Joined: 13 Sep 2006
Location: One breath from Glory
|Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2012 12:38 am Post subject:
|Assuming the controlled demolition hypothesis
presuming WTC was planned to be hit by a 3rd plane then it might be safe to conclude that the intended manner of its collapse might have been similar to that of WTCs 1 and 2. It didnt turn out that way with 7 being more bottom first rather than top down.
I doubt it was planned that the plane impact would detonate any planted explosives which leaves the possibility of a remote controlled or timed detonation.
In the abscence of a plane hit on 7 then the perps would be faced with some thinking. Computer controlled detonation might have afforded the opportunity to vary the sequence of detonation e.g top down or bottom up.
The collapse time difference between WTC1 and 2; and 7 seems significant in some way to me. The arguement of plane impact weakening and knocking off fire protection couldnt be used for 7 therefore a fire duration arguement could be suggested given that normal steelwork fire protection is designed to give specific times for protection ( 0.5,1,1.50 or 2 hour if i remember correctly)
IMO the preplanned collapse of 3 WTC buildings would point towards those who would also get a financial benefit
A lot of suppositions but we gotta keep thinking in all directions. Seek truth and it will be found.
"for we wrestle not against flesh and blood but against principalities, against powers, against rulers of the darkness of this world, against wicked spirits in high places " Eph.6 v 12