And Mark_e, you may have taken me wrong, but I do not have a lack of respect for anyone... what I do have is a lack of respect for absolute rubbish (Ian Crane is most likely a good solid guy and I would buy him a pint any day, it is just some of his theories which are mince). NPT, beam weapons, missiles in holograms etc is all absolute tosh. I am sorry but that's the score! Also, it is not the organisation which divides itself, it is those who divide it by inventing and/or promoting rediculous theories.
Ok Pikey, you obviously did not concentrate when you read my previous posts. First, to clear up a couple of things. I have never claimed to want to undertake a 9/11 talk. I am well aware how hard it is from doing so many times in a packed lecture theatre at Uni. (I get the shaky voice thing going on... terrible
)... Also, I have also only ever passed through Lancaster from my home town of Glasgow on my way to London, but i'm sure it is a nice city.... so why insist on handing them the amunition? If there are people like me who know that 911 was an inside job, but laugh at the rediculous claims (NPT / holograms etc)... you can only guess at how the unaware masses would react.Comrade Bongo, I dont expect anyone to be perfect, nor expect them to conform what I would like them to say but as Snowy says Ian is entitled to voice his opinions of what he thinks did happen. I do agree though when you embark on that tact, a minority of people and especially the servants of the fascist state will always highlight that and dismiss the rest of the presentation.
... now that is you just being silly!Talking the talk on the internet is just scratching the surface and your in a comfort zone. For hostile people who hurl abuse and insults imo its for cowards and those with hidden agendas.
...Now I would take that as an insult. But to answer your question, my promotion of the 9/11 issues have never stopped. I continually talk to people I meet and point them to Google Video's or give them a DVD etc. I also intend to be at the William Rodreguez talk here in Glasgow on the 10th Feb. I hope that is to your approval sir?Delighted to read about your contributions and support for the campaign Bongo; re: copying the dvds and signing the petition. So whats your next contribution?
... I whole-heartedly disagree, I think you will find that it is those who pursue NPT etc who are in the minority... imo...by a stretch.I was quite positive and hopeful after last night however after reading Bongos blog it makes me despair. I am sure though that Bongo is in the minority.
... their promotion of 9/11 being an inside job is most welcome and for this, I give them my full support. However, I am also aware that as Rodin stated...What else at present, apart from Annie & David, Snowy,Willie Rodrigez have we got to inspire and motivate people at grassroots level in the public domain to actually do something as opposed to nothing for the campaign?
... campaigners with the PR clout such as Mr Shayler and Mr Crane should realise that by representing the UK 9/11 truth movement, they have a responsibility to the movement as a whole. And I believe that their promotion of certain theories does not represent the views of the vast majority of campaigners. I would suggest that they inform themselves of the general grass-roots feelings on these issues and try to get 'in touch' with their public on this. (heck... I'm sounding like a politician nowWe can only unite about things we all agree to. This is no 'party'. There is no 'whip'. Check out the Hard Sell & Hard Evidence threads for my take on this. We get a list of facts that have both intra-forum and inter-forum support. We try to break this evidence down. What is left standing forms the core of a global truth campaign.
)
