public sprayed germs and chemicals

[telecasterisation]

Could you identify if they were commercial looking or military?

[GazeboflossUK]

I did have a hard look but they were just too high to tell. All I can say is they were a gray colour.....but most planes look fairly colourless at that height.

I do have some pretty good binoculars which would have helped but again, I couldn't find them quick enough.

[ishaar]

would commercial airline be allowed to fly in such close proximity to each other? I doubt it. The only time I've seen planes flying formation like that it's been military or an airshow.

[GazeboflossUK]

That's what I thought when I saw them!!

I was quite amazed, I must say. Two planes that high up - RIGHT alongside eachother.....both leaving extensive trails.

[paul wright]

Look out for the circle turning patterns recently introduced.
Some complete circular patterns were captured over Leeds recently.
Yesterday I saw a series of planes describing a quarter turn in roughly the same direction over Keighley, West Yorks (No camera on me)

[Newspeak International]

Parallel spraying pic also seen shown in vids in my sig:

[ishaar]

This from rense could be an explanation of what dictates how much particulate is sprayed and where:

If a mass of barium is vaporized in space, within seconds much of the barium becomes ionized by the suns rays, producing a highly reflective ionic cloud which deflects newly arriving solar energy back into space, thereby preventing the ground from warming to the temperature it otherwise would have attained.

Cooler-than-otherwise surface temperature means the air immediately above the ground will not heat as much as it would have, not expand and rise (evacuate upwards) as it would have, and not create the lower air pressure (relative vacuum) in that location that would have obtained otherwise. In short, laying cloud causes air pressure to be higher in regions where the sun has been prevented from reaching the ground. Oversimplifying somewhat, it means that there will be less "pull" and more "push" affecting movement of air in neighboring regions of near-surface air than otherwise; and that, of course, means control of the weather.

By using this push-pull ("high-pressure-block/low-pressure-suck") technique, the movement of neighboring parcels of air -- the parcels may be wet, dry, hot or cold, or rotating (cyclonic) -- can be redirected from the course that a super-high-speed computer pre-determined they would have taken to new courses calculated during the process. The calculations take into account (plug into the set of simultaneous equations that comprise the model) all of the variables (interacting factors) fed in real time from sensors collecting data from thousands of points in land, sea air and space. The planes laying reflective cloud change their course seveal times in the middle of a run as new computations dictate the latest requirements in the weather intervention to effect the desired result.

http://www.rense.com/general79/barium.htm

[Mark Gobell]

Under the heading "UK to seek pact on aviation pollution" the Guardian includes this picture:

[jonjo]

I emailed Greenpeace to ask them if they had examined the issue of chemtrails. This is the response I received just now.

"Dear Jon,
Thank you for this email. We’ve received a lot of emails about this issue, but I’ve yet to understand how people distinguish between a con-trail (condensation trail left by all winged aircraft under the right atmospheric conditions) and chem-trails, which appear to be identical to the naked eye. Whenever I look at a website on the issue it seems to be full of photographs of what look to me like con-trails. I did read on one that chemtrails refract light, whereas con-trails don’t. However, this is nonsense as con-trails are primarily water, and if water vapour didn’t refract light then rainbows wouldn’t exist.



Note that as reports of chemtrails started to appear, reports of UFOs tailed off.



So far I’m not convinced.



Regards,



xxxxxx xxxxxxxx

Supporter Services

Greenpeace UK"

[karlos]

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=okB-489l6MI[/youtube][/youtube]

[truthseeker john]

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=okB-489l6MI[/youtube]

Thanks for that karlos... http://truthspeakout.blogspot.com/