Who would be the worst President for the US?

spoon · Post by **spoon** » Thu Feb 21, 2008 3:19 am

Who would be the worst President for the US in regards to World and US policy?

Obama, Clinton or McCain?

Thanks

karlos · Post by **karlos** » Thu Feb 21, 2008 9:42 am

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php? ... geId=56626

Obama seems to be cut fom te same cloth as the others

festival of snickers · Thu Feb 21, 2008 9:24 pm

if obama is killed the blacks will riot

alex jones says we already know how evil hillary is so she can get away with little as president

Alulim · Post by **Alulim** » Thu Feb 21, 2008 10:41 pm

Three CFR appointed puppets.

Wokeman · Post by **Wokeman** » Thu Feb 21, 2008 11:00 pm

Without any shred of a doubt, the worst president of all time (although perhaps in his case I should refer to him as the Resident of the White House) is Bush Jnr. He may even be the worst ROTW including those candidates as yet unborn. But, I promise you, he's up there!

QuitTheirClogs · Post by **QuitTheirClogs** » Thu Feb 21, 2008 11:08 pm

My guess for the probability of global nuclear armageddon during the next presidency is as follows:

McCain: 2-1 (hence "the worst")
Clinton: 5-1
Obama: 20-1

If Obama becomes president the foreign policy agenda will be set by Zbigniew Brzezinski – he’s already negotiating with Syria:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/02/1 ... 86186.html

Yes I know, ZB is an evil b*st*rd, but he’s not a psychotic evil b*st*rd, and I think he’d be able to drag Israel to the negotiating table.

paul wright · Post by **paul wright** » Fri Feb 22, 2008 12:01 am

Zbigniew holds control? A return of the Carter days. The Trilateral agenda He's grandmaster of the Grand Chessboard isnt he.
Obama holds a semblance of decency, gets elected, and gets assassinated.
The blacks riot universally,martial law is declared, the FEMA camps start receiving occupants.
That's the sole reason I can see for the possible move out of the long term Bush/Clinton sway towards a black candidate. To move the agenda to the next phase in a hurry

Dallas · Post by **Dallas** » Fri Feb 22, 2008 12:29 am

QuitTheirClogs wrote:My guess for the probability of global nuclear armageddon during the next presidency is as follows:

McCain: 2-1 (hence "the worst")
Clinton: 5-1
Obama: 20-1

If Obama becomes president the foreign policy agenda will be set by Zbigniew Brzezinski – he’s already negotiating with Syria:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/02/1 ... 86186.html

Yes I know, ZB is an evil b*st*rd, but he’s not a psychotic evil b*st*rd, and I think he’d be able to drag Israel to the negotiating table.

Terrible state of affairs we're dealing with when Zbigniew Brzezinski is an improvement, but I have to agree.

Dallas · Post by **Dallas** » Fri Feb 22, 2008 12:31 am

paul wright wrote:Zbigniew holds control? A return of the Carter days. The Trilateral agenda He's grandmaster of the Grand Chessboard isnt he.
Obama holds a semblance of decency, gets elected, and gets assassinated.
The blacks riot universally,martial law is declared, the FEMA camps start receiving occupants.
That's the sole reason I can see for the possible move out of the long term Bush/Clinton sway towards a black candidate. To move the agenda to the next phase in a hurry

You may have a point. Being black, I'd like to think at least *some* black folks would see through such a setup, but your scenario is pretty plausible, and would probably still follow the same basic outline even if only *half* the blacks in the country riot.

spoon · Post by **spoon** » Fri Feb 22, 2008 12:39 am

Please can you tell me what the purpose would be for assasinating Obama?

I dont understand much of this but I also thought this could happen but from Hillary Clinton's side as she is the Devil wearing Prada!

Thanks

Dallas · Post by **Dallas** » Fri Feb 22, 2008 12:46 am

spoon wrote:Please can you tell me what the purpose would be for assasinating Obama?

I dont understand much of this but I also thought this could happen but from Hillary Clinton's side as she is the Devil wearing Prada!

Thanks

Assassinating the first black POTUS would be sure to spark widespread rioting in black communities. Which, if it is in fact true that the PTB would like to start putting Americans in the FEMA-run prison camps soon and institute full-on martial law, is a rather good idea on their part. Not entirely implausible, IMHO.

spoon · Post by **spoon** » Fri Feb 22, 2008 12:50 am

Thanks for the reply Dallas but I still dont understand what the benefit is for doing this? Why do they want to put people in FEMA camps, weres it all heading if they did this?

Many thanks

P.S Whats does PTB stand for?

Dallas · Post by **Dallas** » Fri Feb 22, 2008 12:58 am

spoon wrote:Thanks for the reply Dallas but I still dont understand what the benefit is for doing this? Why do they want to put people in FEMA camps, weres it all heading if they did this?

Many thanks

P.S Whats does PTB stand for?

PTB = Powers That Be - I use it mainly in reference to the CFR/Trilateral crowd.

The goal is a return to mercantilism. We're all to be serfs that have no rights, only privileges... and work ourselves to the bone for a pittance to benefit a small clique of oligarchs.

This link may give you some insight as to where I am coming from: http://www.unicor.gov/

paul wright · Post by **paul wright** » Fri Feb 22, 2008 1:08 am

Brezinzki must be about 90 but much like Kissinger looks pretty much the same as he has done for the past few decades.
They want to put people in FEMA camps because that's what they're there for and want eventually to fill them up
While things seem to be in Obama's favour I cant think for a moment why he would be an American Union puppet. It's a possibility but unlikely
On the'diversity' thing maybe but that's a falsehood and not likely to be the real outcome
As far as I can see the African race has been particularly selected for genocide
An afroamerican could only be selected for death, as a trigger for martial law, further attacks on countries, world government takeover and all the rest

karlos · Post by **karlos** » Fri Feb 22, 2008 3:38 am

an Obama assasination is a strong possibilty.
Dont forget many people were assasinated (sorry committed suicides and left notes) during the Bill Clinton years.
It would be very likely if Obama chooses Hilary as his Vice President.

Stick with Edwards - Barry
At least you wont get killed!

McCain is also an actor.
There is no way a guy like him can be president, he has so many skeletons and physical disadvantages that he is simply there to make up the numbers.
Obama and Hilary for different reasons are the NWO candidates.
All 3 have promised by making election pledges that they will engage in more hostile wars. Defence stocks have been bucking the trend and rising lately.

Dont forget all 3 have court cases and scandals upcoming.
Obama - sex and crack cocaine
Hilary - embezelment and illegal fundraising
McCain - too many to list including going over the side

The possibilty of scandals could still result in Bush declaring Martial Law.
EG: Vote rigging causes mass rioting in November leading to a clampdown?

[youtube]http://youtube.com/watch?v=0eHyyOgb_eA&feature=related[/youtube]

[youtube]http://youtube.com/watch?v=s8Q81vs3Z30&feature=related[/youtube]

[youtube]http://youtube.com/watch?v=lZsUb6CJijE[/youtube]

Emmanuel · Post by **Emmanuel** » Sat Feb 23, 2008 10:28 am

Reflecter · Post by **Reflecter** » Sat Feb 23, 2008 2:26 pm

Obama vs Clinton VS Sanity
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OBQlx7XMaIk&NR=1[/youtube]

Ryan Dawson of Anti-neocons.com gives his insightful opinion