Come and cringe here, beamers. Judy Wood exposed

IronSnot · Post by **IronSnot** » Fri Feb 02, 2007 2:05 am

Taken to task for her unbelievable idiocy by Dr. Greg Jenkins.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid ... 0694803017

Unbelievable.

Mods - AJ I'd guess, the use of the words 'idiocy' & 'idiot' here is not insult.

Thermate · Post by **Thermate** » Fri Feb 02, 2007 4:57 am

I go with Idiot Savant

Prime example of all that's wrong with the modern education system, a good memory (ability to pass exams) is more important than actual intelligence...

Nice find, cheers

spiv · Post by **spiv** » Fri Feb 02, 2007 8:01 am

Heavens, and she has a Ph D??

marky 54 · Post by **marky 54** » Fri Feb 02, 2007 9:42 am

it has to be said on the basis of that video i cannot see the scientific thinking behind it. it seems as though that one picture was very important to the whole of the theory itself(thank god he took it with him).

i am seriously concerned that this is considered a root for truth when based on one picture with no calculations of energy needed or that a weapon delivering such energy exsists or is even possible, and hopefully shows people why some get angry with certain theorys.

just imagine for one second everyone bought this theory and it came to the time of proving it to the mainstream media or a court, would this interview be what the evidence would look like or come across?

beam weapons may or may not of been used for all i know but when the founder of the theory cannot prove or explain it with coming across as not having a clue its very hard to see the basis for the theory at all.

no wonder none of my questions were ever answered when asking about the beam theory. sorry to be critical but you cannot hide the way that interview came across. thank god for that interview i say or we could of all found ourselves up the creek with no paddle at a crucial time in the future had most people been swayed.

Patrick Brown · Post by **Patrick Brown** » Fri Feb 02, 2007 9:46 am

God this women is a shill! The interviewer is trying his best to help her out and she starts arguing with him. The interviewer ends up backing Steven Jones up by pointing out that there were NO NANO PARTICLES.

Dusty Woods will now be known as Sooty.

Pennies on their windowcill!!

marky 54 · Post by **marky 54** » Fri Feb 02, 2007 11:18 am

we should'nt be to harsh i mean if you look at the picture......

lets not concern ourselves with calculations or anyother proof its a major distraction. why would you need to prove its was possible before coming to a conclusion? lets just look at pictures.

and there i was thinking you need to prove something to be possible before coming to the conclusion ie: what beam weapon could achieve this and how much energy would it take, then is this technology even possible even if top secret(if top secret should you persue it as evidence would be a problem).

no instead look at the picture and guess at what weapon could achieve it without even knowing if that weapon could acheive it

.

i am a little suspious after thinking a while longer, she didnt seem qualified and so those qualifications reeled of at the start seem impossible and maybe fake as a cover to shill an idea to sidetrack people, and then maybe thought she could blag her way through the interview only for it to get from bad to worse. is judy wood even her real name? can anyone clarify on anything about her? remember you never remember a lie, funny then she could'nt remember anything of her own site that she supposidly wrote and studied. so if i could actually vote on these polls it would be shill. planted to promote a lie that could'nt be backed up scientifically.

no i dont have any qualifications along those lines either but even i can tell this stinks of unscientific arguement/shill.

i never remember an interview with s.jone where he could not remember one fact about his own theory.

ComfortablyNumb · Post by **ComfortablyNumb** » Fri Feb 02, 2007 12:24 pm

This was very embarrassing viewing.

I was surprised that this theory had any followers in the first place. Now I'm totally gobsmacked that anyone can give this the time of day.

At least now that's a case closed - lets move on to NPT!

Regs,
Numb

blackcat · Post by **blackcat** » Fri Feb 02, 2007 2:26 pm

Does Fetzer have anything to add I wonder?

flamesong · Post by **flamesong** » Fri Feb 02, 2007 2:51 pm

What about our home grown beam folk? Where are they now?

How does that terrace song go...?

Oh, it's all gone quiet over there...

Samantha J Fox · Post by **Samantha J Fox** » Fri Feb 02, 2007 4:26 pm

I thought it was Keith Richards at first.

Thermate · Post by **Thermate** » Fri Feb 02, 2007 5:55 pm

flamesong wrote:How does that terrace song go...? Oh, it's all gone quiet over there...

Your not singing! your not singing! YOUR NOT SINGING ANYMOOOOORE!!1

I thought the guy who interviewed her was hilarious, his tongue was almost poking through his cheek at some points.

Bongo · Post by **Bongo** » Fri Feb 02, 2007 6:40 pm

ROLL UP!!! ROLL UP!!! ... "Get your PhD's here"... "A 'must not miss' bargain at 2 for a Pound!!!"

PRICELESS!

Newspeak International · Fri Feb 02, 2007 6:49 pm

marky 54 wrote: i am a little suspious after thinking a while longer, she didnt seem qualified and so those qualifications reeled of at the start seem impossible and maybe fake as a cover to shill an idea to sidetrack people, and then maybe thought she could blag her way through the interview only for it to get from bad to worse. is judy wood even her real name? can anyone clarify on anything about her? remember you never remember a lie, funny then she could'nt remember anything of her own site that she supposidly wrote and studied. so if i could actually vote on these polls it would be shill. planted to promote a lie that could'nt be backed up scientifically.

no i dont have any qualifications along those lines either but even i can tell this stinks of unscientific arguement/shill.

i never remember an interview with s.jones where he could not remember one fact about his own theory.

Exactly,though to be fair the Jones theory is a little easier to argue due the known methods of controlled demolition,and the very real existance of thermite.

It also shows up the Fetzer and Woods "interview" for what it was,if there were any doubts.

andyb · Post by **andyb** » Fri Feb 02, 2007 6:51 pm

Great find IS. I can't believe anyone can take this woman seriously. It only took one interview to expose her madness. 'Dustification', you couldn't make it up, hence I'll go for idiot. Her failure to see any debris gave me a good laugh. Well done Dr Jenkins for keeping a straight face.

scubadiver · Post by **scubadiver** » Fri Feb 02, 2007 7:41 pm

I never took it seriously in the first place!!!

It just reminded me of this:

marky 54 · Post by **marky 54** » Fri Feb 02, 2007 8:37 pm

i think most would agree there is little evidence to suggest beams could even be possible judging by that interview.

the founder of the theory judy wood seems to of made it more important to disprove s.jones theory than proving her own, and in this i see a pattern emerging.

my thoughts are this: s.jones was bang on the money with method and chemical presance at the twins, the paper had been completed and distributed amongst the movement therefore getting rid of jones would not of solved the problem. therefore lets create a few theorys and pose as truthers in order to attack jones and discredit his work.

strange then how i find a NPT'er promoting judy wood whilst impling s.jones is a goverment plant. http://911researchers.com/blog/6
i hope the link works.

im seeing a pattern of creating a theory with little evidence to support it and then attacking jones theory as though thats somehow important in proving there own theory to be correct. is s.jone the target? or rather his theory. why? is he right?

flamesong · Post by **flamesong** » Fri Feb 02, 2007 9:18 pm

John Humphrys: We invited a spokesperson for the beam weapon theory to come on the programme but we were told that nobody was available.

I suspect we will be told that they have been too busy copying DVDs and printing leaflets.

I am wondering if pennies on the windowsill is the hot information which the tight clique has been holding close to their chest and teasing us with for the past few months.

Or perhaps it was proof of the World Trade Center to be telescopic and actually three times as tall as previously believed and therefore only theoretically visible several inches beyond the edge of your best photographic evidence.

Patrick Brown · Post by **Patrick Brown** » Fri Feb 02, 2007 9:23 pm

I edited the highlights together:

[GVideo]http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid ... 4939341212[/GVideo]

flamesong · Post by **flamesong** » Fri Feb 02, 2007 9:39 pm

Patrick, how could you cut out all that precious material?!

Every word that woman spoke was another pint of urine on the rather wet firework which some people have been trying to ignite on here recently.

I just hope that there is a phpBB mod out which will automatically trash any further mention of this ray gun rubbish before it becomes publicly visible.

IronSnot · Post by **IronSnot** » Sat Feb 03, 2007 11:45 am

She's getting terrible reviews on ratemyprofessor.com;

http://www.ratemyprofessors.com/ShowRat ... tid=495285

You have to sign up for the following pages, which I've done, and the comments on pages 2 & 3 are a lot worse than the front page ones. All her students thought she was pathetic basically and a couple commented that she ridiculed students as well.

Also she's not coming up on some databases I've been using except at one place in South Carolina. I find this a bit strange and I'm going to investigate it a bit more.

For comparison's sake, here's Fetzer's rating, he doesn't score that highly but I think that's because some conservative students are not being fair. He's considered by most to be very smart, but very liberal and conspirationally minded;

http://www.ratemyprofessors.com/ShowRat ... tid=472975

I completely fail to understand why he hitched his horse to Judy Wood's idiocy.

Patrick Brown · Post by **Patrick Brown** » Sat Feb 03, 2007 12:28 pm

Just had a post deleted!!! All I said was I can't wait for Andrew to comment.

IronSnot · Post by **IronSnot** » Sat Feb 03, 2007 12:32 pm

Well Andrew's not about so if it wasn't you then it must have been Tony Gosling. (who is about)

Patrick Brown · Post by **Patrick Brown** » Sat Feb 03, 2007 12:37 pm

Yes that's what I figure. I'm not in Tony's good books since I've started asking Andrew why he used to push Beam Weapons and NPT! I still haven't has a answer.

So why is Tony sticking up for Andrew? Hmm you work it out.

Post by **TonyGosling** » Sat Feb 03, 2007 12:39 pm

Hi Patrick,

I deleted your post for swearing.

Now, please keep to the subject of the video in question and related stuff only post if you have something worthwhile to add... and please keep it reasonably clean?

Maybe you'd like to start making insinuations against me now rather than Andrew? Or maybe you'd just like to get on and make your occasionally amusing points on the subject in hand.

Thanks

Patrick Brown · Post by **Patrick Brown** » Sat Feb 03, 2007 12:46 pm

I don't recall swearing in that post! All I said was “I can't wait for Andrew to comment on this thread” or something similar.

So you're lying Tony!

Also it might have been more polite to have just edited my post.

Also most swear words are filtered out by the word filter in the admin section of this forum which is why people use creative spelling quite often here.

We can only assume that you are trying to protect Andrew from being outed as a potential shill/dis-informationist.

flamesong · Post by **flamesong** » Sat Feb 03, 2007 12:55 pm

I would take an oath and testify that there was no swearing in that post, Patrick.

Perhaps you could hint at what word offended you, Tony. And if you are so concerned about swearing on the forum, I think you have got some work ahead of you.

IronSnot · Post by **IronSnot** » Sat Feb 03, 2007 1:12 pm

There was no swearing in Patrick's post.

IronSnot · Post by **IronSnot** » Sat Feb 03, 2007 1:17 pm

I've got it out of cache;

Posted: Fri Feb 02, 2007 10:46 pm Post subject:
I'm just waiting for Andrew to show up!!!!!

IronSnot · Post by **IronSnot** » Sat Feb 03, 2007 1:20 pm

I've saved it and taken a screen pic of it.

Just in case you understand.

Patrick Brown · Post by **Patrick Brown** » Sat Feb 03, 2007 1:24 pm

The reason my constant questioning of Andrew is valid is because he is known to communicate with Woods and has also been seen to push Beam Weapons and NPT. So what does the above Judy Woods interview say about Andrew Johnson's judgment? So is Andrew the kind of moderator we want on this forum? Why is Tony Gosling sticking up for Andrew?

9/11, 7/7, Covid-1984 & the War on Freedom

Come and cringe here, beamers. Judy Wood exposed

The Beamer QueenBee - Idiot or shill?

Come and cringe here, beamers. Judy Wood exposed

Ph d...??