Jay Ref Posting Log

[The Watcher]

Just thought I'd wait until Jay Ref clocked off for the day before posting his/her track record, since joining this forum on July 20th.

Joined Forum: 20th July 2006

Total Posts as at 9.20pm Weds 9th August 2006 = 223

Average posts per 'working day' = 14

Date: ----1st Post----Last Post
9/8--------2.18pm-----8.57pm
8/8--------2.22pm-----9.12pm
7/8--------2.27pm-----9.03pm
Sun 6/8--------------------------
Sat 5/8---6.58pm-----7.50pm - (1hrs Overtime?)
4/8--------3.45pm-----8.41pm
3/8--------3.10pm-----6.32pm
2/8--------2.22pm-----8.59pm
1/8--------1.56pm-----9.13pm
31/7-------2.33pm-----9.16pm
Sun 30/7------------------------
Sat 29/7------------------------
28/7-------2.33pm-----9.03pm
27/7-------3.05pm-----9.07pm
26/7-------5.20pm-----9.45pm
25/7-------4.28pm-----7.09pm
24/7-------2.05pm-----10.54pm
Sun 23/7-------------------------
Sat 22/7------------------------
21/7-------3.02pm-----10.17pm
20/7-------4.05pm------8.55pm

In addition to the above, Jay Ref has posted on just two occasions outside of his/her ‘Office Hours’:
1) 1.25am on 28/7
2) 4.36am on 24/7

A few pertinent observations:
1). Jay Ref's current assignment probably began on Monday 18th July; thereby allowing a couple of days to browse the forum before taking on the mantle of Forum Skeptic (or Sceptic as you say in England)

2). Jay Ref doesn't work weekends, although he/she may have booked 1hrs overtime on Saturday 5th Aug.

3). Jay Ref starts work at 2pm (UK time) and finishes work at 9pm (UK time).

I think it is safe to assume that Jay Ref probably works in either Washington D.C. or in Quantico, Virginia. Both locations are in the Eastern US Time Zone. So Jay Ref probably starts work at 8.00am (EST), has a coffee and a de-brief with his/her supervisor regarding the previous days activity on www.nineeleven.co.uk , along with any other parallel assignments. Posting commences at 9.00am. through 4.00pm; probably allowing an hour before clocking off to write up the required reports.

Jay Ref is probably a College Graduate, recruited through the following program:
www.espionageinfo.com/In-Int/Intelligen ... reers.html

I could continue with the profiling of Jay Ref but I think you probably get the picture.

I can already predict Jay Ref's attempt to deny these observations ... but the bottom line is that you should all be greatly encouraged that the pathetic minions of the genocidal Bush/Cheney administration feel it necessary to devote resources to engaging on this forum.

In reality, if the guys (& gals) performing these BS assignments knew the real truth ...they'd need a change of underwear.

If this summary helps you to decide whether or not to invest your time engaging these pompous pr*cks, I'm glad to have been of service.

The Watcher

[Johnny Pixels]

Oooh Do me, profile me. I wanna see what I get, and I'll tell you how close you are!

[paul wright]

Oooh Do me, profile me. I wanna see what I get, and I'll tell you how close you are!

You are not worth anybody's time or energy
You are really only one of JR's little mind controlled rent boys
I hope that I and many others here can stop wasting our time with you

[The Watcher]

Johnny Pixels wrote:

Oooh Do me, profile me. I wanna see what I get, and I'll tell you how close you are!

Sorry Johnny, you're not in Jay Ref's class...although you do appear to improving in the role of minor irritant, your employer is not really getting their money's worth.

You would need to double your pathetic output before you are worth the investment of producing a profile ... but we know the game...probably a lot better than you would ever believe!

The Watcher

[Johnny Pixels]

Is that because I post any time of the day or night and generally ruin any kind of pattern of posting during office hours?

Come on, do me!

[paul wright]

F*ck off, JP
That's my best advice to you
You are exposed

[Andrew Johnson]

Dear Watcher,

Well, you seem to have read my mind. Due to the troll attacks on our forum I was wondering if such an analysis might yield useful data. Thanks for doing the forum a service.

Your analysis ties in quite nicely with my light-hearted but perhaps fairly accurate post here:

http://www.nineeleven.co.uk/board/viewt ... 6055#16055

Thanks again for your positive contribution, sir (or madam!)

[Andrew Johnson]

JP,

Is that because I post any time of the day or night and generally ruin any kind of pattern of posting during office hours?

Come on, do me!

Nice to know your are disclosing your intent openly now... that you would rather us profile you than talk about the horrendous crime of 9/11.

[Johnny Pixels]

F*ck off, JP
That's my best advice to you
You are exposed

Then profile me.

[paul wright]

F*ck off, JP
That's my best advice to you
You are exposed

Then profile me.

Why on earth would I waste my time?
I'm not about to embrace your knob as a centre of attention
Which is all you are seeking

[The Watcher]

Johnny Pixels wrote:

Then profile me.

One common denominator amongst those generally employed to perform low grade intelligence tasks, is an ego the size of a planet.

Call it a hunch ...but I'd say that JP fits the bill to a 'T'!

It's about 45mins before you clock off for the day, so you can go share a beer with your crass Phi Beta Kapa buddies and tell them how f*cking amazing you are.

The Watcher ... is watching you JP

[Johnny Pixels]

Johnny Pixels wrote:

Then profile me.

One common denominator amongst those generally employed to perform low grade intelligence tasks, is an ego the size of a planet.

Call it a hunch ...but I'd say that JP fits the bill to a 'T'!

It's about 45mins before you clock off for the day, so you can go share a beer with your crass Phi Beta Kapa buddies and tell them how f*cking amazing you are.

The Watcher ... is watching you JP

YAY! Wrong!

It's 12:44 here in Blighty.

[Andrew Johnson]

JP,

You might be telling the truth, or you might be posting through a VPN connection. We have looked at your IP address by the way... interesting...

In anycase, it's trivial to route through a VPN connection to make it appear you are in the UK. Even I know that!

[IronSnot]

I think it is safe to assume that Jay Ref probably works in either Washington D.C. or in Quantico, Virginia.

Actually I wonder what job he does have. You're right about the above though, I think. Not much else though.

You're not really living up to your nic.

[Veronica]

It's 12:44 here in Blighty.

No it isn't ... it's 12:58.

"Blighty" ... what a give-away!!!!!

[Johnny Pixels]

JP,

You might be telling the truth, or you might be posting through a VPN connection. We have looked at your IP address by the way... interesting...

In anycase, it's trivial to route through a VPN connection to make it appear you are in the UK. Even I know that!

Yeah that's true, we route all our traffic through Blueyonder because they've got a contract with the security services to provide internet access for their buildings. It's broadband so they don't mind us because we don't use too much bandwidth, as we're only running internet explorer and posting on forums. They've got a bit arsy sometimes when we start running MSN so me and the others can coordinate attacks on forums, but we often use webcams so we can talk and type, and that eats up a little more bandwidth than they'd like. We just tell them to f'off because we're here doing important work and they're just back in the office looking at porn. They tell us they're looking for illegal sites, but it's just an excuse to look at tits if you ask me.

[IronSnot]

"Blighty" ... what a give-away!!!!!

Do you think so Veronica from Hanworth!

I always thought !!!!!!!!!!! was a dead giveaway. But because you use them I guess I must be wrong.

[DeFecToR]

In 1986, James Randi, one of the most prominent members of CSICOP, received a five year grant of $272,000 from the MacArthur Foundation to assist with his hoaxes and attacks on all matters spiritual, psychic and holistically medical.-

On both sides of the Atlantic, CSICOP carried out a sustained campaign against alternative medicine. There are close ties with the National Council Against Health Fraud with continual debunking and ridiculing of any therapies which do not meet its approval, specifically to do with cancer and AIDS. It is notable that approval is inevitably given to treatments deriving from the products of multinational drug companies: Welcome, Hoffman, LaRoche, Eli Lily, etc., all of whom are not only linked to the US foundations through hospitals and research institutes, but also the government in the guise of the FDA (Federal Drug Administration), who approve the use of new drugs for sale, so implying their safety.

CSICOP tactics

1) Demand scientific methodology is used and then ridicule any results presented as 'biased' or 'pseudoscientific'.
2) Belittle any scientist or academic appearing to move away from orthodoxy.
3) Demand peer review of any paper presented for publication (by definition, this is very hard to achieve in totally new areas of research).
4) Do not offer assistance of any kind.
5) Heavily and widely publicise that 'hoaxing' and 'fraud' are the only explanations for what is reported.
6) Do not engage in discussion. The organisation's associates should be called upon to provide the 'expert' viewpoint. The use of academic titles such as Doctor, Professor and Nobel Prize Winner adds 'credibility'.
7) Adopt a caring and protective attitude as the guardians of 'ordinary' people who could be 'duped' by unscrupulous 'tricksters' trying to make money out of them.
Encourage individuals who are seen to be sowing seeds of mistrust and confusion in target groups.
9) Counter any attacks against the organisation as soon as practicable.

As these links between Schnabel and religious and intelligence groups do appear to exist, that links also exist between the Vatican, the Trilateral Commission, CSICOP, CIA, MI5 AND MI6 is well known.

Organisations associated with Randi have a long history of grooming young men to act as disruptors amongst groups who promote stuff that is antithetical and seen as a threat to the Established order

http://www.greatdreams.com/faking.htm

Just to keep this fresh in everyones mind.

Then profile me.

Why? I seriously doubt you are suspect. You appear to be one of the morons who have been to the debunk sites and have come away with your mind and opinions structured for you.

You are a waste of time.

Jay Ref i admire. He is intelligent. You i pity.

[Johnny Pixels]

It's about 45mins before you clock off for the day, so you can go share a beer with your crass Phi Beta Kapa buddies and tell them how f*cking amazing you are.

The Watcher ... is watching you JP

I'm working late tonight, I just had to phone the guys to tell them I'll ahve to pass on the beer. The truth movement is getting hardcore serious now, so I've got my work cut out arguing with them over minor points just to keep them busy so they don't find out the truth.

[chipmunk stew]

Just thought I'd wait until Jay Ref clocked off for the day before posting his/her track record, since joining this forum on July 20th.

Joined Forum: 20th July 2006

Total Posts as at 9.20pm Weds 9th August 2006 = 223

Average posts per 'working day' = 14

Date: ----1st Post----Last Post
9/8--------2.18pm-----8.57pm
8/8--------2.22pm-----9.12pm
7/8--------2.27pm-----9.03pm
Sun 6/8--------------------------
Sat 5/8---6.58pm-----7.50pm - (1hrs Overtime?)
4/8--------3.45pm-----8.41pm
3/8--------3.10pm-----6.32pm
2/8--------2.22pm-----8.59pm
1/8--------1.56pm-----9.13pm
31/7-------2.33pm-----9.16pm
Sun 30/7------------------------
Sat 29/7------------------------
28/7-------2.33pm-----9.03pm
27/7-------3.05pm-----9.07pm
26/7-------5.20pm-----9.45pm
25/7-------4.28pm-----7.09pm
24/7-------2.05pm-----10.54pm
Sun 23/7-------------------------
Sat 22/7------------------------
21/7-------3.02pm-----10.17pm
20/7-------4.05pm------8.55pm

In addition to the above, Jay Ref has posted on just two occasions outside of his/her ‘Office Hours’:
1) 1.25am on 28/7
2) 4.36am on 24/7

A few pertinent observations:
1). Jay Ref's current assignment probably began on Monday 18th July; thereby allowing a couple of days to browse the forum before taking on the mantle of Forum Skeptic (or Sceptic as you say in England)

2). Jay Ref doesn't work weekends, although he/she may have booked 1hrs overtime on Saturday 5th Aug.

3). Jay Ref starts work at 2pm (UK time) and finishes work at 9pm (UK time).

I think it is safe to assume that Jay Ref probably works in either Washington D.C. or in Quantico, Virginia. Both locations are in the Eastern US Time Zone. So Jay Ref probably starts work at 8.00am (EST), has a coffee and a de-brief with his/her supervisor regarding the previous days activity on www.nineeleven.co.uk , along with any other parallel assignments. Posting commences at 9.00am. through 4.00pm; probably allowing an hour before clocking off to write up the required reports.

Jay Ref is probably a College Graduate, recruited through the following program:
www.espionageinfo.com/In-Int/Intelligen ... reers.html

I could continue with the profiling of Jay Ref but I think you probably get the picture.

I can already predict Jay Ref's attempt to deny these observations ... but the bottom line is that you should all be greatly encouraged that the pathetic minions of the genocidal Bush/Cheney administration feel it necessary to devote resources to engaging on this forum.

In reality, if the guys (& gals) performing these BS assignments knew the real truth ...they'd need a change of underwear.

If this summary helps you to decide whether or not to invest your time engaging these pompous pr*cks, I'm glad to have been of service.

The Watcher

.......

BWAHHHAAAHAHAHAHAAH!!!!!!!

Thanks, that's the funniest bit of paranoia I've read in quite some time.

Just remember, Watcher: WE'RE WATCHING YOU!!! boogaboogabooga!!!

[DeFecToR]

Thanks, that's the funniest bit of paranoia I've read in quite some time.

Either way, it is handy for someone that he is following instructions to the letter;

1) Demand scientific methodology is used and then ridicule any results presented as 'biased' or 'pseudoscientific'.
2) Belittle any scientist or academic appearing to move away from orthodoxy.
3) Demand peer review of any paper presented for publication (by definition, this is very hard to achieve in totally new areas of research).
4) Do not offer assistance of any kind.
5) Heavily and widely publicise that 'hoaxing' and 'fraud' are the only explanations for what is reported.
6) Do not engage in discussion. The organisation's associates should be called upon to provide the 'expert' viewpoint. The use of academic titles such as Doctor, Professor and Nobel Prize Winner adds 'credibility'.
7) Adopt a caring and protective attitude as the guardians of 'ordinary' people who could be 'duped' by unscrupulous 'tricksters' trying to make money out of them.
8)Encourage individuals who are seen to be sowing seeds of mistrust and confusion in target groups.
9) Counter any attacks against the organisation as soon as practicable.


He's doing a fantastic job so far!

BTW CM, do you fancy commenting on the Israeli dancers? I'm not trying to bait you in to an arguement, i genuinely wish to know how you would explain these anomalies whilst still remaining within the borders of the official story.

[Gravy]

Do me next! Do me next!

[IronSnot]

Do me next! Do me next!

[esoteric]

Ha!

Jay Ref = OWNED!

Hat off to anybody willing to add to the argument of 9/11, no matter which version of the truth you stand behind. Just to talk about it and share ideas is doing good.

Keep up the good work you are doing on this forum, the truth will set us all free....eventually.

As a side note, some people in this thread are really good at mouthing off whilst sitting behind the safety of their monitor. I think they must have been bullied at school.

[DeFecToR]

I think they must have been bullied at school.

Yeh. Most likely by someone with very slightly darker tanned skin than their own. After all, their fear of arabs needs to have originated somewhere. It sure as hell coundnt have been the 911 commission report.

[Andrew Johnson]

Yeah that's true, we route all our traffic through Blueyonder because they've got a contract with the security services to provide internet access for their buildings.

Ah. thanks for the information. So what, if any, is your connection to these "security services" (whose job, by the way will be made more and difficult due to a series of illegal wars and invasions based on lies)

Not all your IP addresses were listed as Blue Yonder, by the way.

Gravy - nice that you jumped in and wanted to be "profiled"! Nice when "self-sorting" takes place - saves us work!

What's this then "honesty day" for you people?

[Andrew Johnson]

BWAHHHAAAHAHAHAHAAH!!!!!!!

Thanks, that's the funniest bit of paranoia I've read in quite some time.

Just remember, Watcher: WE'RE WATCHING YOU!!! boogaboogabooga!!!

Well chippy - looks like hard data to me - evidence is another name. But you wouldn't be interested in that now would you? After all, you are paid not to be, have had your soul and conscience suppressed and, unless you are prepared to reveal your identity, I personally will believe you work for an organisation that is trying to stop the truth coming out. Which is the opposite of what you pretend to be.

[IronSnot]

I'll profile you Gravy. (although I'm not sure that's what you asked for)

Self loathing Canadian, young, sexually repressed, Tory lover, fantasy games developer.

How's that?

[Uma]

BWAHHHAAAHAHAHAHAAH!!!!!!!

Thanks, that's the funniest bit of paranoia I've read in quite some time.

Just remember, Watcher: WE'RE WATCHING YOU!!! boogaboogabooga!!!

Well chippy - looks like hard data to me - evidence is another name. But you wouldn't be interested in that now would you? After all, you are paid not to be, have had your soul and conscience suppressed and, unless you are prepared to reveal your identity, I personally will believe you work for an organisation that is trying to stop the truth coming out. Which is the opposite of what you pretend to be.

And of course, (in his capacity as moderator) Andrew will at the very least be able to put a location on your IP address

[chipmunk stew]

BWAHHHAAAHAHAHAHAAH!!!!!!!

Thanks, that's the funniest bit of paranoia I've read in quite some time.

Just remember, Watcher: WE'RE WATCHING YOU!!! boogaboogabooga!!!

Well chippy - looks like hard data to me - evidence is another name. But you wouldn't be interested in that now would you?

Evidence of what? That he posts mainly during the work day? Maybe he has a boring job. If you were resourceful rather than merely paranoid, you might discover some facts about Jay Ref, such as he's 46 years old and works as a network engineer.

After all, you are paid not to be, have had your soul and conscience suppressed and, unless you are prepared to reveal your identity, I personally will believe you work for an organisation that is trying to stop the truth coming out. Which is the opposite of what you pretend to be.

And that's what brands you as a paranoid moonbat. Why can't you fathom that there are those of us who find the attitude and message of you Inside Jobbers so intellectually cowardly, morally repugnant and personally offensive that we would take time out of our lives to confront you about it?

And again, if you were resourceful, rather than merely paranoid, you'd be able to find out a great deal about me.