Get David Shayler on THE WHALE SHOW

General discussion on 9/11, the ‘War on Terror’ and War on Freedom.

Moderator: Moderators

Post Reply
Stephen
Moderate Poster
Moderate Poster
Posts: 820
Joined: Mon Jul 03, 2006 1:47 pm

Get David Shayler on THE WHALE SHOW

Post by Stephen »

James Whale gets thousands of email's every day, so it would be a good idea to LETTER WRITE TO WHALE and surrgest David Shayler as a 9/11 7/7 Guest.

Postal Address - Write too: Adam Webb Jame's Producer

JAMES WHALE
TALK SPORT Limited,
18 Hatfields, London
SE1 8DJ
User avatar
Sherlock Holmes
Validated Poster
Validated Poster
Posts: 205
Joined: Sun Sep 10, 2006 2:44 pm
Location: Sunny Southampton

The Nationalist Thatcherite you mean???

Post by Sherlock Holmes »

I'm not trying to start a flame war or troll, I'm just not a Whale fan.

Whale - I think he's a Nationalist Thatcherite with occasional racist tendencies/sympathies.

If the middle of the road white population in this country need Whale to say 9/11 was an inside job before they accept it as being an inside job then that's a different story.

I just don't like the guy, I remember a program recently where he bashed Muslim women for choosing to wear a face cover or head scarf and then some NHS hospitals for supplying them with surgical gowns with face covers.

Not mentioning a persons rights, or that they are actually they effective at stopping communicable diseases (coughs and sneezes), can hide facial disfigurement (if you are in hospital for a face tumour for example). And they can hide the identity of women going in for sensitive procedures, like an abortion in a hospital where they might know someone who works there..... (Muslim or non-Muslim) etc...


btw I'm not Tory, Labour, or BNP.
User avatar
flamesong
Major Poster
Major Poster
Posts: 1308
Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2005 6:33 pm
Location: okulo news
Contact:

Re: Get David Shayler on THE WHALE SHOW

Post by flamesong »

stephen wrote:James Whale gets thousands of email's every day, so it would be a good idea to LETTER WRITE TO WHALE and surrgest David Shayler as a 9/11 7/7 Guest...
I think you might find that you are píssing into the wind:

http://www.nineeleven.co.uk/board/viewtopic.php?t=7160
Annie
9/11 Truth Organiser
9/11 Truth Organiser
Posts: 831
Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2006 3:21 pm
Location: London
Contact:

Post by Annie »

David has known James Whale for a number of years, and was on discussing 911 with Alex Jones last year. Very much a clash of the titans, volume-wise!
All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is for good people to do nothing - Edmund Burke.
Ubi solitudinem faciunt, pacem Americanam appellant - Tacitus Redactus.
Bongo
9/11 Truth critic
9/11 Truth critic
Posts: 686
Joined: Wed Jan 17, 2007 8:10 pm

Post by Bongo »

Annie, I know your opinions and what you have to say... and absolutly agree with them! I would rather you went on than David.

I also understand your relationship and freindship with david, but as Dylan Avary stated on Revolution radio...
http://www.nineeleven.co.uk/board/viewtopic.php?t=8300
... all this nonsence about NPT???

I have no time for this dis-info!!! In addition to this I also understand a man's right to say what he feels... 'freedom of speech if you like'? but I will vehemently contradict a man's (or woman's) opinion if I feel that it detracts seriously from the basic premise of which we fight!

In my opinion David needs to start supporting the people who know the OCT is a lie and drop all the disinfo.
As Dylan says in his above interview, "Are you going to take this NPT story to congress and hope to get a possitive response?"....

Well... I dont think so! :roll:

Regards,

Brian. :|
Annie
9/11 Truth Organiser
9/11 Truth Organiser
Posts: 831
Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2006 3:21 pm
Location: London
Contact:

Post by Annie »

Hi Brian

I absolutely agree with you - our time would be much better spent getting people to look at the basic issues around 911.

It is not necessarily our job, nor do we have the capability at this stage, to prove much of what what actually did happen that day. But we can easily show people what didn't and couldn't have happened - ie the OCT!

That's where I feel we should be focusing as a campaign. With the war in Iran looming, we need to wake as many people up as possible to what's really going on, and do so as quickly as we can. Only once this has happened will we be in a position to demand answers.

Regards

Annie
All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is for good people to do nothing - Edmund Burke.
Ubi solitudinem faciunt, pacem Americanam appellant - Tacitus Redactus.
User avatar
spiv
Validated Poster
Validated Poster
Posts: 484
Joined: Sat Jul 01, 2006 8:11 am

Common sense..

Post by spiv »

Annie & Bongo, you breathe a ray of common sense into the world of the 9/11 Truth Movement, and I just cannot agree with you more!!
Stephen
Moderate Poster
Moderate Poster
Posts: 820
Joined: Mon Jul 03, 2006 1:47 pm

Re: The Nationalist Thatcherite you mean???

Post by Stephen »

Sherlock Holmes wrote:I'm not trying to start a flame war or troll, I'm just not a Whale fan.

Whale - I think he's a Nationalist Thatcherite with occasional racist tendencies/sympathies.

If the middle of the road white population in this country need Whale to say 9/11 was an inside job before they accept it as being an inside job then that's a different story.

I just don't like the guy, I remember a program recently where he bashed Muslim women for choosing to wear a face cover or head scarf and then some NHS hospitals for supplying them with surgical gowns with face covers.

Not mentioning a persons rights, or that they are actually they effective at stopping communicable diseases (coughs and sneezes), can hide facial disfigurement (if you are in hospital for a face tumour for example). And they can hide the identity of women going in for sensitive procedures, like an abortion in a hospital where they might know someone who works there..... (Muslim or non-Muslim) etc...


btw I'm not Tory, Labour, or BNP.
I used to like Whale but have gone off him over the last few years myself,
but isn't it about getting as much media exposer as possable for
9-11 Truth? :shock:
Stephen
Moderate Poster
Moderate Poster
Posts: 820
Joined: Mon Jul 03, 2006 1:47 pm

Post by Stephen »

Annie wrote:David has known James Whale for a number of years, and was on discussing 911 with Alex Jones last year. Very much a clash of the titans, volume-wise!
Yea, I remember that Interveiw it was great! :lol:
Stephen
Moderate Poster
Moderate Poster
Posts: 820
Joined: Mon Jul 03, 2006 1:47 pm

Post by Stephen »

Bongo wrote:Annie, I know your opinions and what you have to say... and absolutly agree with them! I would rather you went on than David.

I also understand your relationship and freindship with david, but as Dylan Avary stated on Revolution radio...
http://www.nineeleven.co.uk/board/viewtopic.php?t=8300
... all this nonsence about NPT???

I have no time for this dis-info!!! In addition to this I also understand a man's right to say what he feels... 'freedom of speech if you like'? but I will vehemently contradict a man's (or woman's) opinion if I feel that it detracts seriously from the basic premise of which we fight!

In my opinion David needs to start supporting the people who know the OCT is a lie and drop all the disinfo.


As Dylan says in his above interview, "Are you going to take this NPT
story to congress and hope to get a possitive response?"....

Well... I dont think so! :roll:

Regards,

Brian. :|
Bongo, David & Annie are both very good at aticulating them self's when it comes to Talking in the media about 9/11 Truth, David Shayler is a very Powerfull speaker IMO beacuse he adds the spiritual with logic/intellect. Plus I don't think Congress would ever take 9/11 Truth seriously unless we break into the main stream, and by then they have too. But it will be all to late for these politcian's by then.
:lol:
London Mick
Moderate Poster
Moderate Poster
Posts: 140
Joined: Wed Feb 07, 2007 6:41 pm
Location: London

Post by London Mick »

David Shayler is the only decent speaker the British 9/11 movement has got. He's articulate, speaks proper English that can be understood by everyone unlike some of the awkward mumblers I have heard with their strange dialects.
Shayler should be given all the support the British 9/11 movement can muster.

I also happen to think his no planes theory makes sense though I believe it is best to avoid that topic for now. The film showed a plane melting into the side of a building like a hot knife through butter and then coming out the other side as if there were no masses of steel girders and a concrete central lift core. Impossible!

Forget that for now. Keep plugging the rest of the evidence for truth.
User avatar
karlos
Validated Poster
Validated Poster
Posts: 2524
Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 7:13 am
Location: london
Contact:

Post by karlos »

London Mick wrote:David Shayler is the only decent speaker the British 9/11 movement has got. He's articulate, speaks proper English that can be understood by everyone unlike some of the awkward mumblers I have heard with their strange dialects.
Shayler should be given all the support the British 9/11 movement can muster.
I also happen to think his no planes theory makes sense though I believe it is best to avoid that topic for now. The film showed a plane melting into the side of a building like a hot knife through butter and then coming out the other side as if there were no masses of steel girders and a concrete central lift core. Impossible!
Forget that for now. Keep plugging the rest of the evidence for truth.
there were planes, but there also were hollywood pyrotechnics as well.
The fact is a plane cannoy go through a huge steel building and come out the other side. But it can dissappear into a wall of glass.
Image
London Mick
Moderate Poster
Moderate Poster
Posts: 140
Joined: Wed Feb 07, 2007 6:41 pm
Location: London

Post by London Mick »

Yes, I wonder how they created that massive plume of black smoke that lingered all morning over Manhattan? An ordinary fire in a building would not create smoke like that, would it? Pyrotechnics were used and possibly technology that none of us knows about yet.

If a plane had crashed into the side of that tower, most of the plane would have fallen in pieces down to the street. There is no way an aluminium plane would have gone right through all those girders and come out the other side! No way!
Next time you go to the airport, have a close look at those aircraft. Tap on the fuselage. Flimsy stuff.
User avatar
thought criminal
Moderate Poster
Moderate Poster
Posts: 574
Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2006 2:44 pm
Location: London

Post by thought criminal »

stelios69 wrote:
there were planes, but there also were hollywood pyrotechnics as well.
The fact is a plane cannoy go through a huge steel building and come out the other side. But it can dissappear into a wall of glass.
It's you...

[youtube]http://youtube.com/watch?v=7wBX7ftEtyM[/youtube]
chek wrote: look at NIST's and other photos in a decent resolution to see what damage was actually caused.
User avatar
karlos
Validated Poster
Validated Poster
Posts: 2524
Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 7:13 am
Location: london
Contact:

Post by karlos »

i am not a mind control victim
I used to be but the cloud was lifted.
Now i believe everything Blair does or the BBC says is a 100% lie.

The fact is NPT is a mega missing the point
the whole of history is a lie
Moon Landings
Kennedy
Diana assasination
Hitler
Communism
Evolution
Flouride
vaccines
medicine
food
we are lied to every day
the fact remains planes did not cause the towers to collapse we agree on that?
the fact remains afghans/iraqis did not organise 911 yet they are the ones who have been massacred since
so while we are arguing about NPT bad things are happening
Trident for example
Microchips
ID cards dna database
fascist Britain/europe/usa
Image
Bongo
9/11 Truth critic
9/11 Truth critic
Posts: 686
Joined: Wed Jan 17, 2007 8:10 pm

Post by Bongo »

Again we have the NPT crew, providing great scientific analysis and evidence... :roll:
If a plane had crashed into the side of that tower, most of the plane would have fallen in pieces down to the street. There is no way an aluminium plane would have gone right through all those girders and come out the other side! No way!
Next time you go to the airport, have a close look at those aircraft. Tap on the fuselage. Flimsy stuff.
Image
... Yeah... tap on the fuselage. Flimsy stuff.

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
London Mick
Moderate Poster
Moderate Poster
Posts: 140
Joined: Wed Feb 07, 2007 6:41 pm
Location: London

Post by London Mick »

That Lockerbie photo proves nothing. The cockpit was found intact about a mile away in a field. This trench was caused by an engine on the wing section. Of course a heavy engine would scour the ground like that.

When the plane hit the Twin tower the cockpit would have disintegrated. It wouldn't have penetrated. The engines might but wasn't an engine found in the street? Wrong size, of course!
When the WW2 bomber hit the Empire State building it broke up and most of it fell down the side. Ok, so it wouldn't have been going so fast but there was very little penetration and certainly no orgasmic explosion as on 9/11. About 11 people died, I think.
Post Reply