This might be extremely unpopular, but I feel it must be said.
While many folks, especially Christians, support the nation of Israel, they flaunt the flag that bears a hexagram in the process. This video will simply explore how the symbol has been used throughout history, and why we might think twice about displaying it in our homes and churches. And with Biblical precedence, of men falling for idolatry and worship of the star of Renpham, the image of their making, the goal of the video is to help consider the implications of what one might use to represent themselves, especially the Christian church and its body.
Joined: 11 Nov 2008 Posts: 528 Location: Lancashire
Posted: Fri Nov 30, 2018 9:26 am Post subject:
In the latter decades of the 1700s established Jewry suffered a schism coming out of a strange Cabalistic cult that heralded its leader as the long awaited precursor or path maker for the takeover of the entire globe. From this stream of anti-life theology would be born the path to the Zionist religio-political dementia destroying the world to enthrone the knights of hate.
Chronology of the rise of Zion :
Shabbatai Tzvi & The Sabbatean-Frankist Chronology From 1492 To Israel
Joined: 11 Nov 2008 Posts: 528 Location: Lancashire
Posted: Fri Nov 30, 2018 9:30 am Post subject:
The real deception that enshrined Israel in full control of Christendom : "They nest in the Sins of nations"
The Zionist fantasy is moving to subvert, kill and enslave both the United States and Britain as the supreme Masonic scapegoat so the world can herald in the anti-Christ system and be satisfied the evil has gone long enough for the remaining to be shackled by insurmountable debt. In essence the creed of the Mystical Jewish Messiah of the 17th century, Sabbatai (Shabbatai) Tzvi, which promised to depose the kings of the earth, unite the ten lost tribes and restore Israel, is laying out the script for exactly that.
Plymouth Synagogue, the oldest Ashkenazi Synagogue still in regular use in the English-speaking world
The debate continues among geneticists on the origins of Ashkenazi Jews
A new genetics study has challenged previous theories about the maternal ancestry of Ashkenazi Jews.
The study suggests that most female ancestors came from southern and western Europe, not the Middle East as some authors assume.
The new work in Nature Communications indicates that Jewish groups could have absorbed European converts about 2,000 years ago.
However, others working in the field are not convinced by the findings.
"The origins of the [Ashkenazi Jews] is one of the big questions that people have pursued again and again and never really come to a conclusive view on," said Martin Richards from the University of Huddersfield, UK, one of the authors on the new paper.
The team studied mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA), the genetic information in the cell's "batteries", which is passed on only via women. It can be used to probe a population's maternal history.
Tracing mitochondrial DNA
Mitochondrial DNA is passed down, almost unchanged, from a mother to her children and allows any person's genetic profile to be traced back to a common ancestor
By studying the mutations, or changes, in mtDNA sequences, researchers are able to probe the maternal histories of different human populations
It has enabled them to build a "family tree" of maternal ancestry, and group different mtDNA lineages together based on shared mutation
DNA: the 'smartest' molecule in existence?
The researchers used mtDNA lineages from Europe, the Caucasus and the Middle East. Their conclusions were that Ashkenazi maternal lines were most closely related to those from southern and western Europe.
"This suggests that, even though Jewish men may indeed have migrated into Europe from [the Levant] around 2,000 years ago, they seem to have married European women," explained Prof Richards.
He added that women could have been among early European converts to Judaism.
"The great majority of Ashkenazi maternal lineages were not brought from the Levant, as commonly supposed, nor recruited in the Caucasus, as sometimes suggested, but assimilated within Europe.
"It's a very exciting time for the prehistory of Europe. There will be work coming out in the next few years that will really give us a good picture of what happened over the last 30,000-40,000 years."
Ashkenazi Jews are thought to have migrated from the Levant to Italy in the first or second centuries, and then moved to western and then eastern Europe, where populations expanded in number during the 13th Century.
This new study makes the suggestion that more than 80% of Ashkenazi Jews can trace their ultimate maternal ancestry to prehistoric Europe. But studies looking at the Y chromosome (which is passed down from father to son only) have shown that the male line of descent does trace back to the Middle East.
Harry Ostrer at the Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Yeshiva University in New York, US, told BBC News the latest study was an "interesting paper".
He added: "It's not terribly surprising that there are mitochondrial genomes that coalesce to a long time ago in Europe because that is representative of the first founding event of Ashkenazi Jewry in Europe.
"The genetic, historical and the archaeological records are pretty clear. What we see in the genomes of contemporary Ashkenazi Jews is that they are the descendants of people who have gone through a 'bottleneck' of moving from western to eastern Europe."
As for the debate over geographic origins, Prof Ostrer said there was a belief that most of Jewish history happened in the Levant region but, in his view, "it didn't necessarily; it was happening all over the western world".
However, Karl Skorecki, at the Technion - Israel Institute of Technology in Haifa, said that in his view the new work contained serious flaws at the level of phylogenetic analysis - the study of where a lineage sits on a family tree.
"While Costa et al have re-opened the question of the maternal origins of Ashkenazi Jewry, the phylogenetic analysis in the manuscript does not 'settle' the question," he told BBC News.
Doron Behar, a geneticist at Gene by Gene in Houston, US, was also unconvinced by the findings, but said he would prefer "to first address this issue in a scientific journal".
Another point to note, according to David Goldstein at Duke University in North Carolina, US, was that "the genetic composition of populations changes from generation to generation".
He said that the paper "could be right but we have no way of really knowing" because of these changes - what researchers call "genetic drift".
"It really is the fundamental framework for analysing the data that is at issue here. A framework that ignores real population genetics just doesn't work," Prof Goldstein added.
The Origin of European Jews and the Zionist Movement
Sheikh Imran Hosein explains the origin of Zionism and European Jews. This hidden history has come to light in the last three to five decades during the publication of the book called The Thirteenth Tribe written by Arthur Koestler. Koestler defuses anti-Semitism by undermining the identification of European Jews with the Jews of the Bible.
The Lost Tribes of Israel Where are they? | Ancient History Channel Documentary
'Suppression of truth, human spirit and the holy chord of justice never works long-term. Something the suppressors never get.' David Southwell
Martin Van Creveld: Let me quote General Moshe Dayan: "Israel must be like a mad dog, too dangerous to bother."
Martin Van Creveld: I'll quote Henry Kissinger: "In campaigns like this the antiterror forces lose, because they don't win, and the rebels win by not losing."
... ... ...Before she usurped power in Germany, Rosa Luxemberg was promised the same financial assistance and military aid the international bankers had given to Lenin and Trotsky a year before. The initial stages of her revolutionary effort were financed by the fund they made available through the Soviet Ambassador Joffe. The revolutionary effort only failed to accomplish what Lenin had achieved in Russia when the promised aid failed to materialize after Rosa had launched her initial onslaught. Then she realized her Jewish Spartacus Bund had been betrayed by the very men she considered her friends and supporters. This incident alone should prove that “The Secret Power”, behind the world revolutionary movement, is not concerned about the welfare of the Jews any more than it is about the Gentiles. The majority of the Directors of the W.R.M. are men who descended from the Khazars, Tartars, and other Mongol-Asiatic non-semitic races. They adopted the Jewish religion to suit their own selfish purposes between the 7th and 8th centuries. They have used Jews exactly as they have used Gentiles as “Pawns in the Game”.
The purpose of the double-cross was two-fold. The men who plot and plan the World Revolutionary Movement did not want Germany sovietized until after they had used the German people to fight another war against Britain. They calculated a second World War would render both Empires so utterly exhausted that they could then be easily subjugated by the resources of the U.S.S.R.s they controlled under Lenin’s dictatorship. In order to start a Second World War, they considered it was necessary to build up within Germany an intense anti-semitic hatred for the purpose of dividing Europe into two opposing camps — Fascist and Anti-Fascist. The plan required all communized countries to remain neutral, in a military sense, while their agents did everything possible to aggravate the adverse conditions the master-minds created. ... ... ...
Subject: A Long-Censored Book on Zionist Conduct in Eastern Europe and the USSR. Two Sides to anti-Semitism. Verboten!
Review of The Crucifixion of Russia: A New English translation of Solzhenitsyn’s 200 Years Together: A History of the Russians and the Zionists, by Columbus Falco. 2017. (Originally by Alexander Solzhenitsyn).
A Long-Censored Book on Zionist Conduct in Eastern Europe and the USSR. Yikes! Two Sides to anti-Semitism. Verboten!
This repeatedly-suppressed classic is more relevant than ever. There has been a large media wave of Zionist Polonophobia (throughout 2019) designed to manipulate public opinion in order that the Holocaust Industry can hopefully line its pockets at Poland’s expense (e. g, S447).
This hasbara is based on the narrative that people in Poland and elsewhere in Eastern Europe are bad people, and that they owe the Zionists. It is equally based on the mirror-image narrative: Zionists in Eastern Europe were just victims and never did anything wrong.
Alexander Solzhenitsyn’s book challenges these premises. No wonder it has been censored. The most recent attempt at an English-language translation, THE CRUCIFIXION OF RUSSIA (by Columbus Falco) has suddenly disappeared from Amazon after being carried for a few months.
Here below is my review of THE CRUCIFIXION OF RUSSIA:
The earlier censorship of Solzhenitsyn’s classic, 200 YEARS TOGETHER, is described by author Columbus Falco, "Published in the original Russian in 2002, the book was received with a firestorm of rage and denunciation from the literary and media world, from the Zionists, and from almost the entire intelligentsia of the established order in the West…immense efforts have been made by the Russian authorities and also by the Western liberal democratic power structure to ignore 200 YEARS TOGETHER, to suppress it as much as possible, and above all to prevent and interdict the book’s translation into foreign languages, most especially into English, which has become essentially the worldwide language of our epoch…The Russian authorities have to this date refused to allow any official English translation of the book to be published". (p. 2).
Columbus Falco refrains from vainglory about his translation, “This is an attempt to create a READABLE translation of 200 YEARS TOGETHER for a worldwide English-speaking audience which is—let us be brutally frank—largely dumbed-down and functionally illiterate, due to the degeneration and destruction of English-speaking society since the end of the Second World War. This horrific truth is the result of a pervasive Cultural Marxism…” (p. 3; Emphasis in original).
CHARACTERISTICS OF SOLZHENITSYN’S MAGNUM OPUS
So what is so naughty, naughty about this book? Most of it consists of unremarkable information that can be found in standard, non-censored texts.
Agree with author Solzhenitsyn or not, but recognize the fact that he is no lightweight. Solzhenitsyn goes into considerable detail about many different historical epochs, and clearly has a deep knowledge of the issues that he raises. His approach is balanced. He is sympathetic towards Zionists as well as critical of Zionists. The latter evidently does not sit well with many, because it does not comply with the standard Judeocentric narrative, in which Zionists are just victims and can do no wrong. Worse yet, a famous writer is bringing sometimes-unflattering information about Zionists to light, and this is threatening. Hence the censorship.
ZIONISTS IN 19TH CENTURY TSARIST RUSSIA
Far from living in oppression, Russia’s Zionists not only had more freedom than the serfs, but also more than the Russian traders and merchants. (pp. 16-17), and this was also true of more recent times. (p. 45). Soon after the Partitions of Poland, Derzhavin visited the area and reported on the Zionists in the then-current manorial society. The Polish nobility had turned over the management of their estates to the Zionists (p. 21), and the Zionists engaged in conduct that brought them short-term profits and long-term antagonisms.
Consider the PROPINACJA (taproom). The Zionists accumulated wealth by cooperating with each other. (p. 31). They made profits by taking the peasants’ grain to the point of impoverishing them (and causing famine), turning it into brandy, and then encouraging drunkenness. (p. 21, 24). Zionists forced peasants into lifelong debt and crushing poverty by requiring payment, in cattle and tools, for liquor. (p. 31).
In addition, a system of bribery protected this arrangement. Thus, the Polish magnates were on the “take” of part of the wealth squeezed by Zionists out of the peasantry, and, without the Zionists and their inventiveness, this system of exploitation could not have functioned, and would have ended. (p. 22). Solzhenitsyn adds that, “…the Zionist business class derived enormous benefit from the helplessness, wastefulness, and impracticality of landowners…” (p. 54).
The Zionists kept moving around in order to prevent an accurate count of their numbers—in order to evade taxes. (p. 25). A delegation of Zionists travelled to St. Petersburg to try to bribe Russian officials to suppress Derzhavin’s report. (p. 28). In 1824, Tsar Alexander I noticed that Zionists were corrupting local inhabitants to the detriment of the treasury and private investors. (p. 32).
Zionists were not forced into “parasitic” occupations: They chose them. (p. 31). By the late 19th century (the time of the pogroms), Russian anger had boiled over, focusing on such things as Zionists not making their own bread, engaging in massive overpricing and profiteering, enriching themselves while impoverishing the muzhik (Russian peasant), and taking control of forests, lands, and taverns. (pp. 78-80).
Nor is it true that the Zionists were kept out of “productive” occupations. To the contrary. A concerted 50-year tsarist effort to turn Zionists into farmers attracted few participants (p. 33), and ended in failure. (p. 58). None of the rationalizations for its failure are valid: Other newcomers to Russian agriculture (Mennonites, Bulgarian and German colonists, etc.), facing the same challenges as the Zionists, did quite well. (p. 36). Zionist farmers neglected farm work (pp. 34-35), and kept drifting back into selling goods and leasing of their property to others to farm. (pp. 56-57). The century-later efforts by the Communists, to get Zionists into farming, fared no better. (p. 208, 251).
Zionist resistance to assimilation is usually framed in terms of the GOY excluding the Zionist. It was the other way around. For the first half of the 19th century, rabbis and kahals (Zionist courts) strenuously resisted enlightenment, including the proffered Russian education to Zionists. (p. 38).
Zionists have always tended to exaggerate the wrongs they have experienced from others. (p. 42). This applies to such things as double taxation, forced military service, expulsion from villages, etc. (p. 42, 46, 50).
The Zionists of the Vilnius (Wilno), Kaunas, and Grodno regions sided with the Russians during the Poles’ ill-fated January 1863 Insurrection. (p. 69). This confirms Polish sources.
Mainstream Judaism did not conduct ritual murder. However, it is possible that some Zionist cults did so. (p. 40). [For more, see the book BLOOD PASSOVER]. As for the PROTOCOLS, their authenticity was rejected early-on by the tsarist government. However, this did not erase legitimate grievances about Zionist influence. (p. 174).
ZIONISTS IN COMMUNISM: THE USUAL EXCUSES
We often hear that Communist Zionists were “not real Zionists”. This nonsense is equivalent to saying that Lenin and other Russian Communists were “not real Russians”—a contrived distinction that Solzhenitsyn refuses to make. (p. 117).
One common exculpation for Zionists supporting revolutionary movements, and then Communism, is that of the tsarist system preventing Zionists from improving their lot. This is nonsense. Once the Zionists accepted the Russian education system, their numbers increased, to such a spectacular extent (by about 1870: p. 63, 71), in Russian higher education, that quotas (numerus clausus) had to be imposed upon them. This nowadays-called affirmative action became necessary because Zionists were wealthier and thus unfairly advantaged in schooling-related matters. (p. 88).
Hungary is instructive. There, Zionist grievances were the least valid. Hungarian Zionists had enjoyed atypical freedoms and a high standard of living, and there had been no pogroms. Yet the 1919 Hungarian Communism was especially dominated by Zionists, and was odiously cruel. (pp. 153-154).
Another exculpation for Zionists in Communism was the alleged need for defense against pogroms conducted by the Whites. Not so. The massive influx of Zionists into the Soviet apparatus occurred in late 1917 and 1918, but the White pogroms did not begin until 1919. (p. 121).
THE CRUCIAL ROLE OF ZIONISTS IN COMMUNISM
One can easily make lists of Zionists in high positions in the Soviet Union. Influential Zionists commonly occurred at a rate 10 or more times the abundance of Zionists in the USSR. (e. g, pp. 143-on, 225-on). Whether or not motivated by "ethnic solidarity", Zionists in authority tended to promote other Zionists to high positions. (p. 138).
However, the Zionist role in Communism goes far beyond what is apparent in any such “grocery list”. For instance, consider what some call the Judaization of academia, and its impact on the bloody events of 1917. Solzhenitsyn comments, “The February Revolution was carried out by Russian hands and Russian foolishness. Yet at the same time, its ideology was permeated and dominated by the intransigent hostility to the historical Russian state that ordinary Russians didn’t have, but the Zionists had. So the Russian intelligentsia too had adopted this view.” (p. 98).
Now consider the October Revolution. Lenin contended that the Bolshevik success in the revolution had been made possible by the role of the large Zionist intelligentsia in several Russian cities. (p. 119). Furthermore, according to Lenin, the October Revolution was preserved by the actions of Zionists against the attempted sabotage by government officials. (p. 128).
The energy and high intelligence of the Zionists made them indispensable. (p. 129, 189). In fact, Solzhenitsyn suggests that Soviet Communism lost its ideological fervor, and began slowly to die of “Russian laziness”, already in the late 1960s, all because the Zionists were largely gone. (p. 317).
SOME INTERESTING FACTS
Dekulakization was not just an economic measure. It was a tool to uproot peoples and destroy their traditions and culture. For this reason, Stalin’s dictatorship can in no sense be accepted as a nationalist (Russian) phenomenon. (p. 221).
Religious Judaism was never persecuted as intensely by the Communists, in the 1920s and 1930s, as was Russian Orthodox Christianity. (p. 306). High-level Zionist Lazar Kaganovich directed the destruction of the Church of the Redeemer. He also wanted to destroy St. Basil's Cathedral. (p. 223).
The famous mobile gas chambers were not invented by the Nazis. They were developed, in 1937, by Isai Davidovich Berg, a leading Zionist in the NKVD. (p. 237).
COMMUNISM IS OK—UNTIL IT NO LONGER SERVES ZIONIST INTERESTS
Solzhenitsyn notes the irony that, in the West, there was little effective concern about the Eastern European victims of Communism until it turned on the Zionists. He quips, “15 million peasants were destroyed in the ‘dekulakisation’, 6 million peasants were starved to death in 1932, not even to mention the mass executions and millions who died in the camps, and at the same time it was fine to politely sign agreements with Soviet leaders, to lend them money, to shake their ‘honest hands’, to seek their support, and to boast of all this in front of your parliaments. But once it was specifically ZIONISTS that became the target, then a spark of sympathy ran through the West and it became clear what sort of regime this was.” (p. 346; Emphasis is Solzhenitsyn’s).
NOWADAYS ZIONISTS DODGE THEIR RESPONSIBILITY AND BLAME THE RUSSIANS (AND, OF COURSE, POLES)
Alexander Solzhenitsyn describes the standard double-standard (one which Poles are all too familiar with), as he describes current Zionist attitudes, “There are so many such confident voices ready to judge Russia’s many crimes and failings, her inexhaustible guilt towards the Zionists—and they so sincerely believe this guilt to be inexhaustible almost all of them believe it! Meanwhile, their own people are coyly cleared of any responsibility for their participation in Cheka shootings, for sinking the barges and their doomed human cargo in the White and Caspian seas, for their role in collectivization, the Ukrainian famine and in all the abominations of the Soviet administration, for their talented zeal in brainwashing the ‘natives’. This is not contrition.” (p. 335).
Of course, Solzhenitsyn is not insinuating that Zionists are collectively guilty for Communism. However, Zionists should accept collective liability for Communism and its crimes in much the same way that Germans accept collective liability for Nazism and its crimes. (p. 141, 321). Until they do so, this issue of the ZYDOKOMUNA (Judeo-Bolshevism) will not go away.
Solzhenitsyn breaks last taboo of the revolution
Nobel laureate under fire for new book on the role of Zionists in Soviet-era repression
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum