Right, this thread is a dumping ground for any pointless "Ooo's a shill" calling posts I find around the forum. Its not a serious topic and doesnt merit any serious replies, but any further "Ooo's a shill" comments on threads run the distinct risk of being split off and joined to it: thats not a promise as I don't have infinite time to play silly buggers, but it should become obviously clear which posters indulge in fruitless shill calling, so if that applies to you and you dont want to pawn yourself, pack in the "shilliness" and find something more productive to do
John White
A reminder that shilliness gets merged here when I run across it
He thinks he's been clever and a hard man generating immature, big bully posts. The guy is an emotional cripple. Get off the thread, Ironsnot, you are embarassing yourself.
IronSnot wrote:And 'Ally' critiquing me for bullying.
Well that's ironic.
I am not Ally. I have been observing your posts for a long time and your scabby arse should have been moderated and slammed into the CC dustbin some time ago. Like I said, re read those sickening bully boy posts of yours and weep.
This place has been infiltrated to the hilt and the moderators need to scan those IP adresses carefully and act accordingly.
Rosalee really gets your goat doesn't she, bully boy?
I wonder why?
Hi Ally still polite as ever!
If people can get away with sh*tting on evidence based threads why have people got problems with Ironsnot's comments? Is that what is known as double standards?
thought criminal wrote:I am not Ally........This place has been infiltrated to the hilt and the moderators need to scan those IP adresses carefully and act accordingly.
You're paranoid, abusive and happy to censor posts from posters you don't like.
Rosalee really gets your goat doesn't she, bully boy?
I wonder why?
Hi Ally still polite as ever!
If people can get away with sh*tting on evidence based threads why have people got problems with Ironsnot's comments? Is that what is known as double standards?
I will state again, I am not Ally. I want to make that clear because I dont want him to be taking the whip for what I say. I am watching you all carefully. Your remarks about the Web Fairy are disgustingly dumb and ultimately VAPID. You are like a pack of wolves turning on anything that confuses you and threatens you. Your responses to this thread that Web Fairy started up are truly vomit inducing. You are just a bunch of chauvinist men playing the SPASTIC DETECTIVES.
Last edited by thought criminal on Fri Jan 12, 2007 2:27 pm, edited 1 time in total.
The thing is that the No Planes theory is gathering momentum and rendering you anti NPT people the cavemen of the movement. "It's disinfo, it's disinfo!", the cavemen bark, slur and splutter, like a stuck mono record and just as hapless as the dumb bunnies who 'fink 19 islamists dunnit'. You must all evolve and to do this you must realise that maybe, ever so probably, that the 'NPT disinfo line of inquiry' was cobbled together by the very people who dont want you going anywhere near the truth.
You are all being blinded by egos running wild and chronic 9/11 dementia.
scar wrote:Is that your rebuttal to salter?
I dont give a damn about leaders as i am not a sheep. I make my own mind up thanks.
Have you even read that article?
Your mind has been stolen and hung out to dry in the winter sun. You have had all your critical faculties frozen in time and you are not aware of it. I dont need to read anymore articles on NPT, but you do. I think you and your plane embracing buddies should peruse the following material carefully, instead of sitting here waiting for the proverbial * to hit the fan and checking the news sites every twenty minutes for the '9/11 developments' that exist mainly inside your heads.
thought criminal wrote:
Go to the site I linked you to and cough up an explanation for the pictorial evidence of orbs, for instance. Go to the site and try and debunk everything on there. Prove to me that you are not stupid or a liar.
Having said that, I don't have to prove anything to you - all to often I find myself reminding NPT's that the burden of proof is on YOU. What do you think is more likely, paper and plastic bags, sea gulls (no chance!) or stealth orbs? Hmmm?
Some objects move just like something blowing in the wind some like birds. Perhaps they move like orbs too, but I don't have a frame of reference for those...
Perhaps, perhaps, perhaps, perhaps, that's all it is with you. Go to 911 Stealth and stop talking in tongues. Here's a simple question for you, 'What would the psycho's behind this have done if the planes had crashed into the building and then fallen into the streets revealing the AWFUL TRUTH within it's innards?' Think about it. Sit down in a quiet place with a notepad and think what scenarios may have taken place if a real aircraft has exploded into the streets below, etc, etc, etc.
The PTB are holding you all under a hypnotic spell. Fight your way out of it, meditate, fight your way out of the 911 matrix before the Truth movement gets entangled forever in a giant sized butterfly net.
THETRUTHWILLSETU3 wrote:If you think no planes are liars why are you quoting Killtown?
To gain credibility shills use some real evidence and then pile on their fantasy *. Shills are also known to try and rubbish threads by quoting very long posts so as to put people off following comments. There is no doubt that you are a liar and a shill 4U2P, it's a fact and if the mods can't deal with the facts it means they can't deal with the truth!
So is this forum looking for the truth? Maybe we need some new mods then ones with balls.
THETRUTHWILLSETU3 wrote:It's completely irrelevant because there was no molten aluminium
You fool. That's the purpose of the thread. To establish exactly what molten aluminium would look like falling from the towers - so that it can be ruled out. If anything this research is a small benefit to the NBT (though of course, I wouldn't expect you to realise a subtlety like that), so do you have anything constructive to offer?
"Thought is faster than arrows, and truth is sharper than blades." - David Gemmell | RealityDown wiki
I have seen no genuine evidence of molten metal --- how do you know this is not disinformation to support controlled demolition and divert attention away from the beam weapon?
THETRUTHWILLSETU3 wrote:I have seen no genuine evidence of molten metal --- how do you know this is not disinformation to support controlled demolition and divert attention away from the beam weapon?
Poor little flower.
Last edited by Fallious on Sat Jan 13, 2007 8:21 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"Thought is faster than arrows, and truth is sharper than blades." - David Gemmell | RealityDown wiki
thought criminal wrote:The shills on this site, in my opinion, are the following:
Iron Snot
Hazzard
Fallacious
Bushwacker
Look, I have already said I am sorry for knocking over your coffee last week. Suppose I buy lunch in the canteen today, will that make it up to you?
I want a pudding too, with custard.
Now you know what the Service doctor told you about your weight at your last medical, that would not be good for you. Have an extra helping of lettuce instead!
".......some partial collapse [of WTC7] would not have been suspicious......." - chek
