FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist  Chat Chat  UsergroupsUsergroups  CalendarCalendar RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

David Mayer de Rothschild on Alex Jones 7-5
Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    9/11, 7/7 & the War on Freedom Forum Index -> The Bigger Picture
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Me
Moderate Poster
Moderate Poster


Joined: 16 Jul 2006
Posts: 431

PostPosted: Fri Sep 29, 2006 5:15 am    Post subject: David Mayer de Rothschild on Alex Jones 7-5 Reply with quote

From the Dino Costa show.

Hour 1

Hour 2

Quote:
Michael Berger is also director of the new movie, Improbable Collapse, co-written with Rebecca Cerese, award-winning documentary filmmaker (February 1: The Story of the Greensboro Four). The movie addresses the demolition of the towers on 9/11, with the concurrent demolition of our Republic.

Matthew Rothschild recently authored Enough of the 9/11 Conspiracies, Already, published on September 11, 2006 at the Progressive.org.

Dino Costa introduces Mr. Rothschild as believing, "any talk about a coverup are [sic] wrong and irresponsible."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
festival of snickers
Mind Gamer
Mind Gamer


Joined: 04 Apr 2007
Posts: 723
Location: the worlds greatest leper colony usa

PostPosted: Fri Jul 06, 2007 4:27 pm    Post subject: David Mayer de Rothschild on Alex Jones 7-5 Reply with quote

Rothschild on alex jones 7-5

his ranting at the start is unreal

at least he could have waited maybe 20 minutes into an interveiw

_________________
Puzzling Evidence
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RinF8BiDNaU
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
GazeboflossUK
Validated Poster
Validated Poster


Joined: 13 Sep 2006
Posts: 312
Location: County Durham, North-East

PostPosted: Fri Jul 06, 2007 4:32 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Rothschild is also claiming a lot of things that Alex doesn't actually think himself.


David Mayer de Rothschild

_________________
www.myspace.com/garethwilliamsmusic
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
Fallious
Moderate Poster
Moderate Poster


Joined: 27 Oct 2006
Posts: 762

PostPosted: Fri Jul 06, 2007 6:48 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Got a link for this? Sounds like fun.
_________________
"Thought is faster than arrows, and truth is sharper than blades." - David Gemmell | RealityDown wiki
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
flamesong
Major Poster
Major Poster


Joined: 27 Jul 2005
Posts: 1305
Location: okulo news

PostPosted: Fri Jul 06, 2007 7:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Maybe this file will allow you to hear a repeat stream.

It should do if you unzip it and open it with VLC.

It should allow you to listen to any Alex Jones show whenever it is on.



Alex Jones.pls.zip
 Description:
Alex Jones.pls - zipped

Download
 Filename:  Alex Jones.pls.zip
 Filesize:  309 Bytes
 Downloaded:  130 Time(s)

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
festival of snickers
Mind Gamer
Mind Gamer


Joined: 04 Apr 2007
Posts: 723
Location: the worlds greatest leper colony usa

PostPosted: Fri Jul 06, 2007 7:18 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

i google" alex jones shortwave" when i wanna listen to to the replay


http://www.infowars.com/listen.html

_________________
Puzzling Evidence
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RinF8BiDNaU
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Fallious
Moderate Poster
Moderate Poster


Joined: 27 Oct 2006
Posts: 762

PostPosted: Fri Jul 06, 2007 7:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanks chaps!
_________________
"Thought is faster than arrows, and truth is sharper than blades." - David Gemmell | RealityDown wiki
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
festival of snickers
Mind Gamer
Mind Gamer


Joined: 04 Apr 2007
Posts: 723
Location: the worlds greatest leper colony usa

PostPosted: Fri Jul 06, 2007 7:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

jones acts like all the rothschilds think alike

i just dont know -or what the one on today believes about stuff really

tell me if you can

on the surface it looks like jones made a fool of himself on his show

i dont know really

_________________
Puzzling Evidence
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RinF8BiDNaU
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
flamesong
Major Poster
Major Poster


Joined: 27 Jul 2005
Posts: 1305
Location: okulo news

PostPosted: Fri Jul 06, 2007 8:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Alex Jones and Paul Watson don't do themselves any favours when they launch into global warming denial rants. I have no problem with any religions but they are both Christians and there is a movement within Christian Fundamentalism which believes that we should not try to impede the Apocalypse - and some go to obscene lengths to hasten it. There was a fascinating documentary about a year or so ago which illustrated this very poignantly.

And Paul Watson gets no sympathy as far as his portrayal as smokers as victims since the recent ban. The parallels are startling.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Sherlock Holmes
Validated Poster
Validated Poster


Joined: 10 Sep 2006
Posts: 205
Location: Sunny Southampton

PostPosted: Fri Jul 06, 2007 9:43 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

festival of snickers wrote:
jones acts like all the rothschilds think alike

i just dont know -or what the one on today believes about stuff really

tell me if you can

on the surface it looks like jones made a fool of himself on his show

i dont know really


I don't think Alex made a fool of himself. Being ENGLISH, I think the Rothschild guy sounded like an arrogant stuck up private school boy.
I don't know how it is in Seattle, well actually I do I went for a meeting at the University of Washington last year. But in America owning land and farming isn't a big deal, but I can tell you this, people in England don't own farms and don't have the money to own land and farm and live beside nature, like Rothschild does. So where did this Rothschild get all his money from - hard work no doubt, grafting on building sites.

That Rothschild guy is a W*NKER.. Global warming is a hoax and a scam for instituting a carbon tax and imposing restrictions on travel nothing more. This is total neo-feudalism. I remember reading an article in the Ecologist magazine 15 years ago (funded by the millionaire Goldsmith family) about a proposed Carbon Tax and Carbon Credits. What is this deju-vu, did these gusy predict the future or what?

Chemical pollution from big industry, overcrowding, drugs and alcohol abuse, lack of decent housing, lack of sanitation, lack of education, lack of health care are the big social/environmental issues. Global warming is a smoke screen (pun intended) issue. The nitrogen based ice caps on mars are also melting...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Cruise4
Validated Poster
Validated Poster


Joined: 12 May 2007
Posts: 292

PostPosted: Fri Jul 06, 2007 11:20 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

global warming denial rants - whats the problem here? Global warming, Denial or Ranting? CO2 led Global warming is absolute rollocks!

they are both Christians... which you then relate to not impeding the apocalypse, despite you 'not having a problem'. Are you saying they are Christian Fundamentalists who are doing everything they can to hasten the Apocalypse? Ridiculous!

Obscene lengths... you sound like the mainstream media exagerating terror attacks.

"no sympathy as far as his portrayal as smokers as victims " The nazis did the same thing before WW2. Smokers ARE victims. Smoking was frowned upon until some NWO type linked smoking to feminist freedoms. If someone wants to smoke then its his 'right' as long as he doesn't impinge on others rights. I have yet to see any conclusive proof that passive smoking causes cancer although it may exist. If true then limitations on that persons freedoms are genuinely justifiable. But there is no doubt that they represent a soft target to set the scene before they move on to the Protestants, or the mentally ill, or the disfigured, or the 911 truthers etc. and as such they should be supported and asked to support us.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
festival of snickers
Mind Gamer
Mind Gamer


Joined: 04 Apr 2007
Posts: 723
Location: the worlds greatest leper colony usa

PostPosted: Sat Jul 07, 2007 3:08 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

jones said millions will be hung i think when he takes over

so where does this Rothschild say he wants to kill people?does he believe in a one child policy?

maybe the rockefellers are proven scum as Russo says and they made commie china

_________________
Puzzling Evidence
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RinF8BiDNaU
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
festival of snickers
Mind Gamer
Mind Gamer


Joined: 04 Apr 2007
Posts: 723
Location: the worlds greatest leper colony usa

PostPosted: Sat Jul 07, 2007 3:20 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

and i sort of like ron paul as jones does but doesn't ron paul believe in libertarianism?

they believe in not helping the disabled i think ,, he would cut off everyone off welfare and medicine and they would be in streets? ill have to check into it

Elisabeth de Rothschild reportedly died of epidemic typhus on March 23, 1945, at Ravensbrück, though other sources, including the memoirs of Philippe de Rothschild, state that she was thrown alive into a crematory oven.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elisabeth_de_Rothschild

so is that untrue? so why would the Rothschilds like Nazism!!!

_________________
Puzzling Evidence
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RinF8BiDNaU
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
blackcat
Validated Poster
Validated Poster


Joined: 07 May 2006
Posts: 2376

PostPosted: Sat Jul 07, 2007 3:36 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

http://www.nw0.info/?p=Radio/Alex%20Jones%20Radio%20Archive/2007/July/

2007-07-06.mp3 - right click and "save target as ... " to listen to Alex Jones show.

The most interesting part I thought was between about one hour and one hour thirty minutes where the woman who grew up during Hitler's rise to power in Austria gave her views on what is happening in the USA today. She makes the comparison and it is frightening how history is repeating itself.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
festival of snickers
Mind Gamer
Mind Gamer


Joined: 04 Apr 2007
Posts: 723
Location: the worlds greatest leper colony usa

PostPosted: Sat Jul 07, 2007 6:37 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

i think its dumb how jones acts like its so weird usa would have a base in iraq when the kurds want us and weve had damn bases in germany ,japan and Korea for 60 years

i have no more interest in listening to jones much even though i guess im against usa being in iraq and im not a bush fan really

_________________
Puzzling Evidence
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RinF8BiDNaU
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
festival of snickers
Mind Gamer
Mind Gamer


Joined: 04 Apr 2007
Posts: 723
Location: the worlds greatest leper colony usa

PostPosted: Sat Jul 07, 2007 6:42 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

im sure jones rantings today will just rake in the votes for ron paul

oh sure!

he sounded like a total crackpot even if that Rothschild is a total creep-maybe he is

where is the proof though?

_________________
Puzzling Evidence
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RinF8BiDNaU
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
flamesong
Major Poster
Major Poster


Joined: 27 Jul 2005
Posts: 1305
Location: okulo news

PostPosted: Sat Jul 07, 2007 10:57 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Cruise4 wrote:
global warming denial rants - whats the problem here? Global warming, Denial or Ranting? CO2 led Global warming is absolute rollocks!
That's your considered opinion? Based on what? Your need to live in a perpetuated debt driven consumer bubble, probably.

Cruise4 wrote:
they are both Christians... which you then relate to not impeding the apocalypse, despite you 'not having a problem'. Are you saying they are Christian Fundamentalists who are doing everything they can to hasten the Apocalypse? Ridiculous!
Yes, they are both Christians. But not all Christians are fundamentalist. A bit like not all Muslims and Catholics are terrorists. The documentary which I saw interviewed some Christian fundamentalists who saw it as their duty to pollute - they were quite explicit about this - and saw driving the biggest 'fück off' trucks as integral to that. Now, if they, being Christian fundamentalists, believe that such activity will bring on the Apocalypse - why should a belief that not doing so might prevent such a catastrophe be contrary?

Cruise4 wrote:
Obscene lengths... you sound like the mainstream media exagerating terror attacks.
You clearly didn't see the documentary.

Cruise4 wrote:
"no sympathy as far as his portrayal as smokers as victims " The nazis did the same thing before WW2. Smokers ARE victims. Smoking was frowned upon until some NWO type linked smoking to feminist freedoms. If someone wants to smoke then its his 'right' as long as he doesn't impinge on others rights. I have yet to see any conclusive proof that passive smoking causes cancer although it may exist. If true then limitations on that persons freedoms are genuinely justifiable. But there is no doubt that they represent a soft target to set the scene before they move on to the Protestants, or the mentally ill, or the disfigured, or the 911 truthers etc. and as such they should be supported and asked to support us.
Yes, I actually agree that smokers are victims - but not of a ban on them polluting other peoples' bodies but of the multinational tobacco companies. I know all about 'torches of freedom' etc. But that you see this kind of industry PR exploitation as some kind of martyrdom of smokers on behalf of humanity is perverse. I have no problem with people smoking just as I have no problem with people sticking red hot needles in their own eyes.

And just because I generally believe in industry fuelled climate change (as opposed to CO2 fuelled global warming) does not necessitate my subscription to the risible initiatives which exploit rather than solve it.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
mason-free party
Moderate Poster
Moderate Poster


Joined: 30 Jul 2005
Posts: 765
Location: Staffordshire

PostPosted: Sat Jul 07, 2007 11:08 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

flamesong...Earthfirst is an illuminati front organisation...true or false?
_________________
http://www.mindcontrolforums.com/pro-freedom.co.uk/part_6.html
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
flamesong
Major Poster
Major Poster


Joined: 27 Jul 2005
Posts: 1305
Location: okulo news

PostPosted: Sat Jul 07, 2007 11:21 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

mason-free party wrote:
flamesong...Earthfirst is an illuminati front organisation...true or false?

You are using the Fox/Sky News tactic of asking accusatory questions.

I don't know the answer to your question. Perhaps if you provide some evidence with your accusations, they may be considered with a little more credulity than the wild speculation the exude.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Cruise4
Validated Poster
Validated Poster


Joined: 12 May 2007
Posts: 292

PostPosted: Sat Jul 07, 2007 2:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

"industry fuelled climate change " thats a new one.... could you explain what this phrase refers to?

CO2 level change lags 800 years behind temperature change. Changes in Ocean temperature can take 1000 years to propogate out. The earth IS NOT a closed system, A GREENHOUSE IS. ALL the planets in the Solar System are heating up from SOLAR ACTIVITY. Polar Bears can swim 300 miles and often swim 100 miles for food. CO2 levels in atmoshere = 0.038%. A spike in the amount of carbon dioxide released into the atmosphere between 2001 and 2003 appears to be a temporary phenomenon and apparently does not indicate a quickening build-up of the gas in the atmosphere, according to an analysis by NOAA climate experts. Climate modelling is NOT SCIENCE nor acurate. Records began just before the Little Ice Age that marked a temperature low that we are now moving out of. The period we have records for are is so short as to virtually make it worthless. Ice cores show we have had constant Climate Change throughout history. What effect does HAARP have? Climate Research Unit at the University of East Anglia, that for the years 1998-2005 global average temperature did not increase. There is much more that could be said.
RE. Pollution... a different issue. I don't produce any. The monopolistic corporations produce it. The Governments ensure its a problem. Pollution problems mostly stem from the people voting in criminals that couldn't give a monkeys about them or this planet. The fact that these same people believe every fat lie about Climate Change doesn't suprise me. People should worry less about the planets ability to deal with itself and instead look at the scum they vote into power. Now that WOULD have some effect on all these issues. Now would all those people dying to give Rothschild and co. even more money please line up in front of me!

"Your need to live in a perpetuated debt driven consumer bubble, probably"... I ensure my income is low enough so that I pay no tax. To do this requires "debt driven consumer bubble" stays well away from me.

Sun: More activity since 1940 than in previous 1150 years, combined

Mercury: Unexpected polar ice discovered, along with a surprisingly strong intrinsic magnetic field … for a supposedly “dead” planet

Venus: 2500% increase in auroral brightness, and substantive global atmospheric changes in less than 30 years

Earth: Substantial and obvious world-wide weather and geophysical changes

Mars: “Global Warming,” huge storms, disappearance of polar icecaps

Jupiter: Over 200% increase in brightness of surrounding plasma clouds

Saturn: Major decrease in equatorial jet stream velocities in only ~20 years, accompanied by surprising surge of X-rays from equator

Uranus: “Really big, big changes” in brightness, increased global cloud activity

Neptune: 40% increase in atmospheric brightness

Pluto: 300% increase in atmospheric pressure, even as Pluto recedes farther from the Sun

“climate change” phenomena are occurring, not just here on Earth, but, in fact -- throughout the entire solar system.

Now obviously I don't have the wherewithall to do the research myself or go round visiting the people that do. But taken as a whole and given the NWO antics I feel fairly confident that CO2 led Global Warming is hogwash. As this is how the NWO types began the mass debate I am now suspect of all their manipulatory evolution of the terms used.

Climate Change is going on, as it always does, but man is not the cause and man's arrogance will not affect the outcome either.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
flamesong
Major Poster
Major Poster


Joined: 27 Jul 2005
Posts: 1305
Location: okulo news

PostPosted: Sat Jul 07, 2007 3:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Cruise4 wrote:
"industry fuelled climate change " thats a new one.... could you explain what this phrase refers to?

I was an environmentalist long before it became fashionable and hijacked by buzz-word toting politicians and PR consultants, so don't be a smart arse.

You have given a detailed excuse for why you don't need to do anything. Brilliant!

Real environmentalists don't advocate carbon trading, carbon taxing and various other money-spinning schemes which will be in the pipeline. They actually promote the sort of thing which would threaten the very people that climate change deniers, like yourself, often accuse of driving the issue. In reality, the more 'environmentally friendly' you really are the less currency you circulate. In a nutshell, if you think that money is the solution you don't understand the problem.

The real threat to the planet is the mentality of exploitation that drives people to find a means of making profits from crises.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
festival of snickers
Mind Gamer
Mind Gamer


Joined: 04 Apr 2007
Posts: 723
Location: the worlds greatest leper colony usa

PostPosted: Sat Jul 07, 2007 3:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

im sort of confused here

jones says its ok to use a lot of oil and global warming isnt really going on?

well taking out oil from earth could cause earthquakes and who wants to be Dependant on other nations for oil

no one answered me if Rothschild is some sort of evil eugenicist and can it be proven

are you also for a one child policy?i think thats sick

_________________
Puzzling Evidence
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RinF8BiDNaU
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
festival of snickers
Mind Gamer
Mind Gamer


Joined: 04 Apr 2007
Posts: 723
Location: the worlds greatest leper colony usa

PostPosted: Sat Jul 07, 2007 4:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

flamesong wrote:
Cruise4 wrote:
"industry fuelled climate change " thats a new one.... could you explain what this phrase refers to?

I was an environmentalist long before it became fashionable and hijacked by buzz-word toting politicians and PR consultants, so don't be a smart arse.

You have given a detailed excuse for why you don't need to do anything. Brilliant!

Real environmentalists don't advocate carbon trading, carbon taxing and various other money-spinning schemes which will be in the pipeline. They actually promote the sort of thing which would threaten the very people that climate change deniers, like yourself, often accuse of driving the issue. In reality, the more 'environmentally friendly' you really are the less currency you circulate. In a nutshell, if you think that money is the solution you don't understand the problem.

The real threat to the planet is the mentality of exploitation that drives people to find a means of making profits from crises.



so alex jones thinks its no big deal to use more oil? the indians in oklahoma were killed to get the oil--corrupt officials would kill them then make the children orphans then control the land -this was land they were given when driven off land from the east coast in usa -so they were screwed twice

this was a real conspiracy done by evil gov or judges 70 years ago as you can read in angie debo books

the station jones is on endlessly talks about how great it is to own gold while indians are killed in brazil to get that gold

i wonder if any prince charles or rothschild is concerned with this?no one is helping the exploited much just yammering nonsense in my opinion

capitalize on the wind and we will all be rich

yet the station he is on does promote solar power i think

ive spent two years hearing alex jones and i dont think i want to spend all summer listening to all that nonsense - but i guess i should listen if he can predict things or so he says

_________________
Puzzling Evidence
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RinF8BiDNaU
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
John White
Site Admin
Site Admin


Joined: 27 Mar 2006
Posts: 3172
Location: Here to help!

PostPosted: Sat Jul 07, 2007 4:44 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Flamesong wrote:
Real environmentalists don't advocate carbon trading, carbon taxing and various other money-spinning schemes which will be in the pipeline. They actually promote the sort of thing which would threaten the very people that climate change deniers, like yourself, often accuse of driving the issue. In reality, the more 'environmentally friendly' you really are the less currency you circulate. In a nutshell, if you think that money is the solution you don't understand the problem


Excellent comment Flamesong

It deifes my belief, I have to admit, to see how easily apparently awake and street smart people (talking conspiracy sites generally) can't see when the elite are trying to hijack a bandwagon

as far as this interview goes, AJ's chronic emotionalism pi*sed this interview up against the wall, and rothschild ran rings around him like the pompous buffoon AJ increasingly reduces himself to

_________________
We are not a community looking to believe: We are a community dedicated to seeing what is

Enjoy the View from the Hills:
http://malvernmessages.free-forums.org/malvernmessages.html
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
marky 54
Mega Poster
Mega Poster


Joined: 18 Aug 2006
Posts: 3293

PostPosted: Sat Jul 07, 2007 5:29 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

festival of snickers wrote:
im sort of confused here

jones says its ok to use a lot of oil and global warming isnt really going on?

well taking out oil from earth could cause earthquakes and who wants to be Dependant on other nations for oil

no one answered me if Rothschild is some sort of evil eugenicist and can it be proven

are you also for a one child policy?i think thats sick


i don't know about a one child poilcy but i think there needs to be a restriction on the amount of children each couple has.

people are living longer these days and the birth rate is much higher than the death rate, its obvious they want to reduce the population and i'd rather it be through this way than rounding people up and murdering them. a one child poilcy might be sick but out of the options for population reduction its the best most human one.

i dont support it but out of the options and knowing/thinking population reduction is whats driving them to do what they are doing i'd rather it be a one child policy than anything else untill the population was reduced.

at least that way every living being gets to play out there life naturally and those who are here now have a future.

so don't think im saying i agree with it, im just saying we may not have a choice and out of the options they could use i'd rather them use this method. those who have more than one child instantly cannot have anymore, but are allowed to raise the children they do have as normal, whilst anyone starting from a certain date cannot have more than 1 child.

eventually the population will reduce without murder of innocent people.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Cruise4
Validated Poster
Validated Poster


Joined: 12 May 2007
Posts: 292

PostPosted: Sat Jul 07, 2007 7:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

"industry fuelled climate change " thats a new one.... could you explain what this phrase refers to?"

Not smartass - I don't understand the phrase. Its the first time I've ever seen it... hence the question?

What are you promoting that threatens the very people causing the issue?

"You have given a detailed excuse for why you don't need to do anything"
What king canute style proposals do you suggest?

Given what I said earlier how do you arrive at the conclusion I'm a Climate Change Denier? I'm saying the reasons for Climate Change are well beyond man's ability to influence at present, and the reasons often given for Climate change are based on bad science or outright lies.

Alex Jones no longer believes in Peak Oil. He may be right, we will have to see. There are some odd things that happen with oil production at times. Some say they went into Iraq to 'Cap' the Oil and stop an independant production of.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Cruise4
Validated Poster
Validated Poster


Joined: 12 May 2007
Posts: 292

PostPosted: Sat Jul 07, 2007 8:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

the station jones is on endlessly talks about how great it is to own gold

Well it is if the cash economy goes down the pan. They are adverts.

Re: the one child policy...
I know nothing about this subject but I'd bet if you examine the figures it would be the poor and exploited with the highest birth rates. Immigrants maybe also have higher rates. The point I'm making is the NWO have for many many years put in place unnatural human situations, for example the war against the 3rd world.

I suspect if we didn't have all this messing about with creating communism, the fall of communism, world wars, food additives, conspired food shortages, bad medicines and 1001 other things these people have unaturally set up then the birth rate would 'naturally' adjust to what the environment can support.

And then there's getting into space.

I didn't hear Rothschild make a single point, but Alex did not argue his case very well either. I'll agree with that.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
festival of snickers
Mind Gamer
Mind Gamer


Joined: 04 Apr 2007
Posts: 723
Location: the worlds greatest leper colony usa

PostPosted: Sat Jul 07, 2007 8:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

marky 54 wrote:
festival of snickers wrote:
im sort of confused here

jones says its ok to use a lot of oil and global warming isnt really going on?

well taking out oil from earth could cause earthquakes and who wants to be Dependant on other nations for oil

no one answered me if Rothschild is some sort of evil eugenicist and can it be proven

are you also for a one child policy?i think thats sick


i don't know about a one child poilcy but i think there needs to be a restriction on the amount of children each couple has.

people are living longer these days and the birth rate is much higher than the death rate, its obvious they want to reduce the population and i'd rather it be through this way than rounding people up and murdering them. a one child poilcy might be sick but out of the options for population reduction its the best most human one.

i dont support it but out of the options and knowing/thinking population reduction is whats driving them to do what they are doing i'd rather it be a one child policy than anything else untill the population was reduced.

at least that way every living being gets to play out there life naturally and those who are here now have a future.

so don't think im saying i agree with it, im just saying we may not have a choice and out of the options they could use i'd rather them use this method. those who have more than one child instantly cannot have anymore, but are allowed to raise the children they do have as normal, whilst anyone starting from a certain date cannot have more than 1 child.

eventually the population will reduce without murder of innocent people.


how would you enforce people not having children?the Netherlands is a densely populated country and around 1970 anyway, had a low crime rate

people arent really a problem-its the desire to own a car and a bigger house and more cell phones etc and to eat junk food

im 52 and still dont own a car,yet i have a drivers license still

_________________
Puzzling Evidence
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RinF8BiDNaU
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
festival of snickers
Mind Gamer
Mind Gamer


Joined: 04 Apr 2007
Posts: 723
Location: the worlds greatest leper colony usa

PostPosted: Sat Jul 07, 2007 9:03 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

i dont think ill ever listen to alex jones ever again because of his Rothschild show

Ive had pretty much my fill of this character

i think hes either mentally ill or totally arrogant or stupid

life is too short to waste my time

_________________
Puzzling Evidence
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RinF8BiDNaU
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
elohim
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter


Joined: 27 Nov 2006
Posts: 76
Location: Ipswich

PostPosted: Sun Jul 08, 2007 9:49 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
i don't know about a one child poilcy but i think there needs to be a restriction on the amount of children each couple has.


Why do you think that this is so?

Quote:
people are living longer these days and the birth rate is much higher than the death rate


This is bogus. The birth rates have fallen over the last 100 years, this is in terms of both male fertility rates (which has dramitcally fallen) Mysteriously (COUGH COUGH) and total fertility rates (the number of children a woman can theoretically have in her liftime)

Instead, the rates of growth of the world population result primarily from declining mortality levels, particularly among infants and children, most especially among developing countries.

Generally the brith & death rates are measured by the differance between the 2, so if birth rates & death rates are the same you would have zero popualtion growth.

Quote:
i dont support it but out of the options and knowing/thinking population reduction is whats driving them to do what they are doing i'd rather it be a one child policy than anything else untill the population was reduced.


Oh so it's love of their fellow man which is driving them to reduce the population for the benefit of everyone, let me bow down & kiss the ring of everyone of these freaks....

Population control (eugenics or mass murder) has been the long term aim of the pyscopaths. Employing the likes of Russell, Huxley & other scientific think tanks they have been pushing the idea to reduce the population long before there was a supposed problem.

During the last century they even managed to get a number of states in the US to pass laws forcibly sterilise certain unwanted groups of people.

We should not forget or be naive enough to think that Hitler came up with the ideas of eugenics or mass murder, his ideas did not entirley spring from his own warped mind, but rather, came directly from these "think tanks" in the United States, with IBM even helping with the equipment.

I was reading some documents from one of these elite funded think tanks a while back and their solution for poverty was NOT to play fair and tackle the causes of poverty, but to simply get rid of the poor people.

Quote:
so don't think im saying i agree with it, im just saying we may not have a choice and out of the options they could use i'd rather them use this method.


You be sure to pass that on to them, that you don't mind living in a police state world, as long as they are not too evil & physcopathic.

This is not a edition of the quiz the eggheads or a multi choice school exam, no options acceptable if you value your freedom.

Their population control program is a multi faceted attack, under the guise of womens rights, reproduction health services. That's not to mention vacinations & other chemicals being pumped into our body.

Dont think it's all so subtle though will you, the Ministry of defence recently published a forward looking report into the next 10 - 20 years.

One paragraph really sticks out, it reads:

"Neutron weapons WILL be used for extreme ethnic cleansing, for the purposes of POPULATION CONTROL"

Think carefully who would (already does) have such a weapon.

It's NOT the working class or middle class people & it certainly wont be a tin pot country like Iran or North Korea, assuming the havent been assimulated by the Central Banks by then.

No it's the elite driven & run countries, come on just die nicely....

EL
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    9/11, 7/7 & the War on Freedom Forum Index -> The Bigger Picture All times are GMT
Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
Page 1 of 3

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group