FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist  Chat Chat  UsergroupsUsergroups  CalendarCalendar RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

WTC First plane impact from previously unknown angle

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    9/11, 7/7 & the War on Freedom Forum Index -> 9/11 & 7/7 Truth Controversies
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
TonyGosling
Editor
Editor


Joined: 25 Jul 2005
Posts: 17790
Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England

PostPosted: Tue Nov 18, 2008 1:05 am    Post subject: WTC First plane impact from previously unknown angle Reply with quote

25 seconds in Al Jazeera shows an interesting shot of the first plane impact from a previously unknown angle. Is the video faked?

Most peculiar


Link

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UxTB3B3XPEI

LOST unseen footage taken from Al Jazeera news (2006). It Appears to show video of First plane hitting North Tower of WTC. Until now we have been told the only video of this was taken from the Naudet 9/11 video.

_________________
www.lawyerscommitteefor9-11inquiry.org
www.rethink911.org
www.patriotsquestion911.com
www.actorsandartistsfor911truth.org
www.mediafor911truth.org
www.pilotsfor911truth.org
www.mp911truth.org
www.ae911truth.org
www.rl911truth.org
www.stj911.org
www.v911t.org
www.thisweek.org.uk
www.abolishwar.org.uk
www.elementary.org.uk
www.radio4all.net/index.php/contributor/2149
http://utangente.free.fr/2003/media2003.pdf
"The maintenance of secrets acts like a psychic poison which alienates the possessor from the community" Carl Jung
https://37.220.108.147/members/www.bilderberg.org/phpBB2/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
spiv
Validated Poster
Validated Poster


Joined: 01 Jul 2006
Posts: 483

PostPosted: Tue Nov 18, 2008 8:20 am    Post subject: IMO it's a fake.... Reply with quote

This looks faked, IMO. Note the aircraft the split second prior to hitting the tower, then that split second later the blast looks to be fully extended. There is no growth in the smoke and flames. Doesn't look real.

Either that or else someone has taken out a few frames, but why do that?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bigyin
Minor Poster
Minor Poster


Joined: 01 Mar 2007
Posts: 48
Location: Central Scotland

PostPosted: Tue Nov 18, 2008 2:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The explosion happens before the 'plane' hits the building
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
chek
Mega Poster
Mega Poster


Joined: 12 Sep 2006
Posts: 3889
Location: North Down, N. Ireland

PostPosted: Tue Nov 18, 2008 7:36 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'm not familiar enough with Al Jazeera to know if it's even a genuine promo short or not, but the WTC1 strike is certainly a fake.

Despite the lo-res example, there are blatant signs of montaging, such as the 'drop shadow' style outlining of the explosion. The location of the strike is also incorrect.

There are a hive of no-planes footage-faking tossuers out there (right, Fred?) who are notorious for screwing with legit video to create the 'anomalies' that they then "discover" - viz. the repeating smoke fake on terrorize.dk.

If I had to guess , in this case I'd go for Al Jaz not being given licence to use authentic US media footage and then 'creatively' making something 'close enough' for 2 seconds TV work.

_________________
Dissolution of the Global Corporations.
It's the only way.

It's them or us.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Mark Gobell
On Gardening Leave
On Gardening Leave


Joined: 24 Jul 2006
Posts: 4529

PostPosted: Tue Nov 18, 2008 9:49 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

chek wrote:
I'm not familiar enough with Al Jazeera to know if it's even a genuine promo short or not, but the WTC1 strike is certainly a fake.

Despite the lo-res example, there are blatant signs of montaging, such as the 'drop shadow' style outlining of the explosion. The location of the strike is also incorrect.

There are a hive of no-planes footage-faking tossuers out there (right, Fred?) who are notorious for screwing with legit video to create the 'anomalies' that they then "discover" - viz. the repeating smoke fake on terrorize.dk.

If I had to guess , in this case I'd go for Al Jaz not being given licence to use authentic US media footage and then 'creatively' making something 'close enough' for 2 seconds TV work.


If you had to guess Chek ?

_________________
The Medium is the Massage - Marshall McLuhan.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
scienceplease
Validated Poster
Validated Poster


Joined: 11 Dec 2007
Posts: 288

PostPosted: Wed Nov 19, 2008 5:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think it has been faked because the plane was flying at an angle while we are pretty sure WTC1 was hit by an aircraft that was flying almost level. It is easy to mock up this graphic and avoids copyright ownership problems.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    9/11, 7/7 & the War on Freedom Forum Index -> 9/11 & 7/7 Truth Controversies All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group