags, a 7th Air Division of 509th Bomb Group (dropped atomic bombs on Japan in WW2, based in Roswell AFB where Nazi Anti-Gravity Craft aka flying saucers paid them a recce visit in '47) bombers was to be set-up in the UK to deter Communist aggression.

Got Space Access, UK?

The UK crop of captured Nazi rocket scientists Fleming warns about in Moonraker were clearly inferior to the highly-competent, von Braun liquid rocket fuel team Dulles brought over that empowered the U.S. Army until prevented from putting the 1st satellite into orbit [combatreform.org/warandpeaceinthespaceage.htm] and stamped out their solid rocket fuel Jack Parsons, Rothschild sex fiend rivals who live on in the JPL and techno-demented, Scientology religious cult popular in Hollywood. However, this wasn't enough trouble instigation for the evil FBI--who also has no Constitutional right to exist like the horrid CIA--they also alienated America's top Chinese ethnicity rocket scientist who fled to Communist China to start their ballistic missile and space program successful to the current day and poses an existential threat to America.

combatreform.org/airrecon.htm

Immediately after the war, clever UK scientists figured they could upgrade captured German V-2 ballistic missiles with a pressurized re-entry capsule and placed the 1st man into space. Drained constantly of funds by WW2 debts and the Rothschild Illuminati's lavish lifestyles, this promising MEGAROC project was cancelled. The main thing holding the UK back from being a world super power again is the parasitic Rothschild Illuminati sucking them dry.

British V-2 - How the U.K. Almost Won the Space Race

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wWFFzL65dEQ

Moreover, SkyBolt ASBM variants could shoot-down orbiting enemy satellites, place our own small satellites into space and launch MACH 5 aerospace spy planes like FISH using B-58's MACH 2 aerodynamic flight lift as the "1st stage". Vulcans could have destroyed the Stanley airfield runway better during the 1982 Falklands War with a huge SkyBolt ASBM bomblet payload than the tedious constant air-refueling needed to get them directly overhead to drop gravity HE bombs. Moreover, having SEAPLANE air refueling tankers can stay filled up by RN submarines and surface ships to extend RAF aircraft reach all over the world as the USN Tradewind tanker seaplane proved but failed because its faulty contraprop engines should have been instead powered by the proven British MAMBAs used successfully for years in their Fairey Gannett carrier-based ASW planes.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Avro_Vulcan

The origin of the Vulcan and the other V bombers is linked with early British atomic weapon programme and nuclear deterrent policies. Britain's atom bomb programme began with Air Staff Operational Requirement OR.1001 issued in August 1946. This anticipated a government decision in January 1947 to authorise research and development work on atomic weapons, the U.S. Atomic Energy Act of 1946 (McMahon Act) having prohibited exporting atomic knowledge, even to countries that had collaborated on the Manhattan Project.[4] OR.1001 envisaged a weapon not to exceed 24 ft 2 in (7.37 m) in length, 5 ft (1.5 m) in diameter and 10,000 lb (4,500 kg) in weight. The weapon had to be suitable for release from 20,000 ft (6,100 m) to 50,000 ft (15,000 m).[5]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GAM-87_Skybolt

At the same time, the Royal Air Force (RAF) was having problems with their MRBM missile project, the Blue Streak, which was long overdue [EDITOR: Fleming's warning in 1953 Moonraker that captured Nazi rocket scientists were sabotaging Britain's missile program]. Even if this was successful, it faced the serious problem of basing. No fixed land-based missile system could be credibly installed in the British Isles; they were well within the range of Soviet air strikes. The limited land mass available meant it would be relatively easy for missile sites to be spotted no matter what security measures were taken. Suitable locations for construction also carried a social and political cost. Fixed land-based ballistic missile sites need many thousands of acres per squadron (typically ten missiles); and the squadrons need to be apportioned over many thousands of square miles so that no single attack could conceivably destroy them all in one strike.

This left the deterrent based on their own bomber force, the V bomber fleet, which the RAF had already long concluded would be unable to penetrate Soviet defenses by about 1960. The RAF was in the process of introducing their own stand-off missile, the 950 kilometres (590 mi) ranged Mach 3 Blue Steel. While capable, the missile flew at altitudes and speeds that left it vulnerable to improving SAMs, and it had a number of reliability and serviceability issues that made it less than ideal. A faster, longer-ranged version was being designed, Blue Steel II, but it would be some time before it could enter service.

The long-range Skybolt would eliminate the need for both the Blue Streak and the Blue Steel II. Blue Steel II was canceled in December 1959 and the British Cabinet decided in February 1960 to cancel Blue Streak as well. Prime Minister Macmillan met [EDITOR: Rockefeller Illuminati puppet] President Eisenhower in March 1960 and agreed to purchase 144 Skybolts for the RAF. By agreement, British funding for research and development was limited to that required to modify the V bombers to take the missile, but the British were allowed to fit their own warheads and the Americans were given nuclear submarine basing facilities in [EDITOR: Faslane] Scotland.[4] Following the agreement, the Blue Streak program was formally canceled in April 1960 and in May 1960 an agreement for an initial order of 100 Skybolts was concluded.[4]

Avro was made an associate contractor to manage the Skybolt program for the United Kingdom and four different schemes were submitted to find a platform for the missile.[4] A number of different aircraft were considered, including a variant of the Vickers VC10 airliner and two of the current V bombers, the Avro Vulcan and Handley Page Victor.[4] It was decided to use the Vulcan to initially carry two missiles each on hardpoints outboard of the main landing gear.[4]

Development and testing

During development, it was decided that the system could not reach the required accuracy at the desired range without an update to the guidance system. This led to the introduction of a star tracker platform that would be used to further enhance the existing inertial navigation system. The system was capable of tracking bright stars in direct sunlight, a challenging requirement. This change meant that the missile could only be carried in locations where the front of the missile could continually observe the sky. This had always been the case on the USAF's B-52 bombers, where they were carried under the wings, but presented a problem for some of the UK designs. In the end, Skybolt was limited to the Vulcan.

By 1961, several test articles were ready for testing from B-52's, with drop-tests starting in January. In January 1961 a Vulcan visited the Douglas plant at Santa Monica, California, to make sure the modifications to the aircraft were electrically compatible with the missile. In Britain, compatibility trials with mockups started on the Vulcan.[4] Powered tests started in April 1962, but the test series went badly, with the first five trials ending in failure of one sort or another. The first fully successful flight occurred on 19 December 1962.[5]

Cancellation

By this point, the value of the Skybolt system in the U.S. had been seriously eroded. The Polaris had recently gone into service, with overall capabilities similar to Skybolt, but with "loiter" times on the order of months instead of hours. Additionally, the [EDITOR: large land mass] U.S. Air Force itself was well into the process of developing the Minuteman [solid rocket fuel, intercontinental ballistic] missile, whose improved accuracy reduced the need for any bomber attacks. [EDITOR: Secretary of Defense] Robert McNamara was particularly opposed to the bomber force [EDITOR: he served as a bombing target officer under General LeMay in WW2, go figure?] and repeatedly stated he felt that the combination of SLBMs and ICBMs would render them useless. [EDITOR: so much for the TRIAD's sound redundancy] He pressed for the cancellation of Skybolt as an unnecessary program.

The British, on the other hand, had canceled all other projects to concentrate fully on Skybolt. When McNamara informed them that they were considering canceling the program in November 1962, a firestorm of protest broke out in the House of Commons. Jo Grimond noted "Does not this mark the absolute failure of the policy of the independent deterrent? Is it not the case that everybody else in the world knew this, except the Conservative Party in this country?"[6] [EDITOR: former naval officer] President Kennedy officially cancelled the program on 22 December 1962.[1]

As the political row grew into a major crisis, an emergency meeting between parties from the U.S. and U.K. was called, leading to the Nassau agreement. Over the next few days, a new plan was hammered out that saw the U.K. purchase the Polaris SLBM, but equipped with British warheads that lacked the dual-key system. The U.K. would thus retain its independent deterrent force, although its control passed from the RAF largely to the Royal Navy. The Polaris, a much better weapon system for the U.K., was a major "scoop" and has been referred to as "almost the bargain of the century".[7] The RAF kept a tactical nuclear capability with the [EDITOR: gravity bomb] WE.177 which armed V bombers and later the Panavia Tornado force. The "Skybolt Crisis" was a major event in the eventual downfall of the Macmillan government.[citation needed]

A B-52G launched the last XGAM-87A missile down the Atlantic Missile Range a day after the program was canceled.[8] In June 1963, the XGAM-87A was redesignated as XAGM-48A[9]

****

Fleming's Nazi traitor, Hugo Drax in Moonraker is clearly embodied in today's rocket launch, Illuminati techno-industrialist, Elon Musk who works tirelessly for NWO goals--like planting an electronic 666 Mark of the Beast chip into all sheeple's brains to control them with TRANS-HUMANISM.

Musk's Neurolink Evil

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lA77zsJ31nA

666 = www = Mark of the Beast

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZUhHXkgibhQ

Musk has broken the high cost riddle of ARR booster rockets by cheap fuels and tail-sitter landing recovery desired from the first days of space exploration and seen in countless science fiction movies but not possible until the advent of precise computer controls. Like Drax in Moonraker, Musk holds a near monopoly on space access for the U.S. MILINDCOMP and NASA whose poorly-engineered Space Shuttle fleet was retired because the Illuminati has denied the world of a Single Stage-to-Orbit (SSTO), easy space access, SPACEPLANE because they don't want sheeple in space--lest they realize we all live in God's creation as per the 1611 King James Bible--and not the Satanic hell they plan for us. Nolan's "Interstellar" meekly raises secret space program AGC superior efficiency over white public-consumption, ARR question to make space colonization viable--but "Little Spaceship on the Prairie" to build sheeple character is violently opposed by the evil elites.

The evil CIA has sabotaged both Burt Rutan's 2-stage mothership plus spaceplane tourism project and the Russian Soyuz re-entry capsule docked to the International Space Station (ISS). Its way over-due to DISBAND THE CIA whose non-stop dirty tricks are revealed to the world like their disgusting recent illegal spying of President of the United States (POTUS) Trump's phone calls to play a nit-picking impeachment GOTYA! game. They have done far worse; murdering POTUS JFK in Dulles, Texas, his brother RFK running for that office, black civil rights leader MLK, Congressmen Hale Boggs, Nick Begich...and the late Jim Marrs suspected MI6-SIS master spy Ian Fleming himself on a golf course in 1964 lest he blow-the-whistle on the BS Dulles-misled, Warren Commission white-wash to his global 007 fan base.

More CIA Sabotage: No SPACEPLANES for You!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7GGb901I2_8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jt6cgUtp5qw

James Bond is REAL.

_________________
www.lawyerscommitteefor9-11inquiry.org
www.rethink911.org
www.patriotsquestion911.com
www.actorsandartistsfor911truth.org
www.mediafor911truth.org
www.pilotsfor911truth.org
www.mp911truth.org
www.ae911truth.org
www.rl911truth.org
www.stj911.org
www.v911t.org
www.thisweek.org.uk
www.abolishwar.org.uk
www.elementary.org.uk
www.radio4all.net/index.php/contributor/2149
http://utangente.free.fr/2003/media2003.pdf
"The maintenance of secrets acts like a psychic poison which alienates the possessor from the community" Carl Jung
https://37.220.108.147/members/www.bilderberg.org/phpBB2/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
TonyGosling
Editor
Editor


Joined: 25 Jul 2005
Posts: 16922
Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England

PostPosted: Tue Nov 26, 2019 1:48 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Battle of the Princes: Andrew character assassinated by Charles in royal succession battle?

Link

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PYMnjCeobDE
http://www.radio4all.net/index.php/program/104324
https://www.podomatic.com/podcasts/richieallen/episodes/2019-11-21T11_ 11_29-08_00

Furious Prince Charles to confront Prince Andrew over ongoing Epstein scandal
PRINCE CHARLES is expected to confront his brother Prince Andrew over his disastrous Newsnight interview, it was claimed today.
By ALICE SCARSI
PUBLISHED: 09:27, Mon, Nov 25, 2019 | UPDATED: 11:39, Mon, Nov 25, 2019
http://www.express.co.uk/news/royal/1208906/prince-charles-prince-andr ew-bbc-interview-epstein-scandal-royal-family-news

The Prince of Wales was said to be incensed not only by the content of the interview but the timing - as it clashed with Charles’ 12-day tour to India, New Zealand and the Solomon Islands this week and broke a long-standing tradition that one royal does not upstage another. Charles’ royal visit was intended to focus on environmental issues close to the Prince’s heart bit it was massively overshadowed by Prince Andrew’s now-notorious Newsnight interview and the backlash that followed.

The painful blow Queen dealt Prince Andrew in wake of royal retreat

Royal outrage: Prince William reveals true feelings on Prince Andrew
The Prince of Wales has remained tight-lipped throughout the tour, part of it carried out with Camilla, Duchess of Cornwall, over the Epstein scandal.

But it is understood Charles is gearing up for a showdown with his brother and is determined to get a grip on the situation once back to the UK to avoid any further fallout.

This comes after a Buckingham Palace source told the Mirror Prince Charles "will be having stern words" with Andrew upon his return from the tour.

PROMOTED STORY
Brighten That Smile With Affordable Dental Implants
Brighten That Smile With Affordable Dental Implants
(Yahoo! Search)
The source claimed: “The Queen has told Andrew he has her support but it is clear his brother Charles will be having stern words with him when he gets home.

prince charles prince andrew bbc interview epstein scandal royal family news
Prince Charles is expected to confront his brother Prince Andrew when he returns from his overseas tour (Image: GETTY)
prince charles prince andrew bbc interview epstein scandal royal family news

Prince Andrew's interview with Emily Maitlis aired on November 16 (Image: GETTY)
“Her very public show of support is a clear indication she has forgiven him but he has been ordered to keep in line. The inquests have already begun inside the Palace.

“Charles will demand to know how on earth this could have been allowed to happen, who was advising Andrew and why he was not consulted about his decision to go ahead with the interview.

“He has been ordered to step back from royal life until he has unequivocally cleared his name or the Epstein case is over, which could be years. The road to redemption might not only be long, it could be completely blocked off.”

READ MORE: Prince Andrew passes the baton to Eugenie and Beatrice

prince charles prince andrew bbc interview epstein scandal royal family news

The Queen and Prince Andrew were spotted horse riding on Friday (Image: REUTERS)
RELATED ARTICLES

Prince Andrew interview: ‘Palace needs to shut him down!’

Royal showdown: Furious Prince Charles to 'read riot act' to Andrew
Prince Andrew’s link to the scandal is not going away any time soon.

The BBC is scheduled to broadcast an interview with Virginia Roberts, who claims to have been trafficked for sex, in December.

Following the disastrous interview aired on November 16, in which Andrew failed to express sympathy for convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein’s victims or regret over their friendship, the Prince announced he was temporarily stepping down from public duties.

DON'T MISS
Shamed Andrew has ‘damaged monarchy’ - poll verdict on the Prince [POLL]
Prince Andrew fiasco sends chill through Royal Family’s Christmas [INSIGHT]
Prince Andrew interview done 'considerable damage to monarchy' [OPINION]
prince charles prince andrew bbc interview epstein scandal royal family news

Prince Charles and Camilla toured New Zealand last week (Image: GETTY)
prince charles prince andrew bbc interview epstein scandal royal family news

Prince Charles leaving the Solomon Islands this morning (Image: GETTY)
In recent days, as a growing number of companies said they would review their support to the Duke’s charities and organisations, Prince Andrew also stepped back from most of his patronages to avoid collateral damage.

While he will remain the patron of most organisations he has been supporting throughout the years, he will be taking no active part in them for the time being.

And, despite Buckingham Palace announcing last week the Duke would have continued to work on Pitch@Palace, his entrepreneurship scheme, it has been claimed Prince Andrew is also to cease any involvement in it.

This comes after 10 of the 35 companies backing the scheme withdrew their support and others announced they were reviewing it at the end of the year.

prince charles prince andrew bbc interview epstein scandal royal family news

Royal men and their military service (Image: EXPRESS)
Among the businesses who pulled out, there were KPMG, Standard Chartered and Bosch.

Prince Andrew, widely believed to be the Queen’s favourite child, was spotted horse riding with his mother on Friday on the grounds of Windsor Castle.

This outing was first seen as a show of unity and support.

However, the monarch is believed to have cancelled the lavish celebrations planned for Prince Andrew’s birthday, who turns 60 next February, The Times wrote.

Prince Andrew

Buckingham Palace said last week Prince Andrew will continue to work on Pitch@Palace (Image: GETTY)
TRENDING
Meghan Markle posts heartwarming Instagram update after receiving ‘special surprise’
Meghan Markle posts heartwarming Instagram update after receiving ‘special surprise’
Prince Charles and Camilla split: Why did Duchess return to UK as Charles continued tour?
Prince Charles and Camilla split: Why did Duchess return to UK as Charles continued tour?
Royal heartbreak: Kate and William send Twitter into meltdown with devastating update
Royal heartbreak: Kate and William send Twitter into meltdown with devastating update
Instead of throwing a party for Andrew, the Queen will host a small family dinner, the newspaper added.

The Epstein scandal could further worsen the relationship between the two brothers, believed to have been under strain since 2012, after Prince Charles announced his desire once King to slim down monarchy.

His intentions were made clear during the Diamond Jubilee celebrations, when wider members of the Royal Family were excluded from the symbolic appearance on the iconic Buckingham Palace balcony.

On the day, the only royals invited to stand next to the Queen were Prince Charles, Camilla, the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge and Prince Harry.

_________________
www.lawyerscommitteefor9-11inquiry.org
www.rethink911.org
www.patriotsquestion911.com
www.actorsandartistsfor911truth.org
www.mediafor911truth.org
www.pilotsfor911truth.org
www.mp911truth.org
www.ae911truth.org
www.rl911truth.org
www.stj911.org
www.v911t.org
www.thisweek.org.uk
www.abolishwar.org.uk
www.elementary.org.uk
www.radio4all.net/index.php/contributor/2149
http://utangente.free.fr/2003/media2003.pdf
"The maintenance of secrets acts like a psychic poison which alienates the possessor from the community" Carl Jung
https://37.220.108.147/members/www.bilderberg.org/phpBB2/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
TonyGosling
Editor
Editor


Joined: 25 Jul 2005
Posts: 16922
Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England

PostPosted: Tue Dec 03, 2019 10:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Queen ‘to retire in 18 months’ for Charles to become Prince Regent
https://metro.co.uk/2019/11/27/queen-retire-18-months-charles-become-p rince-regent-11228168/

Faye BrownWednesday 27 Nov 2019 2:39 pm

Queen Elizabeth is reportedly handing over her duties to her son Charles, the Prince of Wales, when she turns 95 (Picture: Reuters) Prince Charles is preparing to take over leadership of the Royals when the Queen turns 95, it has been reported.

The Queen’s oldest son met with his father at Sandringham yesterday to discuss the continuing fallout from his brother’s disastrous TV interview about his links to Jeffry Epstein. Prince Charles’ key role in ‘retiring’ Prince Andrew from public life has fed speculation he is preparing to become ‘shadow King’, which would see him control day-to-day royal affairs while his mother remains monarch.

Her Majesty will turn 95 in 18 months – the same age at which her husband Prince Philip withdrew from his public duties. There is talk among courtiers that she may use the milestone to allow her son to become Prince Regent, the Sun reports.

Prince Charlies is rumoured to be stepping in as ‘Prince Regent’ in 18 months if the Queen retires (Picture: Rex) It is believed he met with his father Prince Philip to discuss the plan yesterday (Picture: Rex) A royal source told the paper: ‘The scandal surrounding Andrew and Epstein gave Charles an opportunity to step in to show that he can run The Firm.

No one is bigger than the institution of the Royal Family. Not even Andrew, the Queen’s favourite son. ADVERTISING ‘Charles recognised that and acted decisively — like the king he may well soon be. This was the moment when Charles stepped up as Prince Regent, the Shadow King.’

The Queen has been gradually reducing the number of public engagements she attends from 332 in 2016 to a 283 in 2018. The Prince of Wales has been on an official tour of New Zealand but headed straight for the Queen’s Norfolk estate when he landed yesterday. It is believed Charles will also be discussing the fall out from Prince Andrew’s car crash Epstein interview

Philip, 98, spends most of his time at Wood Farm, a small residence on the estate. It is believed that Charles will seek his father’s advise over what the family should do next amid continued scrutiny over Prince Andrew’s links to billionaire paedophile Jeffry Epstein.

The Duke of York appeared on Newsnight earlier this month to discuss his controversial friendship, in what was described as a ‘car crash interview’.

Since then, he has been asked to take a step back from public duties while many charities he was a patron of have chosen to distance themselves from him. It is been reported that Charles wants Andrew to ‘permanently retire’ from his royal role.

It comes after it emerged that Prince William was reported to be involved in the decision to sack the Duke of York. The second in line to the throne is said to believe that the decision to get Andrew to withdraw from public duties was ‘the right thing to do’.


Read more: https://metro.co.uk/2019/11/27/queen-retire-18-months-charles-become-p rince-regent-11228168/?ito=cbshare

_________________
www.lawyerscommitteefor9-11inquiry.org
www.rethink911.org
www.patriotsquestion911.com
www.actorsandartistsfor911truth.org
www.mediafor911truth.org
www.pilotsfor911truth.org
www.mp911truth.org
www.ae911truth.org
www.rl911truth.org
www.stj911.org
www.v911t.org
www.thisweek.org.uk
www.abolishwar.org.uk
www.elementary.org.uk
www.radio4all.net/index.php/contributor/2149
http://utangente.free.fr/2003/media2003.pdf
"The maintenance of secrets acts like a psychic poison which alienates the possessor from the community" Carl Jung
https://37.220.108.147/members/www.bilderberg.org/phpBB2/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
TonyGosling
Editor
Editor


Joined: 25 Jul 2005
Posts: 16922
Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England

PostPosted: Tue Dec 03, 2019 10:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Royal revelation: Why Prince Charles may never become King Charles III
PRINCE CHARLES will one day take over the British throne from his mother Queen Elizabeth II, but the Prince of Wales may never be known as King Charles III. Here’s why.
By AMALIE HENDEN
PUBLISHED: 07:31, Tue, Dec 3, 2019 | UPDATED: 07:32, Tue, Dec 3, 2019
https://www.express.co.uk/news/royal/1211535/prince-charles-news-regna l-title-king-royal-family-queen-elizabeth-ii-abdicate

Prince Charles will see change in attitude when King says expert
Play Video

Prince Charles, as the current monarch Queen Elizabeth II’s eldest son, will one day take over the British throne. The Prince of Wales has been the heir apparent since the age of three, when his mother was proclaimed Queen in 1952. But the Prince may never become King Charles III.

RELATED ARTICLES

Queen Elizabeth II shock: Can the Queen STOP Camilla becoming Consort?

Will Queen give Charles THIS title when she step down in 18 MONTHS?
The reason Charles might not become King Charles III is because he is free to choose his own regnal title.

Though most monarchs of the United Kingdom have used their first baptismal name as their regnal name, on three occasions monarchs have chosen a different name.

First, Queen Victoria had been christened Alexandrina Victoria, but took the throne under the name Victoria.

King Edward VII, Victoria’s eldest son, chose Edward as his regnal title, although he had been known by his first name of Albert.

PROMOTED STORY
Never Overpay Again - This Tool Finds Every Voucher Code on the Internet
Never Overpay Again - This Tool Finds Every Voucher Code on the Internet
(Honey)
READ MORE: Prince Charles title: Will Charles change his name when he is King?

Royal revelation
Royal revelation: The Prince of Charles may never become King Charles III (Image: GETTY)
Royal revelation

Royal revelation: Prince Charles crowned Prince of Wales by Queen Elizabeth II (Image: GETTY)
READ MORE

Revealed: How Prince Philip ‘never wanted royal title’
In 1936, after the abdication crisis, Prince Albert, Duke of York, assumed the throne as King George VI rather than "King Albert".

His full name was Albert Frederick Arthur George; like Edward VII and Victoria he used another of his names.

There has been speculation the Prince of Wales, whose full name is Charles Philip Arthur George, may elect not to be known as "Charles III”.

This is reportedly out of concern to be compared with Charles II of England, who was known for his Catholic sympathies or Charles I of England, who was executed after the English Civil War.

Instead of becoming King Charles he might choose to become King George VII, King Philip, or King Arthur.

Royal revealtion

Royal revealtion: Prince Charles crowned Prince of Wales by Queen Elizabeth II (Image: GETTY)
Who were the other King Charles?
King Charles I of England

Charles I was born on November 19, 1600, and died in 1649).

He was King of England, King of Scotland, and King of Ireland from March 27, 1625, until his execution in 1649.

DON'T MISS
Prince Andrew family tree: Inside the family of the Queen's son [MAP]
Queen family tree: A FULL look back at the Queen’s HUGE family [INSIGHT]
The bizarre ritual Prince Charles carries out whenever he plants trees [VIDEO]

RELATED ARTICLES

How Prince Charles shares Dracula’s blood line

Prince Philip revelation: Duke's shocking connection to Russia
READ MORE

Prince Harry row: How Queen could control Duke's decisions
Charles was born into the House of Stuart as the second son of King James VI of Scotland, but after his father inherited the English throne in 1603 (as James I), he moved to England, where he spent much of the rest of his life.

He became the heir apparent to the three kingdoms of England, Scotland and Ireland in 1612 on the death of his elder brother Henry Frederick, Prince of Wales.

After his succession in 1625, Charles clashed with the Parliament of England, which sought to curb his royal prerogative.

King Charles I believed in the divine right of kings, and was determined to govern according to his own conscience.

Royal revelation

Royal revelation: Line of succession to the British throne (Image: EXPRESS)
King Charles II

Charles II was King of England, Scotland and Ireland.

He was king of Scotland from 1649 until his deposition in 1651, and king of England, Scotland and Ireland from the 1660 Restoration of the monarchy until his death.

King Charles II was the eldest surviving child of Charles I of England Scotland and Ireland and Henrietta Maria of France.

TRENDING
Royal heartbreak: Meghan Markle drops devastating Christmas update on Instagram
Royal heartbreak: Meghan Markle drops devastating Christmas update on Instagram
Queen Elizabeth II shock: How Her Majesty’s death will spark an unusual chain of events
Queen Elizabeth II shock: How Her Majesty’s death will spark an unusual chain of events
Royal row: How Princess Eugenie could be FORCED to move out of Kensington Palace home
Royal row: How Princess Eugenie could be FORCED to move out of Kensington Palace home
During Charles II reign, however, England entered the period known as the English Interregnum or the English Commonwealth, and the country was a de facto republic led by Oliver Cromwell.

The King fled to mainland Europe and spent the next nine years in exile in France.

But a political crisis that followed the death of Mr Cromwell in 1658 resulted in the restoration of the monarchy, and Charles was invited to return to Britain.

Charles II was one of the most popular and beloved kings of England, known as the Merry Monarch.



PrinceCharlesWilliamExpres.jpg
 Description:
Daily Express headline that made Charles VERY ANGRY
 Filesize:  159.03 KB
 Viewed:  6 Time(s)

PrinceCharlesWilliamExpres.jpg



_________________
www.lawyerscommitteefor9-11inquiry.org
www.rethink911.org
www.patriotsquestion911.com
www.actorsandartistsfor911truth.org
www.mediafor911truth.org
www.pilotsfor911truth.org
www.mp911truth.org
www.ae911truth.org
www.rl911truth.org
www.stj911.org
www.v911t.org
www.thisweek.org.uk
www.abolishwar.org.uk
www.elementary.org.uk
www.radio4all.net/index.php/contributor/2149
http://utangente.free.fr/2003/media2003.pdf
"The maintenance of secrets acts like a psychic poison which alienates the possessor from the community" Carl Jung
https://37.220.108.147/members/www.bilderberg.org/phpBB2/


Last edited by TonyGosling on Wed Dec 04, 2019 12:01 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
TonyGosling
Editor
Editor


Joined: 25 Jul 2005
Posts: 16922
Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England

PostPosted: Tue Dec 03, 2019 10:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Prince Charles snub: Prince William should be next king, claims expert - royal bombshell
PRINCE William should be the next king rather than his father Prince Charles as he is “more royal”, an expert has claimed.
By LAURA MOWAT
PUBLISHED: 00:00, Mon, Jun 24, 2019 | UPDATED: 00:37, Mon, Jun 24, 2019
https://www.express.co.uk/news/royal/1144308/Prince-charles-prince-wil liam-future-king-most-royal-queen-royal-news

Royal ancestry expert Matt Baker claimed Princess Diana is from a more “royal bloodline” than Prince Charles, which also makes the Duke of Cambridge “more royal” than his 70-year-old dad. Prince Charles is the first in line to the throne and will succeed his mother Queen Elizabeth II, who is the longest-reigning British monarch, when she abdicates or dies.

ADVERTISING

inRead invented by Teads


RELATED ARTICLES

How Charles told Camilla he wanted to ‘live inside her trousers'

Meghan's split from William and Kate 'symbolic' of something 'deeper'
The historian told the Daily Star: “She has more English royal blood in her veins than does Prince Charles, her 16th cousin once removed.

“All of it flowing from illegitimate unions.

PROMOTED STORY
Find the best anti-aging cream deals
Find the best anti-aging cream deals
(Yahoo! Search)
“Four of her ancestors were mistresses to English Kings.”

Queen and Prince Charles and Prince William

The Queen has been the country's longest ever reig (Image: GETTY )
Mr Baker claimed the Spencer family tree goes back to Charles II and James II.

Whereas Prince Charles, he argued, is a product of the “illegitimate” bloodline. He is therefore less royal than Princess Diana, making his children more royal than him.

Royal family trees are often very closely related to each other and Prince Charles and Diana are no different, the pair were 7th cousins once removed.

The Palace has constantly insisted that Princes Charles’ wife, Camilla Parker Bowles, will become Princess Consort when he takes the throne signalling she would decline the title of Queen.

Prince William and Prince Charles

The royal expert has claimed William is "more royal" than Charles (Image: GETTY )
Prince William will inherit his father’s title of the Prince of Wales and his estate when he becomes King.

Charles became Prince of Wales at the age on nine in 1958 and he was formally given the title in 1969 by the Queen.

Queen Elizabeth became the monarch in 1952 at the age of 25 when her father, King George VI passed away. At the time, Prince Charles was just three years old.

Prince Charles wants 'different role' as monarch says expert
Play Video

In April 2018, Prince Charles was appointed as the QUeen’s successor as Head of the Commonwealth.

Delivering a speech at Buckingham Palace to the leaders of the Commonwealth, Her Majesty the Queen said: "It is my sincere wish that the Commonwealth will continue to offer stability and continuity to future generations, and will decide that one day the Prince of Wales should carry on the important work started by my father in 1949."

_________________
www.lawyerscommitteefor9-11inquiry.org
www.rethink911.org
www.patriotsquestion911.com
www.actorsandartistsfor911truth.org
www.mediafor911truth.org
www.pilotsfor911truth.org
www.mp911truth.org
www.ae911truth.org
www.rl911truth.org
www.stj911.org
www.v911t.org
www.thisweek.org.uk
www.abolishwar.org.uk
www.elementary.org.uk
www.radio4all.net/index.php/contributor/2149
http://utangente.free.fr/2003/media2003.pdf
"The maintenance of secrets acts like a psychic poison which alienates the possessor from the community" Carl Jung
https://37.220.108.147/members/www.bilderberg.org/phpBB2/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    9/11, 7/7 & the War on Freedom Forum Index -> General All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2
Page 2 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group