FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist  Chat Chat  UsergroupsUsergroups  CalendarCalendar RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

ARK and EIM - legal threat - threads hidden
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    9/11, 7/7 & the War on Freedom Forum Index -> Other Controversies
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Caz
Last Chance Saloon
Last Chance Saloon


Joined: 23 Apr 2006
Posts: 819

PostPosted: Mon Dec 17, 2007 7:25 pm    Post subject: ARK and EIM - legal threat - threads hidden Reply with quote

This video shows how EIM Consult and EIM Group are related. Remember, ARK is now running three schools in London and looking for at least 12. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RiJEQwzB760 Remember, the chairman of EIM Group and the chairman of ARK is the same person.

What this demonstrates is the evidence on the www.pehi.eu website (Project for the Exposure of Hidden Institutions) that EIM (European Institute of Management) grew out of the PIO (Public Information Office) which is described as 'a fascist "personal" Military Intelligence group that spied on journalists that had a negative attitude towards the Vanden Boeynants gang'. Vanden Boeynants was specifically named in the Dutroux child sex, torture, murder scandal in Belgium first reported in the main stream media in 1996. The perpetrators of this scandal were never caught, considered to have been protected by the 'paedophile lobby'.

From: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/belgium/1456107/Judge -tells-of-murder-plots-to-block-Dutroux-investigation.html

Quote:
"The file talks of seizure of children, foreign trafficking, and perhaps even of cells, if I remember well," Judge Connerotte said. ….."The sum of 150,000 francs [£2,500] was mentioned as the price for girls. I was struck by the richness of these documents. Any magistrate should have acted the way I did later."…. The girls apparently starved to death in the dungeon while Dutroux was in prison for 106 days…….In January 1996 Judge Connerotte wrote to King Albert alleging that his investigations into crime networks were being blocked because suspects "apparently enjoyed serious protection"……He went on to say that the "dysfunctional judiciary" was breaking down as mafia groups took secret control of the "key institutions of the country"….."You would have thought that the Dutroux dossier was so serious that investigators would do everything in their power to discover the truth," Judge Connerotte said….."But exactly the opposite happened. Rarely has so much energy been spent opposing an inquiry."

It states on the PEHI website that 'Col. Rene Mayerus, a good friend of Major Jean Bougerol (the protege of de Bonvoisin and Vanden Boeynants and accused by X1 of being involved in the child abuse network) became administrative-director of EIM.' The EIM website (www.eimconsult.com) clearly states under 'Who we are' that they are EIM Group. They have an interest in 'Human Re-engineering', 'Perceptions' for which they claim to have a registered trade-mark, 'Behavioural Change', and 'More nursing time for nursing staff'. Under 'Guaranteed Results' it states that the Chairman is Jean-Pierre Etter, although this is a document which has been scanned in, and so would not appear on a search. Clicking on 'Home' on the www.eimconsult.com website takes you to EIM Group. Chairman Arpad Busson. This person is also Chairman of ARK (Absolute Return for Kids) who now control three schools in London and are looking to control 12 in the UK. The website www.eimconsult.com has now been reconstructed and the link between the two EIM companies has now been broken. However, this recording was made some weeks ago and demonstrates the relationship between the two companies. We are in a situation now where there are vaccinations at gun-point in the US http://www.nineeleven.co.uk/board/viewtopic.php?t=12422

Quote:
Following the State of Maryland's threats against parents who refuse to have their children vaccinated, children were herded into a Price George County courthouse being guarded by armed personnel with attack dogs. Inside, the children were forcibly vaccinated, many against their will, under orders from the State Attorney General, various State Judges and the local School Board Director, all of whom illegally conspired to threaten parents with imprisonment if they did not submit their children to vaccinations.

We have New Philanthropy Capital (created by Goldman Sachs staff) producing documents such as ‘The Children’s Plan’ presented to the public by Ed Balls:

Quote:
The Children’s Plan has been prompted by concerns that academic progress in England’s schools has stalled, amid a more general public unease about the state of childhood in Britain, with fears about the pressures on children to grow up too fast in an increasingly menacing environment.
And academies teaching vocational courses to suit the sponsors: http://www.nineeleven.co.uk/board/viewtopic.php?t=12265 The ‘menacing environment’ has been created by schools’ sponsors, the banking elite, state judges and the likes of BBC staff who feel to write up such rubbish as is on the Teens website, encouraging children to grow up far too quickly.

Correction: I have had it pointed out to me that there were two documents produced at this time; the one by New Philanthropy Capital concerned itself with a report about outside school hours activities on the school site, not with police or social services on the premises.

from: http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/life_and_style/education/article30314 06.ece

Quote:
The move coincides today with research which suggests that children from deprived areas gain the most from after-school clubs but are often excluded because they cannot afford to pay for them.

The report, from the charity New Philanthropy Capital, said that state funding often paid only for schemes to be set up and not for running costs.


Last edited by Caz on Mon Nov 17, 2008 9:09 pm; edited 6 times in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
kbo234
Validated Poster
Validated Poster


Joined: 10 Dec 2005
Posts: 2017
Location: Croydon, Surrey

PostPosted: Mon Dec 17, 2007 9:06 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Excellent research and video.

Well done Caz!

Some of us already knew that there are fiends at work who are busy corrupting and debasing the English education system and everyone inside it.

I have believed for some time that these people are those that direct the think-tanks. These bodies are funded by bankers and keep generating ever-more-idiotic and demoralising policies. The 'government' that we elect are merely the Sales & Marketing Department for these people. In truth the individuals at the top of the government we elect are not even chosen by ourselves but by these banking interests.

Now it would appear that we can see that there are degenerates at the highest level who are (self-professedly) working on a project of mass mind control....


......and that these same people already have 3 English schools in their fat paws.

Teachers. Wake Up!!!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Caz
Last Chance Saloon
Last Chance Saloon


Joined: 23 Apr 2006
Posts: 819

PostPosted: Tue Dec 18, 2007 3:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanks KBO. Make sure you pass it on, and we don't have any more ludicrous articles in the MSM about what a wonderful thing academy and trust schools are. I notice a peculiar comment made by Sir Cyril Taylor: http://education.guardian.co.uk/newschools/story/0,,1704196,00.html
Quote:
"The whole building side has been a nightmare," he said. "Most of the 27 already open are OK. There are some outstanding ones, but there are some we shouldn't repeat."

Sir Cyril singles out for criticism the £31m Bexley Business academy in Kent, designed by Sir Norman Foster, which was once described by the prime minister as "the future of education". It proved a hit with architects but less popular with teachers as they contended with classrooms with just three walls and an open side, and a stock exchange style "trading floor".

Sir Cyril called the design "crazy" and added: "I would never have built that building," he said. "You can't teach in that, so we're filling [the open sides] in.

"We're not going to have any more glass palaces. We're going to have functional buildings built of brick. Glass is hot in the summer, freezing in the winter. People can look through it and nasties throw bricks at it. And you don't have balconies on schools, anybody can tell you that."

He promised "no toilets in nasty dark areas" in future academies.


Maybe he's woken up a little to what is going on with these 'schools'. A comment I heard recently was that an architect felt that what they are now building as schools in the south-west of England look more like prisons.

Makes you wonder.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Marie
Validated Poster
Validated Poster


Joined: 19 Dec 2007
Posts: 9

PostPosted: Wed Dec 26, 2007 4:17 pm    Post subject: ARK and HOPES AND HOMES Reply with quote

ARK's website - ARK funding Hopes and Homes:

ARK’s work with Hope and Homes for Children (HHC) in Romania closed seven orphanages in just three years, placing 1,100 children into families or family-type care and preventing another 600 children from entering the institutional system. Partnership with government means that the costs of ongoing care are covered from public funds.
http://www.arkonline.org/projects/residential_pages/romania.html

Hope and Homes' website:

Closing Institutions - We have developed a
de-institutionalisation model which is now
being replicated in other counties with a view
of being applied at national level in the future.
We have closed down an institution for infants and set up supporting services for families which means that no other infant in Maramures county will enter the institutional system again.
http://www.hopeandhomes.org/romania.htm

And here the press release about their cooperation.
http://www.arkonline.org/resources/B0629-ARKPressRelease.pdf

Not a word on cooperation with ARK.

And both ARK and HOPES AND HOMES remain silent about the 60 million Euro project of the European Union that financed most of the de-institutionalisation of children in Romania.
You can read all about that in
Romania - for export only
www.romania-forexportonly.eu
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Caz
Last Chance Saloon
Last Chance Saloon


Joined: 23 Apr 2006
Posts: 819

PostPosted: Wed Feb 27, 2008 2:09 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Although Eim Consult and Eim Group are called European Institute of Management and European Investment Managers respectively and were founded in different years, I find it extraordinary in the extreme that a company of the magnitude of Eim Consult should send potential customers to a completely different company when they click on the 'home' link. This is phenomenally bad for business and it beggars belief that such an error could have occurred. Unless, or course, they are closely associated. It is irrelevant if the two companies call themselves by different names and are founded in different years; that one has been diverting inquiries to the other is what is significant.

I have heard that on ringing Eim Consult, people were told they had the 'wrong number' and the business address in London, although giving an impressive photograph on their website, is actually a post-office box. This is deceit. You either operate from a building or you don't. You can hardly be mistaken. At the moment the Eim Consult website is not operating at all. (www.eimconsult.com). However, they have moved to another location, and maintain an interest in 'human re-engineering', and profitability enhancement: http://www.parabolic.be/eim/whoweare_eim_uk.htm

One of my concerns with the original EIM Consult website was the mention that they would provide 'more nursing time for nursing staff'. I did wonder if they meant something like this:
from: http://www.injusticeline.com/strouds.html
Quote:
Fifty nine sixth grade girls were instructed to strip to their underwear and wait for a genital examination that was part of a state mandated physical. Sixteen of the girls started to cry and some asked to call their parents. The school nurse called them ``babies'' and refused to let them call home.

One 11 year old, Susie Tucker, wouldn't take no for an answer. ``I want to call my mother. My mother wouldn't want you to do this to me,'' she said. Her pleas fell on deaf ears. One nurse was reported to have blocked the door so that none of the girls could escape.

The physician reportedly put the girls in a room and had them lie down on a table, spread-eagled, with nothing covering them. Susie Tucker's mother, Katie, said, ``The girls had no idea what they were doing. The doctor didn't talk to them. She just did the genital exam and didn't say one word. All my daughter could do was stare up at the ceiling. And it hurt. It still hurts.''


The evidence on the internet for a 'Jean-Pierre Etter', chairman of EIM Consult, is scanty indeed. A Jean-Pierre Etter is mentioned as having written a book: 'Start small, grow big, stay human and conquer the world.' http://www.maremagnum.com/index.php?option=com_ricerca&task=risult&Ite mid=999&desiditem=52428889&frommm=1

However, a google search for Arpad Busson brings up vastly more.

With respect to Eim Group, from http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_artic le_id=391347&in_page_id=1770


Quote:
EIM is reckoned to have about £5.5 billion under management. But available accounts reveal next to nothing. The firm's figures are consolidated in Luxembourg and are not released to the public. Neither is Busson's client list — although we know EIM has had dealings with the wealthy Bin Laden Saudi Arabian clan, albeit not with Osama Bin Laden himself.


Ark (chairman Arpad Busson) is already, provably, deceitful. On ARK Schools Website 4/9/07: 'Ark schools has no religious affiliation and is committed to non-selective education.'.....Job advertising 'Inclusion Coach': Under the Burlington Danes Academy School's coat of arms: 'A Church of England School'. Evidence for this is at http://www.nineeleven.co.uk/board/viewtopic.php?t=13092. However for anyone to see the attachments they will have to be registered on this website. So Christianity with a lie. As someone has already correctly stated with respect to Ark taking control of schools: 'We did not need Ark'.

I have previously mentioned that Aecom (www.aecom.com) will be taking control of children (has a military arm and sub-contracts to the pentagon); it masquerades as 3es (www.3es.com) and received Tony Blair's full support.

In ‘The Great City Academy Fraud’, it says:


Quote:
Sir David, having no experience of education, asked one of the mushrooming educational consultancy’s to run the school. He chose 3E’s, the firm set up by the first head of the first city technology college, Valerie Bragg, and the late Stanley Goodchild, a former chief education officer for Berkshire. Tony Blair, opening the academy, made a point of crediting them: ‘Stanley Goodchild and Valerie Bragg, for their educational leadership of the academy project through their path-breaking company 3Es.' 3E’s apparently stands for ‘education, education, education’. I’ve heard that phrase somewhere before, and am wondering whether they should be paying royalties. The Prime Minister’s endorsement will have helped 3E’s win the contracts they now have for four more academies in Chelsea, Lewisham, Croydon and Liverpool; but this is hardly a surprise, since Valerie Bragg is also an advisor to the Prime Minister’s office on regeneration of schools.


What we need is transparency, and we certainly don't have that. This is, after all, about who gets their hands on our children.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
ian neal
Angel - now passed away
Angel - now passed away


Joined: 26 Jul 2005
Posts: 3140
Location: UK

PostPosted: Thu Mar 06, 2008 1:14 pm    Post subject: ARK and EIM - legal threat - thread hidden Reply with quote

Our ISP has received a complaint and threat of legal action in response to a recent thread entitled ARK and EIM. If the thread had not been removed the whole site would have been shut down until the matter could be resolved. As a result I have decide to remove it pending discussion amongst the moderators.

Thank you for your understanding
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
ian neal
Angel - now passed away
Angel - now passed away


Joined: 26 Jul 2005
Posts: 3140
Location: UK

PostPosted: Thu Mar 06, 2008 1:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

FYI email received 10 mins ago which led me to move this thread

Hi Ian,

We have received notification of possible legal proceedings against today
regarding possible defamatory postings on your forum under the thread 'The War on Children' - 'ARK and EIM'.

As we do not want to get drawn into a legal dispute on your behalf we must ask you to remove the post in question from your forums. The post linked is below:

http://www.nineeleven.co.uk/board/viewtopic.php?t=12806

We need a response to this email within 24 hours with confirmation of the
posts removal otherwise we may have to suspend the site pending successful resolution of the matter between yourself and the person making the complaint.

Kind Regards,

Simon Wallis
UH Abuse
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
TonyGosling
Editor
Editor


Joined: 25 Jul 2005
Posts: 17728
Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England

PostPosted: Thu Mar 06, 2008 3:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ian,

That is not a post, it is an entire topic.

What exactly have the lawyers told the ISP are they objecting to?

Have you got the full text of the legal letter the ISP recieved?

Is all comms between the ISP & you on this thread?

This is a bit tricky of the ISP because they should give us the text of the objection so that we can decide what to do. We can then take out any offending info and replace the rest of the thread!!

We should have all that info up here on this thread and post the legal letter on the public forum

_________________
www.lawyerscommitteefor9-11inquiry.org
www.rethink911.org
www.patriotsquestion911.com
www.actorsandartistsfor911truth.org
www.mediafor911truth.org
www.pilotsfor911truth.org
www.mp911truth.org
www.ae911truth.org
www.rl911truth.org
www.stj911.org
www.v911t.org
www.thisweek.org.uk
www.abolishwar.org.uk
www.elementary.org.uk
www.radio4all.net/index.php/contributor/2149
http://utangente.free.fr/2003/media2003.pdf
"The maintenance of secrets acts like a psychic poison which alienates the possessor from the community" Carl Jung
https://37.220.108.147/members/www.bilderberg.org/phpBB2/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
TonyGosling
Editor
Editor


Joined: 25 Jul 2005
Posts: 17728
Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England

PostPosted: Thu Mar 06, 2008 4:36 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

For everyone's information.
this is the video EIM/ARK failed to get YouTube to remove

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RiJEQwzB760

You can save it to your own computer using this link

Ian Neal is (I hope) curently in communication with the ISP to establish if there is any grounds for the legal threat.

_________________
www.lawyerscommitteefor9-11inquiry.org
www.rethink911.org
www.patriotsquestion911.com
www.actorsandartistsfor911truth.org
www.mediafor911truth.org
www.pilotsfor911truth.org
www.mp911truth.org
www.ae911truth.org
www.rl911truth.org
www.stj911.org
www.v911t.org
www.thisweek.org.uk
www.abolishwar.org.uk
www.elementary.org.uk
www.radio4all.net/index.php/contributor/2149
http://utangente.free.fr/2003/media2003.pdf
"The maintenance of secrets acts like a psychic poison which alienates the possessor from the community" Carl Jung
https://37.220.108.147/members/www.bilderberg.org/phpBB2/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
ian neal
Angel - now passed away
Angel - now passed away


Joined: 26 Jul 2005
Posts: 3140
Location: UK

PostPosted: Thu Mar 06, 2008 8:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I asked for the specifics

The letter from the solicitors to the ISP is confidential according to UH. If necessary they can pass my details on to the solicitors and ask them to contact me.

What I have posted is the full total of the communication
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
TonyGosling
Editor
Editor


Joined: 25 Jul 2005
Posts: 17728
Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England

PostPosted: Thu Mar 06, 2008 8:22 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

That's ridiculous and where Greennet would be 1000 times more helpful.

Maybe you should xplain to them that unless there is a specific allegation we'll replace the thread tomorrow.

Can't have this sort of silliness.


ian neal wrote:
The letter from the solicitors to the ISP is confidential according to UH.

_________________
www.lawyerscommitteefor9-11inquiry.org
www.rethink911.org
www.patriotsquestion911.com
www.actorsandartistsfor911truth.org
www.mediafor911truth.org
www.pilotsfor911truth.org
www.mp911truth.org
www.ae911truth.org
www.rl911truth.org
www.stj911.org
www.v911t.org
www.thisweek.org.uk
www.abolishwar.org.uk
www.elementary.org.uk
www.radio4all.net/index.php/contributor/2149
http://utangente.free.fr/2003/media2003.pdf
"The maintenance of secrets acts like a psychic poison which alienates the possessor from the community" Carl Jung
https://37.220.108.147/members/www.bilderberg.org/phpBB2/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
TonyGosling
Editor
Editor


Joined: 25 Jul 2005
Posts: 17728
Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England

PostPosted: Thu Mar 06, 2008 8:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Latest info is that the ISP FastHosts has told us to remove the entire topic or they'll close the whole site tomorrow - even though they won't give us any specific allegation of defamation.

Here's more on the man:
Arpad is the one on the left

_________________
www.lawyerscommitteefor9-11inquiry.org
www.rethink911.org
www.patriotsquestion911.com
www.actorsandartistsfor911truth.org
www.mediafor911truth.org
www.pilotsfor911truth.org
www.mp911truth.org
www.ae911truth.org
www.rl911truth.org
www.stj911.org
www.v911t.org
www.thisweek.org.uk
www.abolishwar.org.uk
www.elementary.org.uk
www.radio4all.net/index.php/contributor/2149
http://utangente.free.fr/2003/media2003.pdf
"The maintenance of secrets acts like a psychic poison which alienates the possessor from the community" Carl Jung
https://37.220.108.147/members/www.bilderberg.org/phpBB2/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
paul wright
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 26 Sep 2005
Posts: 2650
Location: Sunny Bradford, Northern Lights

PostPosted: Thu Mar 06, 2008 11:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

TonyGosling wrote:
Latest info is that the ISP FastHosts has told us to remove the entire topic or they'll close the whole site tomorrow - even though they won't give us any specific allegation of defamation.

Here's more on the man:
Arpad is the one on the left

Ouch.This the most appalling thing I've read in a long time .
Culpables in line with the Dutreux thing are threatening?

_________________
http://www.exopolitics-leeds.co.uk/introduction
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
TonyGosling
Editor
Editor


Joined: 25 Jul 2005
Posts: 17728
Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England

PostPosted: Fri Mar 07, 2008 1:51 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

From what they're saying all we have to do is change the headline and extract one post which Caz (Karen) believes is suspect o a new url and we should be in the clear.

Let's see this as a challenge to be risen to.

_________________
www.lawyerscommitteefor9-11inquiry.org
www.rethink911.org
www.patriotsquestion911.com
www.actorsandartistsfor911truth.org
www.mediafor911truth.org
www.pilotsfor911truth.org
www.mp911truth.org
www.ae911truth.org
www.rl911truth.org
www.stj911.org
www.v911t.org
www.thisweek.org.uk
www.abolishwar.org.uk
www.elementary.org.uk
www.radio4all.net/index.php/contributor/2149
http://utangente.free.fr/2003/media2003.pdf
"The maintenance of secrets acts like a psychic poison which alienates the possessor from the community" Carl Jung
https://37.220.108.147/members/www.bilderberg.org/phpBB2/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
TonyGosling
Editor
Editor


Joined: 25 Jul 2005
Posts: 17728
Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England

PostPosted: Sat Mar 08, 2008 1:14 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The discussion really needs to be with the ISP because we really don't know anything yet.



here is the legal note sent by YouTube

Quote:
This email is to inform you that YouTube has received a defamation
complaint regarding your YouTube video "ARK Schools". While YouTube is
unable to give you legal guidance in this matter, please be aware that if
legal proceedings are commenced in relation to the Video, YouTube may be
forced to produce information concerning the video, such as your email
address and IP addresses associated with your account. Remember, you are
responsible for content you post to YouTube. If you are unsure whether
your video contravenes relevant defamation laws, we recommend you contact your own counsel for guidance.

_________________
www.lawyerscommitteefor9-11inquiry.org
www.rethink911.org
www.patriotsquestion911.com
www.actorsandartistsfor911truth.org
www.mediafor911truth.org
www.pilotsfor911truth.org
www.mp911truth.org
www.ae911truth.org
www.rl911truth.org
www.stj911.org
www.v911t.org
www.thisweek.org.uk
www.abolishwar.org.uk
www.elementary.org.uk
www.radio4all.net/index.php/contributor/2149
http://utangente.free.fr/2003/media2003.pdf
"The maintenance of secrets acts like a psychic poison which alienates the possessor from the community" Carl Jung
https://37.220.108.147/members/www.bilderberg.org/phpBB2/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
TonyGosling
Editor
Editor


Joined: 25 Jul 2005
Posts: 17728
Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England

PostPosted: Fri Mar 21, 2008 12:59 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Youtube have now removed the video

nothing about why!!!

_________________
www.lawyerscommitteefor9-11inquiry.org
www.rethink911.org
www.patriotsquestion911.com
www.actorsandartistsfor911truth.org
www.mediafor911truth.org
www.pilotsfor911truth.org
www.mp911truth.org
www.ae911truth.org
www.rl911truth.org
www.stj911.org
www.v911t.org
www.thisweek.org.uk
www.abolishwar.org.uk
www.elementary.org.uk
www.radio4all.net/index.php/contributor/2149
http://utangente.free.fr/2003/media2003.pdf
"The maintenance of secrets acts like a psychic poison which alienates the possessor from the community" Carl Jung
https://37.220.108.147/members/www.bilderberg.org/phpBB2/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
TonyGosling
Editor
Editor


Joined: 25 Jul 2005
Posts: 17728
Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England

PostPosted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 3:17 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

version of video without the audio


Link

_________________
www.lawyerscommitteefor9-11inquiry.org
www.rethink911.org
www.patriotsquestion911.com
www.actorsandartistsfor911truth.org
www.mediafor911truth.org
www.pilotsfor911truth.org
www.mp911truth.org
www.ae911truth.org
www.rl911truth.org
www.stj911.org
www.v911t.org
www.thisweek.org.uk
www.abolishwar.org.uk
www.elementary.org.uk
www.radio4all.net/index.php/contributor/2149
http://utangente.free.fr/2003/media2003.pdf
"The maintenance of secrets acts like a psychic poison which alienates the possessor from the community" Carl Jung
https://37.220.108.147/members/www.bilderberg.org/phpBB2/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
Caz
Last Chance Saloon
Last Chance Saloon


Joined: 23 Apr 2006
Posts: 819

PostPosted: Mon May 19, 2008 11:13 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Video now at this location: https://secure.wikileaks.org/wiki/EIMConsult_censored_video

Talk page re video at this location: https://secure.wikileaks.org/wiki/Talk:EIMConsult_censored_video

Solicitors letter from Schillings at this location: https://secure.wikileaks.org/wiki/Schillings_legal_demands_to_EUTruth. Org_over_EIM_Chair_Arpud_Busson

What others have said about Schillings:

from: http://www.pickledbushman.com/index.php/2008/02/22/schillings_lawyers_ send_take_down_notice

Quote:
02/22/08
Schillings Lawyers send 'Take Down' notice to pickledbushman.com
03:27:14 pm, Categories: The site, Rant and Rave, YouTube, Wikileaks, 1195 words
So I woke up this morning to find a "take down" notice in my email inbox, and to be honestly surprised it did not come from Scientologists. It came from some other bottom feeders... Rich criminal defence lawyers that protect the big money of convicted criminals.

Basically these law firms are very happy to accept the blood money their clients make in exchange for their "services". In my mind evil can only happen when good men (and woman) stand by and do nothing and in the case of a law firm like Schillings Lawyers.... they not only do nothing, they for financial reward, attempt to stifle free speech and those critical of the criminals they defend.

In my case, Schillings Lawyers sent a threatening email to my hosts (The full PDF of what they sent me can be found here: http://newz.co.za/blood_money/stupid_legal_notice.pdf . I have hosted it off site so that my current host (The Planet) can not be held liable for it). However, that said, to quote the important bit:

"We understand that you host the website www.pickledbushman.com (“the
website”) and we write to you in that capacity.
We refer to a recent posting appearing on the Website entitled:
“Arsenal football club bought out with blood money” (“the Posting”). The Posting
reproduces an article originally written by Craig Murray. The Posting can be
found via the link:
http://www.pickledbushman.com/index.php/2007/09/27/arsenal_football_cl ub_bought_out_with_bl
The posting is false, indefensible and grossly defamatory of our client. Our client
views this matter extremely seriously"

A quick point to Schillings Lawyers... "labling something as "private and confidential" does not make it so. I have entered into no such contract with your insidious law firm.

The post they are referring to is one in which I wrote about how Alisher Usmanov (a convicted criminal) purchased Arsenal Football Club with blood money he earned while he allegedly built his cartel on drug money, extortion and other illegal activities.

However, this post is not about how siff the guy is (that was the purpose of my last post), but rather the bottom feeders that crow around his money at your expense. If you would like to find out more information about Alisher Usmanov please read this article by Craig Murray (former ambassador) http://www.craigmurray.org.uk/archives/2007/09/alisher_usmanov.html .

The information Schillings Lawyers wanted me to remove was a copy of Craig Murray's post I had added at the end of my writing to give people more information about this shady character.

In response to that, I have had to remove the duplication of Craig Murrays article and have it now hosted in a country that is legally safe for it (and therefore out of the jurestriction of The Planet). I have included links back on the post back to the original article in its entirety.

When I used google to research what Schillings Lawyers have being up to... Google came back with a real lot of responses, and it seems that most bloggers that have reproduced that article by Craig have also being threatened by them.

Matt Warden, a prominent political blogger had this to say

"Schillings, a London Law firm, have closed down several prominent political blogs (case study on dealing with the “internet attacker“) by contacting their webhosts, on behalf the new part owner of Arsenal - Alisher Usmanov.

Mr Usmanov’s lawyers have also sent “cease and desist” type letters to a number of other blogs that dare to mention the fact that he has been criticised, including Arsenal Fan Blogs."

http://www.mattwardman.com/blog/2007/09/21/webhost-removes-bloggerhead s-and-other-sites-after-legal-threats/

So it appears an all out attack on freedom of speech has being instigated by Alisher and law firm Schillings Lawyers.

It seems that its not only bloggers who are the victims of Schillings Lawyers. It appears that they attempted to take on one of the most important sites on the Internet today, Wikileaks.org. Wikileaks.org is a website dedicated to getting the truth out. For the leaking of important sensitive documents that almost always incriminate those in positions of power.

An article linked to wikileaks.org has this to say about Schillings:

"Have WikileakS.org successfully faced down the notorious legal firm of London based minor celebrity media spin lawyers Schillings, whose attempts to censor UK political blogs backfired so spectacularly over their rich client Alisher Usmanov''s criminal past ?

They were threatening WikiLeakS.org on behalf of the discredited Northern Rock plc, who managed to have the first run on a bank in the UK in over 140 years, and who, together with the inept handling of the crisis by the Labour government, are costing the UK taxpayer billions of pounds."

Original link

As you can see, Schillings Lawyers appears to be on the rampage in their attempts to silence people critical of their criminal clients. I just had a thought about this. From what I can see based on this information at my disposal... Schillings Lawyers clients that have being mentioned in the news and information I have seen... all appear to be very shady and illegal characters or companies that hide behind their blood money and lawyers. I wonder who the rest of Schillings Lawyers customers are, and I have to wonder if all of them are just as guilty of similar or worse crimes than the ones we know of their clients whos crimes we do know.

To me, if someone had to mention to me that they were represented by Schilling Lawyers the first few thoughts would be, "criminal, lots of blood money, dangerous". As you can see in the original legal PDF document sent to me the names of the partners at this infamous law are:

Rachel Atkins
Gideon Benaim
Rob Christie-Miller
John Kelly
Keith Schilling
Simon Smith

I am writing down those names so that history can remember them for the kind of people they are. They are the architects behind Schillings Lawyers and in my mind... are just as guilty as their clients.

There's an old saying, "No single raindrop believes it is guilty for the flood" Nowhere is this more evident than here.

Ive said what I have wanted to say about Schillings Lawyers and their siff tactics and I would suggest that everyone out there watch what this law firm and what their clients are up to, because they are the smoke that indicates that there is a fire.

On a personal note to Schillings Lawyers... should you send a take down notice to me about this post I will be shutting down my hosting account with The Planet, and I will be moving it to South African hosting which will be completely beyond your control. I will also make sure that all information about what you try do to this site and others is well documented for future generations to see.


Last edited by Caz on Tue Dec 16, 2008 8:27 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
TonyGosling
Editor
Editor


Joined: 25 Jul 2005
Posts: 17728
Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England

PostPosted: Sun Jun 08, 2008 9:45 pm    Post subject: ARK and EIM - YouTube video removed after legal threat Reply with quote

There are some worrying connections between these two organisations EIM and ARK.

All individuals involved with the new academy schools should be closely looked into.

_________________
www.lawyerscommitteefor9-11inquiry.org
www.rethink911.org
www.patriotsquestion911.com
www.actorsandartistsfor911truth.org
www.mediafor911truth.org
www.pilotsfor911truth.org
www.mp911truth.org
www.ae911truth.org
www.rl911truth.org
www.stj911.org
www.v911t.org
www.thisweek.org.uk
www.abolishwar.org.uk
www.elementary.org.uk
www.radio4all.net/index.php/contributor/2149
http://utangente.free.fr/2003/media2003.pdf
"The maintenance of secrets acts like a psychic poison which alienates the possessor from the community" Carl Jung
https://37.220.108.147/members/www.bilderberg.org/phpBB2/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
paul wright
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 26 Sep 2005
Posts: 2650
Location: Sunny Bradford, Northern Lights

PostPosted: Sun Jun 08, 2008 9:59 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Anyway, seeing as that YouTube video has been taken down, and these parties are making threats, we can assume there is something very big to hide.
Is that video still up elswhere?
EIM's Human Reengineering and Profitability Enhancement is a worrying concept particularly if it's feeding into schools and young person's institutions
It's like an arm and branch of Common Purpose

_________________
http://www.exopolitics-leeds.co.uk/introduction
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Caz
Last Chance Saloon
Last Chance Saloon


Joined: 23 Apr 2006
Posts: 819

PostPosted: Tue Jul 08, 2008 2:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Video and solicitor's letter here:

https://secure.wikileaks.org/wiki/EIMConsult_censored_video
https://secure.wikileaks.org/wiki/Schillings_legal_demands_to_EUTruth. Org_over_EIM_Chair_Arpud_Busson
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Caz
Last Chance Saloon
Last Chance Saloon


Joined: 23 Apr 2006
Posts: 819

PostPosted: Tue Jul 08, 2008 2:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Who is robbietherobot?

The following is a comment posted on youtube and the reply, while the Ark Schools video was running, prior to it being removed by youtube:

Quote:
Robbietherobot (1 week ago)

This is a classic case of internet paranoia leading to sloppy
journalism. If you had done your research properly you would have
noted that EIM (European Institute of Management) was founded in
the 80s; the EIM Group was founded in 1992 by Arpad Busson
(former partner of Elle MacPherson, currently dating Uma
Thurman). A quick cross check reveals that the two are entirely
different entities. Get your facts right!


Quote:
Cazzac111 (1 week ago)

If a company sends customers to another they are
associated. Eim Consult said people had the wrong
number, the business address in London is a PO Box, they
have a new website. Evidence of Etter is scanty. The Daily Mail,
Paul Bracchi: available accounts reveal next to nothing. The
firm’s figures are consolidated in Luxembourg…not released to
the public. Neither is Busson’s client list…we know EIM has
had dealings with the wealthy Bin Laden Saudi Arabian clan,
albeit not with Osama Bin Laden himself.


Both posted a week prior to when this document was printed, on 6/03/2008 ie. about Feb 29th.

This is not long before the website received a legal notice (on March 6th), youtube received a legal notice (on March 3rd) and Schillings letter sent (March 4th).

So, who is robbietherobot?

Is this robbietherobot?

From www.robbietherobot.com:

Quote:
Robbie the Robot dispenses invaluable advice to kids of all ages!
Unfortunately, Robbie's programming is light on ethics. Tune in every week for brand new advice from Robbie.
Caveat Lector!


Quote:
KIDS, sometimes it seems that no one is listening to anything that you say. Don't let it get you down. It doesn't mean that what you have to say isn't important. It just means that no one thinks that you are important enough to listen to. Besides, it's not what you say that's important anyway - it's how you say it, and to whom. If you can learn to speak without listening to yourself, then you could eventually become a very rich politican!

To see previous Robbie sayings, click here!

NEW! Robbie the Robot mailing list!
Want to be notified when Robbie issues a new piece of advice,
while getting a helpful heaping of Robbie's thoughts of the week at the same time?
Click here!

Contact Robbie here or email him at robbie@robbietherobot.com.
Robbie loves to get mail!

Robbie the Robot dispenses invaluable advice to kids of all ages!
Unfortunately, Robbie's programming is light on ethics. Tune in every week for brand new advice from Robbie.
Caveat Lector!

Robbie the Robot © Gary Slotnikov 2003
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Caz
Last Chance Saloon
Last Chance Saloon


Joined: 23 Apr 2006
Posts: 819

PostPosted: Thu Jul 10, 2008 9:27 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
Contact Robbie here or email him at robbie@robbietherobot.com.
Robbie loves to get mail!

Robbie the Robot dispenses invaluable advice to kids of all ages!
Unfortunately, Robbie's programming is light on ethics. Tune in every week for brand new advice from Robbie.
Caveat Lector!

Robbie the Robot © Gary Slotnikov 2003


Quote:
Web Site Evaluation Criteria
Caveat Lector: Let the Reader Beware


Oh yes. I am sure robbietherobot does indeed love to get emails from children. I wonder if he meets up with them.


Quote:
Robbie the Robot © Gary Slotnikov 2003


Is this 'gray slot-nikov'?

.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Caz
Last Chance Saloon
Last Chance Saloon


Joined: 23 Apr 2006
Posts: 819

PostPosted: Fri Aug 01, 2008 1:06 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thread which was removed on account of legal threat posted here:

http://www.911forum.org.uk/board/viewtopic.php?t=14932
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Caz
Last Chance Saloon
Last Chance Saloon


Joined: 23 Apr 2006
Posts: 819

PostPosted: Sat Dec 13, 2008 6:03 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

a possible connection to the Russian Mafiya??

http://www.truthforum.co.uk/forum/viewtopic.php?f=46&t=166
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
TonyGosling
Editor
Editor


Joined: 25 Jul 2005
Posts: 17728
Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England

PostPosted: Sun Dec 21, 2008 12:00 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Final threads to go through
_________________
www.lawyerscommitteefor9-11inquiry.org
www.rethink911.org
www.patriotsquestion911.com
www.actorsandartistsfor911truth.org
www.mediafor911truth.org
www.pilotsfor911truth.org
www.mp911truth.org
www.ae911truth.org
www.rl911truth.org
www.stj911.org
www.v911t.org
www.thisweek.org.uk
www.abolishwar.org.uk
www.elementary.org.uk
www.radio4all.net/index.php/contributor/2149
http://utangente.free.fr/2003/media2003.pdf
"The maintenance of secrets acts like a psychic poison which alienates the possessor from the community" Carl Jung
https://37.220.108.147/members/www.bilderberg.org/phpBB2/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
TonyGosling
Editor
Editor


Joined: 25 Jul 2005
Posts: 17728
Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England

PostPosted: Wed May 25, 2011 10:14 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The Injunction King, a cabal of grasping lawyers and a £2,000 an hour assault on free speech

By Richard Pendlebury - Last updated at 9:41 AM on 25th May 2011

Given how events unfolded this week, it’s hard not to conclude that Ryan Giggs has received legal advice which was the equivalent of what’s known in football as a hospital pass.

By following the guidance of his high-powered lawyers, a personal embarrassment has become a PR catastrophe. And it might well have cost him as much as £250,000 – so far – for the privilege.

Exposure of his extra-marital fling with a pneumatic brunette from kiss and tell central casting would have been at best a two-day wonder, of interest to a minority of national newspaper readers, if he had allowed the story to be published.

But by attempting to suppress it with a draconian injunction, he has turned it into an international cause celebre. To make matters worse, his name is also now synonymous with an ongoing attempt to restrict free speech in Britain. As such, it touches on every walk of life, and by so doing assumes an importance that dashes any argument that it is purely a personal matter.


Eye-watering fees: Keith Schilling, whose firm represents Ryan Giggs

Is this what Giggs hired the mighty Schillings, of Bedford Square, London, to achieve? One presumes not.

But if Giggs is a victim of his own libido and poor judgment, then he is also an unwitting casualty of the campaign by a small number of media law firms which, assisted by sympathetic judges and the Human Rights Act, have been pushing to secure a privacy law.

We will address the matter of the huge fees which this ‘crusading’ can accrue later.

For now, it is with some amusement, however, that one views the promise on the masthead of Schillings website. It boasts: ‘We protect those in the public eye from unwarranted intrusions into their personal lives.’

This robustness reflects the nature and background of the man behind what is arguably Britain’s most powerful media law firm.

Keith Schilling is a self-made protector of the rich and famous. The 54-year-old son of an unemployed father and shop worker mother, Mr Schilling left school at 15 to clerk at a Soho firm specialising in media law.

Studying at night, he went on to qualify as a solicitor and left Soho aged 28 to found his own firm.

It has made him very rich. His warning letters and writs to the media drop like confetti and he is known to revel in the nicknames ‘The Injunction King’ and ‘The Silencer’. The latter soubriquet was mentioned in a flattering newspaper profile which he then produced in court to justify his infamously eye-watering fees.

It is the silencing injunction which has become the defining weapon of Schilling and his ilk.

Why settle for a feeble ‘no comment’ from your client when they are questioned about uncomfortable truths, when there is a legal bludgeon with which you can suppress them altogether?

'As usual, Schillings have been very, very aggressive in their approach to the case'

We can trace this conflict back to the formulation of the European Convention on Human Rights in 1950. Article 8 enshrined an individual’s right to a private and family life. This was at a time when totalitarianism stalked the continent. Millions were oppressed; the rights of adulterous footballers were not in the forefront of debate.

When the convention was enshrined in British law by the Blair Government through the Human Rights Act of 1998, some could predict the dangers of its misuse.

The Bill was indeed amended to emphasise the importance of balancing privacy with the freedom of expression referred to in Article 10. Injunctions would only be granted in exceptional circumstances, theoretically.

But lo, it came to pass that the Schillings of this world jumped on it with bared fangs. Crucially, the judiciary proved receptive to their arguments.

The trickle of injunctions has recently become a flood. ‘Footballers talk to footballers,’ says one media lawyer. Former Formula One boss Max Mosley’s controversial victory in his privacy case, after the News of the World published an account of his orgy with a harem of prostitutes, encouraged the trend further.

Since the start of 2008, at least 38 injunctions have been granted by the High Court, following applications by some of the most famous names in Britain. Some are so-called superinjunctions which prevent even the existence of the injunction from being disclosed.

How does the injunction process work?

It is the silencing injunction which has become the defining weapon of Schilling and his ilk

Let’s say an adulterous public figure gets wind that details of his transgression are about to leak out, and runs to his lawyers to ask for help. The firm in question applies secretly on the client’s behalf to the High Court for an emergency ‘anonymised’ injunction to prevent publication of the story or even the subject’s name in relation to the proceedings, on the grounds that it would intrude into the privacy of his or her family.

However, such emergency injunctions only last for a week before their power expires.

There is then a return date at court, when the newspaper and other interested parties have the chance to argue their cases for publication. If the celebrity is once again successful in his or her privacy argument, the injunction is extended by the judge to the date of another court hearing.

Such litigation has to be underpinned by the understanding that the proceedings are to culminate with that third court hearing, at which the newspaper will be sued for breach of privacy. But in reality this rarely happens. It is a mere legal convention. Usually the injunctions gather dust. Only rarely are they overturned.

The lawyers’ job is done, the erring celebrity retains his wholesome, commercially friendly and now utterly misleading image and the world is none the wiser.

Keith Schilling won his reputation as a privacy expert a decade ago when he helped Naomi Campbell win a case which went to the House of Lords.

After that, he was the ‘silencer’ of choice for a legion of wealthy names.

One failure occurred last year when an injunction obtained to protect England captain John Terry from being exposed as a ‘love rat’ was overturned. Mr Justice Tugendhat ruled that it was neither ‘necessary nor proportionate’.

A view widely held in media law circles was that this decision was taken because the injunction’s clear aim was to protect Terry’s good image for commercial rather than family reasons.

Schillings took a different tack with the Giggs injunction which was exposed in the House of Commons this week, arguing that the footballer was the target of a blackmail attempt by Imogen Thomas – an unproven and contested claim which Mr Justice Eady nevertheless accepted.

But thanks to internet gossip, their efforts began to unravel – and at great material cost to the Welshman.

Keith Schilling himself is one of the most expensive solicitors in London, charging up to £650 per hour. Partners in his firm cost some £500 an hour. There would have been a team handling the Giggs case, costing perhaps in total £2,000 an hour.

In court, Giggs has been represented by Hugh Tomlinson, QC, who charges up to £20,000 per hearing. He has been supported by a junior barrister.

One legal expert calculated that because Giggs’s legal team have returned to court several times to aggressively tackle each perceived new breach, the bill could be as high as £250,000.

What could Giggs have done differently?

In hindsight, the smart choice would have been to take the red top tabloid hit on the chin and ride out what would surely have been a brief storm, save at Chez Giggs.

The smart choice would have been to take the tabloid hit, and ride out what would have been a brief storm

If an injunction was sought and gained but ran into the kind of social networking storm that occurred, it would perhaps have been most dignified, economic and tactically astute to realise the game was up, as Andrew Marr did recently.

Marr had used an injunction three years ago, to stop any reporting of the story that he had possibly fathered a child with a colleague. Last month, he spoke to the Mail about his regret at what he had done.

But that is not how firms such as Schillings operate.

Last week saw a Black Friday for the modern injunction. The one obtained by former RBS boss Sir Fred Goodwin to stop reporting of an affair he had with a female colleague while his bank imploded – costing the taxpayer £4billion – was partially overturned thanks to the very obvious public interest argument.

That same day it emerged that the indefatigable Schillings were trying to win a court order to force the Twitter website to give up names of ‘guilty’ members of the public who had mentioned Giggs’s name in reference to his injunction.

Cue the rage of the worldwide Twitterati. The dam burst: the world would not be silenced by Schillings’ threats. They had become a self-perpetuating farce.

Some have seen the injunction trend as an attempt to merge defamation and privacy into a blanket legal ban on reporting the bad behaviour of the rich and famous.

The make-up of the recent Neuberger Committee on superinjunctions – set up to investigate the need for a privacy law – did not suggest otherwise. No journalists sat on the panel. But among its members were Rod Christie-Miller, partner and chief executive at Schillings, and a partner of the other big newspaper injuncting law firm, Carter-Ruck.

‘The wave of injunctions has grown huge, and Schillings have ridden the crest,’ says one media lawyer. ‘Now perhaps it has reached its peak and will come crashing down.’

For Ryan Giggs, the damage has been done.

When he acknowledged the fans from the pitch at Old Trafford last Sunday following United’s Premier League triumph, he was not so much waving as drowning in bad, but hugely expensive legal advice.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1390626/The-Injunction-King-ca bal-grasping-lawyers-2-000-hour-assault.html

_________________
www.lawyerscommitteefor9-11inquiry.org
www.rethink911.org
www.patriotsquestion911.com
www.actorsandartistsfor911truth.org
www.mediafor911truth.org
www.pilotsfor911truth.org
www.mp911truth.org
www.ae911truth.org
www.rl911truth.org
www.stj911.org
www.v911t.org
www.thisweek.org.uk
www.abolishwar.org.uk
www.elementary.org.uk
www.radio4all.net/index.php/contributor/2149
http://utangente.free.fr/2003/media2003.pdf
"The maintenance of secrets acts like a psychic poison which alienates the possessor from the community" Carl Jung
https://37.220.108.147/members/www.bilderberg.org/phpBB2/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
Life
Validated Poster
Validated Poster


Joined: 11 Nov 2008
Posts: 554
Location: Lancashire

PostPosted: Wed May 25, 2011 12:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

That is a great report Tony, we are wiser as to what schillings is all about and now have names to present across the internet.

The following information may give insight as to what is really going on with this case, I feel they are attempting to shift the common law precedent that all future cases will follow :

Common law, also known as case law or precedent, is law developed by judges through decisions of courts and similar tribunals rather than through legislative statutes or executive branch action. A "common law system" is a legal system that gives great precedential weight to common law, on the principle that it is unfair to treat similar facts differently on different occasions. The body of precedent is called "common law" and it binds future decisions. In cases where the parties disagree on what the law is, an idealized common law court looks to past precedential decisions of relevant courts. If a similar dispute has been resolved in the past, the court is bound to follow the reasoning used in the prior decision (this principle is known as stare decisis). If, however, the court finds that the current dispute is fundamentally distinct from all previous cases (called a "matter of first impression"), judges have the authority and duty to make law by creating precedent. Thereafter, the new decision becomes precedent, and will bind future courts.

For such actions to be allowed, it has to come as a direct claim by the monarch, that the European Union is in fact part of the realm of the same, if it were not, then under the oath taken by the Judges no such laws can be enforced...


Interaction of constitutional, statutory and common law

In common law legal systems , the common law is crucial to understanding almost all important areas of law. For example, in England and Wales and in most states of the United States, the basic law of contracts, torts and property do not exist in statute, but only in common law (though there may be isolated modifications enacted by statute).

Here is what I have stated for some years now, all law has its basis in common law, the law of the land, that to ensure the statutes cannot hit your being it is essential one does not identify oneself as the commercial debt account, at any point during any and all legal claims against you.

It is after they have gained statute contract that the mentioned modifications by statute are enforceable, and the reason those who have used this information are finding very odd behaviour from the Judiciary and the Constabulary.

I can only suggest at this stage that without the statute identification of the defendant, the CPS cannot function in their means to enrich the corporate, as such they decline the case.....

still learning......

Very Happy

_________________
KEEP IT REAL
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Caz
Last Chance Saloon
Last Chance Saloon


Joined: 23 Apr 2006
Posts: 819

PostPosted: Fri May 27, 2011 3:20 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thread about the second threatening Schillings letter received by United Hostings regarding infomation on this forum, at this location:

http://www.911forum.org.uk/board/viewtopic.php?t=16397
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Caz
Last Chance Saloon
Last Chance Saloon


Joined: 23 Apr 2006
Posts: 819

PostPosted: Sat May 28, 2011 5:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Have just noticed that the Schillings latter of 4th MArch 2008 does not show up in public profile, link here: http://www.scribd.com/doc/32363018/059-Schillings-Letter-4th-March-200 8
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    9/11, 7/7 & the War on Freedom Forum Index -> Other Controversies All times are GMT
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group