2-D Animation Proves CNN Video Fake!

[CB_Brooklyn]

The first embedded video below shows a CNN "broadcast" from the Whitehall Building. When looking carefully, one can see the pixels of the closeup Whitehall Building and trees locked with the farther away tower. This is proof of 2-D animation!

To give a comparison, take a look at the second clip below. Watch the foreground (the car) and background (houses). It's the same principal!!


http://www.911researchers.com/node/215

[marky 54]

ok i looked for what you mentioned and im just not getting it.

also why do i need to watch the flintstones to know what a cartoon is or 2D? or is that more for thought implant?

is there anyway to show what your claiming more clearly? i see it being a problem. people will play it and think mmmm im not seeing it. the camera with the trees in is just far away and zoomed in as far as possible to capture the event but the tree line where he is stood is blocking some of the view. if it isnt that can you show more clearly the points you make.

maybe a map of some sort just to mark postions so we get a clearer picture of what should be seen or what your claiming should be seen.

i watched the videos and saw nothing wrong even after reading the words inbetween each clips.

[Dr. Zoidberg]

I'm not buying that one. As the previous poster noted, without a scale of reference between the camera, trees and buildings, you cannot infer that the trees and buildings shouldn't "move together" at least somewhat.

As long as the trees are more than half the distance to the towers from the camera, you would not see a perceptible amount of shift across that much movement of the lense.

And in regards to the "mismatched fireballs" in the 2 left-hand videos, they are mismatched because it appears that the playback speed of the top video is being altered, so the state of each fireball is different because it is at a different time of development.

And I also give thumbs down to that annoying music track. Sounds like cockroches dancing inside my mouth. (Been there, done that.)

[telecasterisation]

The first embedded video below shows a CNN "broadcast" from the Whitehall Building. When looking carefully, one can see the pixels of the closeup Whitehall Building and trees locked with the farther away tower. This is proof of 2-D animation!

To give a comparison, take a look at the second clip below. Watch the foreground (the car) and background (houses). It's the same principal!!

The major problem with this type of 'example', is that firstly we are watching a video that is several generations old, in other words, far removed from the original, thus the quality is very poor.

Next, the 'seasick' section that repeats, designed to make a point, is very unfriendly on the eye and difficult to assimilate.

The 'same principle' car example is not in any way evident.

This just doesn't work as an example of anything, it is not clear, obvious and in no way can be cited as proof of forgery.

I am more interested to know if the cockroaches had access to music or were they just 'dancing' because that is what oral cockroaches do?

[Dr. Zoidberg]

I am more interested to know if the cockroaches had access to music or were they just 'dancing' because that is what oral cockroaches do?

They dance to their own digital midi sequencer.

[Thermate]

OK

[Fallious]

I see.

[CB_Brooklyn]

The Whitehall Building in located at 17 Battery Place. See Peggy Carter's link to photos I just placed in my blog for the reference:
http://www.911researchers.com/node/215