In the beginning it was Jim Fetzer's idea to start it up (last year).
Steven Earl Jones was invited to be the Co-Chair, and accepted. Jones then dragged in one Alex Floum, to set the whole thing up … including the WebSite & the Scholar's Forum.
Alex Floum is a professional Attorney, who deals in 'Intellectual Property' matters.
Scholars for 9/11 Truth was all, therefore, set up in Floum's name … not Fetzer's.
Alex Floum was 'outed' as blogger "GeorgeWashington", on 911Blogger.com, some weeks ago. He was also 'outed' as Jones' Attorney.
Floum has not denied this … however they do remain allegations … and, therefore, not necessarily the Truth.
However, after many repeated attempts at obtaining denials, none have been forthcoming.
"GeorgeWashington" is a Moderator at 911Blogger.com, and has been instrumental in censoring (by removing) anything and everything that does not support Jones' absurd 'thermate' nonsense. He has also been seen to post lie after lie (see my first post in this Forum).
Recently, Jim Fetzer, has seen the commonsense in Morgan Reynolds' and Judy Wood's presentations of how the Twin Towers were destroyed, and this set him on an 'anti-Jones' path.
Fetzer wrote a highly-critical (of Jones) Open Letter on the Scholars Website.
Floum has now pulled down this letter, and changed the WebSite Password … thus depriving Fetzer of what really is 'his own property'.
Floum can do this because all the registrations were originally made through him, and therefore he holds the 'keys'.
Fetzer has tried to come to terms with all of this by incorporating Scholars for 9/11 Truth as a non-profit organisation, to be run along democratic lines.
This is not good enough for Floum/Jones, so they are attempting to start up their own "Scholars for 9/11 Truth & Justice" and … having also 'stolen' the Membership List (which, for some reason my name was still on) … have e-mailed everyone attempting to cajole them into moving with Floum/Jones.
They have not been entirely successful. (From memory) I recall that only about 37% of the Membership followed suit. The vast majority just stood back in amazement at all the obvious finagling that has been going on.
Quite what will happen is still very much up in the air, however Floum is being hit from all sides. Here is a copy of a recent (highly sarcastic) e-mail I sent to Rick Siegel (copied to many others, including Floum). Its subject matter was in response to this article by Rick, his radio broadcast & the Heavy WaterGate Video (remember Alex Floum = "GeorgeWashington" in all probability):
(You will have to guess the words behind the asterisks). Funnily enough, I've not yet had any reply.Veronica wrote:Hi Rick,
I just have to congratulate you on your invaluable article identifying Alex Floum's activities in respect of 9/11 Research. It's one of those 'cannot put downs'. My personal preference was for Chapter 4, which details his 2004 legal achievements. (Although I did get slightly lost in some of the 'legalese', I must admit)
With an Attorney of such power on our side we have absolutely nothing to fear, IMHO.
More power to your elbow, Rick! More power to Floum's elbow! (Let's just hope he doesn't run out of Indictments ... 'cos that would be a crying shame).
I wonder if Alex Floum would consider turning his attention towards that craven liar on 911Blogger.com ... the one who goes under the acronym "GeorgeWashington". Any chance of using your Power of Attorney to reign in THAT despicable piece of lying * .... and put some Truth into his filthy mouth for once in his life? What do you think Alex? Any chance?
I can give you a good example of his lying *, Alex. He said that the Scholars had "debated" 'No-planes' and found no Truth in it. That's what he said, Alex. It's there in his blog. Yet I have a copy of those 'Scholars Threads'. Should I publish them to show that no such 'debate' took place? So that the world can see what a lying * "GeorgeWashington" is? Would you like a copy, as evidence, Alex?
Best,
Veronica
There is an excerpt from Rick's Radio broadcast here, where he describes what happened when he met Prof. Steven Earl Jones.
If you watch the Heavy WaterGate Video (via the link above), you will see how Jones, in 1989, ALMOST killed the fine work of Pons & Fleischmann … but not quite (fortunately, I would think, for humanity in general).
Jones was obviously sent in as 'damage limitation', in an attempt to divert "9/11 Truth" into a 'thermate' cul-de-sac.
He will only succeed if you let him.
Listen to Rick Siegel, especially when he tells you to 'make up your own mind' … and don't be led by anyone … and that includes both myself and Rick … and (of course) Jones & Floum.
Make up your own independent minds.
But only utilise the Truth in doing so.