2008 capitalism died: Money Scam, cornerstone of our slavery

WHAT: A pre-planned collapse of the US (and global) financial and economic systems. WHO: The same characters who perpetrated the original 911. WHERE: New York City & DC, of course. Plus a sideshow in Washington state. WHEN: The days surrounding September 11, naturally.

Moderator: Moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
acrobat74
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter
Posts: 841
Joined: Sun Jun 03, 2007 1:05 pm

Post by acrobat74 »

Mervyn King's full statement was actually even better:

"To paraphrase a great wartime leader, never in the field of financial endeavour has so much money been owed by so few to so many.
And, one might add, so far with little real reform."
http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2009 ... -borrowing


The following facts are now laid bare for all to see:

- The absolute, hopeless dependence of the entire monetary system on bank lending (i.e. on the ever-increasing perpetuation of indebtedness).

- The absolute, hopeless deadlock in which policy makers find themselves: their only way out of this mess is to keep replacing the bad debts that get written off with even more debts underwritten by the taxpayers.

- The immense political clout of banks (most noticeable with the orgies of Goldman Sachs and its former and current executives in the US Treasury).


The fraudulent nature of the money system is now openly debated in such mainstream publications as the Financial Times.

Read for example the following excerpt by Martin Wolf (associate editor and chief economics commentator at the Financial Times, London).
Note how he describes the current status-quo of crony corporatocracy in the bold part.

http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/34cbca0c-ad28 ... ck_check=1
Martin Wolf, FT wrote:My friend and colleague, John Kay, is aware of these dangers, as readers of his column know well. His answer, laid out in a pamphlet for the London-based Centre for the Study of Financial Innovation, is “narrow banking”*.

Mr Kay rejects the notion that regulation can solve the problem created by state-guaranteed finance. Supervision, he notes, is always subject to regulatory capture.

Moreover, banks “entered the crisis with capital generally in excess of regulatory requirements. These provisions proved not just inadequate but massively inadequate for the problems faced.” Worse, many of the dangers – notably the growth of off-balance-sheet finance – reflected attempts to circumvent regulation. Regulation, then, has not been the answer, but hitherto has been part of the problem.

So what is the answer?

Division of banking into a “utility” and a “casino” is Mr Kay’s answer. The big idea is that insured deposits should be backed by “genuinely safe liquid assets” – known as 100 per cent reserve banking. In practice, these assets would be government bonds. This is the most rigorous form of narrow banking. But he is not clear on whether he would insist on this. It seems he might accept looser constraints.

For the sake of clarity, however, let us focus on 100 per cent reserve banking, an idea also discussed in Austrian economics. Is it workable? What might it imply? To answer, we need to understand how we entered our world of credit-based money.

Suppose someone came up with the following design for the core institutions of our financial system: they would be mainly financed by deposits, redeemable on demand; they would invest in a wide range of often illiquid and opaque assets; they would engage in complex trading activities; but they would have a wafer-thin equity cushion.

Surely, people would conclude, this is fraudulent.

They would be right.

Such a structure can only endure because central banks act as lenders of last resort. The government’s ability to create money is put at the disposal of private interests. Right at the moment, the ability to borrow from the government at zero interest is a licence to print money.

In practice, however, we have gone much further than this. We have also explicitly guaranteed many deposits and implicitly guaranteed many more liabilities. Indeed, in the crisis, policymakers guaranteed all the liabilities of institutions deemed systemically significant. Today, the core financial institutions are, beyond doubt, a part of the state.
Summary of 9/11 scepticism: http://tinyurl.com/27ngaw6 and www.911summary.com
Off the TV: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M4szU19bQVE
Those who do not think that employment is systemic slavery are either blind or employed. (Nassim Taleb)
www.moneyasdebt.net
http://www.positivemoney.org.uk/
item7
Moderate Poster
Moderate Poster
Posts: 641
Joined: Sat Sep 20, 2008 11:10 am

Post by item7 »

Andrew. wrote:That should tell you something then.
It certainly does. The problem is it doesn't seem to tell you and millions more like you something.
Tooth Fairy denier
Santa Clause Denier
Man-made Climate Change Denier
User avatar
outsider
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter
Posts: 6094
Joined: Sun Jul 30, 2006 10:02 pm
Location: East London

Post by outsider »

Eat your heart out, Tommy Cooper! (and the Bankster's don't even wear Fez!):

http://www.brasschecktv.com/page/718.html
'And he (the devil) said to him: To thee will I give all this power, and the glory of them; for to me they are delivered, and to whom I will, I give them'. Luke IV 5-7.
User avatar
outsider
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter
Posts: 6094
Joined: Sun Jul 30, 2006 10:02 pm
Location: East London

Post by outsider »

Latest CAFR1 email:

CAFR1 NATIONAL POST
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Chanel 5 (CBS) out of Phoenix, AZ did a segment last night per no cuts for AZ legislators when revenue from all other state departments and agencies were cut from 7% to 30%.

I sent the Channel 5 News Desk the following note. Also after the note is an update on the CAFR1 Documentary Money Bomb.

____________________________________________

From: "Walter Burien" <walterburien@cafr1.com>
Subject: AZ Legislature revenue
Date: Fri, October 23, 2009 12:54 am
To: cbs5news@kpho.com

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Channel 5 News Desk:

If you want to see through legislatures snow job: Look at each legislator's expense accounts. The Rep said they get salaries of 26K per year, well when you look at the expense accounts (tax free discretionary money) that is substantially greater than their salaries for each, then you will genuinely get pissed off.

Hopefully also you have looked at the State 2009 CAFR (Comprehensive Annual Financial Report) - Here you will find 2002 through 2008 - http://www.gao.az.gov/financials/

For the complete AZ 2008 AFR (Annual Financial Report) - http://www.gao.az.gov/financials/AFR/20 ... _notes.pdf

For the complete AZ 2008 CAFR - http://www.gao.az.gov/financials/2008_CAFR_RFS.pdf

On a sub note: For US Senators over and above their salaries they have a discretionary expense account of between 1.5 to 8 million dollars depending on how many committees they are on (each committee makes a payment into the Senator's expense account)

Walter Burien - CAFR1.com

Tel. (928) 445-3532

PS: The state capital projects development funds have in collective totals about 8 billion sitting designated for projects not yet started.


_________________________________________________________

CAFR1 Documentary UPDATE

The CAFR1 target of $18,000 to produce and distribute the documentary is now over 62% there.

To give additional time to meet the target the Money Bomb, the ChipIn widget on the CAFR1 front page has been extended to Oct 30th.

The key point for you is; Contributors will receive reimbursement upon distribution and revenues coming in from the documentary, plus backing now gets the job done per completion and distribution of a documentary. A documentary that may have real impact for practical change on a global level. But then if you are pleased with the way things are going now, then in your perspective there is no need for this new CAFR1 Documentary to be viewed worldwide.

Information on the proposed documentary and the status of the Money Bomb fund drive for the documentary can be viewed here - http://cafr1.com/CAFR1MB.html

Sent FYI and Truly Yours,

Walter J. Burien, Jr. - CAFR1
P. O. Box 2112
Saint Johns, AZ 85936

Tel. 1 (928) 445-3532

Websites - http://CAFR1.com and http://TaxRetirement.com

PS: Make the investment wealth of government directly benefit the people and taxation be gone! TRF now!
TRFs (Tax Retirement Funds) paying for every City, County, State’s annual budgetary needs!
---------------------------------
Any local government can be restructured to meet their annual budget needs "Without" taxes.
To automatically subscribe to CAFR1 NATIONAL Posts - http://cafr1.com/phplist/?p=subscribe
------------------------
To automatically unsubscribe to CAFR1 NATIONAL Posts - http://cafr1.com/phplist/?p=unsubscribe
------------------------


BACK TO THE CAFR1 FRONT PAGE
'And he (the devil) said to him: To thee will I give all this power, and the glory of them; for to me they are delivered, and to whom I will, I give them'. Luke IV 5-7.
User avatar
outsider
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter
Posts: 6094
Joined: Sun Jul 30, 2006 10:02 pm
Location: East London

Post by outsider »

Short Brasscheck clip on how Swedish and German banks are shafting Latvia:

http://www.brasschecktv.com/page/721.html
'And he (the devil) said to him: To thee will I give all this power, and the glory of them; for to me they are delivered, and to whom I will, I give them'. Luke IV 5-7.
User avatar
TonyGosling
Editor
Editor
Posts: 18516
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 2:03 pm
Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England
Contact:

Post by TonyGosling »

One of Max's best to date
he was on BBC Radio 5 live this morning
and here is his latest On The Edge video blog


Max Keiser On JP Morgan, Goldman Sachs Et Al’s Fraud
Friday, October 16, 2009
Max Keiser in his prime, discussing whether the crisis is over: “It’d not froth, it’s fraud. This is an incredible case of accounting fraud and the American peasants have got to be the stupidest people in the world today: they don’t mind becoming peasants, they don’t mind living like peasants, and if that’s the case, we should do nothing to step them from sliding into a peasant class.” And this pearl: “The bankers on Wall Street are the equivalent of suicide bombers in other countries. They threaten to blow themselves up and blow up the economy in exchange for huge bailout money.”
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pFMgwL-Tq4s[/youtube]
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pFMgwL-Tq4s

part 2
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tbAqqLkiUkg
User avatar
TonyGosling
Editor
Editor
Posts: 18516
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 2:03 pm
Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England
Contact:

Post by TonyGosling »

A Congressional investigation into energy trading in 2003 discovered that ICE was being used to facilitate "round-trip" trades. " Round-trip” trades occur when one firm sells energy to another and then the second firm simultaneously sells the same amount of energy back to the first company at exactly the same price. No commodity ever changes hands. But when done on an exchange, these transactions send a price signal to the market and they artificially boost revenue for the company. This is nothing more than a massive fraud, pure and simple.

This is how the geniuses on Wall Street earn their big bonuses – they steal it.

It is time the congress clawed back the 35 billion dollars Goldman stole through the AIG CDS scam and put the GS big wigs in jail. It is also time to save taxpayer money - shut the minimum security health clubs these crooks are sent to and send them to a maximum security prison. That might stop the fraud.
http://seekingalpha.com/article/172797- ... sb_popular
User avatar
acrobat74
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter
Posts: 841
Joined: Sun Jun 03, 2007 1:05 pm

Post by acrobat74 »

TonyGosling wrote:Quantitative easing is just about sorting this economic mess.
Anyone who says we should stop is trying to kill us off.
The right wing economists don't want to allow it to continue.
http://globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=16039
The problem is that our credit-based economies have been run on debt for so long that when credit evaporates (either because banks write off bad debts, or because they don't extend loans, or both) all economic activity goes into tailspin.

As discussed, policy makers don't really have a choice.
Letting banks go to the wall is simply not an option, nor will it ever be in the current system.

The problem with QE is that, again, policy makers are entirely reliant on the banks.

If the banks simply hoard the 'cash' (so to speak) to beef up their balance sheets there will be no noticeable effect on the overall money supply.

In other words, in this scenario the additional credit that is generated by the central bank will not reach consumers and businesses to finance their spending.
And there is evidence to suggest that QE hasn't expanded the money supply as much as the BoE had hoped.


A good summary of quantitative easing from Wikipedia:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantitative_easing
The term quantitative easing describes an extreme form of monetary policy used to stimulate an economy where interest rates are either at, or close to, zero.

Normally, a central bank stimulates the economy indirectly by lowering interest rates but when it cannot lower them any further it can attempt to seed the financial system with new money through quantitative easing.

In practical terms, the central bank purchases financial assets (mostly short-term), including government paper and corporate bonds, from financial institutions (such as banks) using money it has created ex nihilo (out of nothing).

This process is called open market operations.

The creation of this new money is supposed to seed the increase in the overall money supply through deposit multiplication by encouraging lending by these institutions and reducing the cost of borrowing, thereby stimulating the economy.[1]

However, there is a risk that banks will still refuse to lend despite the increase in their deposits, or that the policy will be too effective, leading in a worst case scenario to hyperinflation.[1]

Quantitative easing is sometimes described as 'printing money', although the central bank actually creates it electronically 'out of nothing' by increasing the credit in its own bank account.[2]

Examples of economies where this policy has been used include Japan during the early 2000s, and the US and UK during the global financial crisis of 2008–2009.
A summary of how the central bank inflates the money supply posted before in this thread:
- In a fractional reserve banking world, the central bank regulates the the money supply, i.e. the total amount of money in the economy.

- This is important, as the only thing that gives value to our money is how much of it is in circulation.

- The central bank sets a target for the total money supply (i.e. it decides 'by how much' it wants to increase the money supply);
it then emits 'base money' to achieve this target;
this is an electronic / accounting entry only (i.e. 'money' is generated out of nothing) that creates a credit entry in the account of a commercial bank (e.g. via the purchase of government bonds by the central bank).

- Commercial banks then use this credit and, as per fractional reserve banking practices, give out loans with money generated out of thin air as interest-bearing debt, in the process generating 95-97% of the additional money supply.

- Money (i.e. today's fiat paper currency) = debt.

- All debt re-payments diminish the actual money supply (as they 'un-create' debts); hence, no debt = no money in the economy.

- If bank credit stops being injected into the economy (i.e. if commercial banks stop giving loans) a recession occurs, as it is mathematically impossible for all debtors to find the interest they need to re-pay in a shrinking money supply.


Hence, we have a system that is absolutely dependent on bank credit being perpetually injected into the economy, or else.

This, no doubt, is a bad system.


For some tech-y details see:
http://www.themoneymasters.com/faqs.htm

A more in-depth and technical paper ('Modern money mechanics') can be found here:
http://landru.myhome.net/monques/mmm2.html#MODERN
Summary of 9/11 scepticism: http://tinyurl.com/27ngaw6 and www.911summary.com
Off the TV: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M4szU19bQVE
Those who do not think that employment is systemic slavery are either blind or employed. (Nassim Taleb)
www.moneyasdebt.net
http://www.positivemoney.org.uk/
User avatar
outsider
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter
Posts: 6094
Joined: Sun Jul 30, 2006 10:02 pm
Location: East London

Post by outsider »

China introduces new financial system:
http://www.silverbearcafe.com/private/1 ... abank.html

Serious Federal Reserve setback:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/11/1 ... 64546.html
'And he (the devil) said to him: To thee will I give all this power, and the glory of them; for to me they are delivered, and to whom I will, I give them'. Luke IV 5-7.
User avatar
TonyGosling
Editor
Editor
Posts: 18516
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 2:03 pm
Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England
Contact:

Post by TonyGosling »

CASHPOINT CHARGE OF £2.50 EVERY TIME YOU WITHDRAW MONEY
CASHPOINT CHARGE: Fees could be as high as £2.50 if in place
Tuesday November 24,2009
By Louise Barnett MILLIONS of bank customers face charges as high as £2.50 a time for withdrawing their own money from cash machines, it emerged yesterday.

The swingeing fees are expected to be enforced if, as expected, the banks lose a long-running legal battle over rip-off charges slapped on customers who went into the red without prior permission.

The Supreme Court is widely expected to rule against the banks tomorrow in their ­dispute with the Office of Fair Trading over unfair deductions.

Industry insiders said that with banks ­desperate to re-build their profit margins after the credit crunch, free banking will be wiped out if the court forces high street ­lenders to slash their unauthorised overdraft fees and repay customers up to £22billion for unfair sums already imposed.

Average fees for cashpoint machines which charge are already more than £1.68. Experts fear banks will ramp that up to claw back funds they may have to pay out. It is feared lenders will quickly find ways of making up any shortfall by hitting current accounts with monthly fees and charging for withdrawals at the UK’s 39,000 free cashpoints (ATMs).

MoneyExpert.com’s Pierre Williams said: “Banks will want their pound of flesh. They will look at imposing fees on what have traditionally been free banking areas. That means ATM withdrawals and perhaps accounts in credit.

“Private firms already charge for ATM withdrawals and high street banks would like to follow suit.”

http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/142 ... raw-money-
Millionaire hedge fund boss 'sent work experience girl vile sexual email'
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... z0XjYg7UoV
User avatar
acrobat74
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter
Posts: 841
Joined: Sun Jun 03, 2007 1:05 pm

Post by acrobat74 »

A couple of points here:
MILLIONS of bank customers face charges as high as £2.50 a time for withdrawing their own money from cash machines, it emerged yesterday.
The moment you 'deposit' your money in the bank, it stops being 'your money'.

The reason is simple: you are loaning the money to the bank.

The use of the word 'deposit' for this transaction is misleading: in reality this transaction is a loan (which is also why you expect to earn interest in your bank account).

See the excellent 'Money as debt II: Promises unleashed' for an explanation of this (relevant segment is from 02:45 onwards):

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_doYllBk5No[/youtube]
The swingeing fees are expected to be enforced
This is cartel behaviour (and of course the banking system is a cartel).
In theory, there is nothing stopping the banks from doing so, apart from the fear of competition.



Another piece of news worth mentioning is the following:
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/b657a26c-d8e8 ... ck_check=1
FT wrote:Bank secretly lent RBS and HBOS £61.6bn

By Chris Giles, Norma Cohen and Patrick Jenkins

Published: November 24 2009 11:15
Last updated: November 24 2009 20:54

Royal Bank of Scotland and HBOS came within minutes of closing cashpoints and normal business operations, the Bank of England confirmed on Tuesday, revealing that it extended £61.6bn in emergency funds to the banks at the height of the financial crisis last year.

Paul Tucker, the Bank’s deputy governor, told the Treasury select committee: “If we hadn’t have done it, the [economic] cycle would have been a lot worse ...This was a dire emergency.”
Summary of 9/11 scepticism: http://tinyurl.com/27ngaw6 and www.911summary.com
Off the TV: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M4szU19bQVE
Those who do not think that employment is systemic slavery are either blind or employed. (Nassim Taleb)
www.moneyasdebt.net
http://www.positivemoney.org.uk/
User avatar
TonyGosling
Editor
Editor
Posts: 18516
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 2:03 pm
Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England
Contact:

Post by TonyGosling »

The scammery continues daily.
Nationwide 'Building Society' revealed as closest, spiritually, to the banks.
The cashpoint charge was just a threat in case britain's wonderful new Supreme Architect Illuminati Court decided in favour of the public and against the banks.
Like expecting turkeys to vote for Christmas.
Banks must charge a fair price for their services
By James Coney- 25th November 2009
Today's Supreme Court ruling is not just a blow for those bank customers with outstanding complaints about overdraft fees who will now have their complaint rejected. It's a blow for everyone with a current account.
Essentially, today's decision signals what many of us have known for some time - there is inadequate consumer protection for bank customers.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/artic ... z0XtpFwmEw
User avatar
outsider
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter
Posts: 6094
Joined: Sun Jul 30, 2006 10:02 pm
Location: East London

Post by outsider »

@ Tony:
'Like expecting turkeys to vote for Christmas.'

Many of us are guilty. I for one voted for the Bliar the first time round, despite far Left warnings. I was wrong, horribly wrong. Hopefully, we all learn from our mistakes; I think I have.
'And he (the devil) said to him: To thee will I give all this power, and the glory of them; for to me they are delivered, and to whom I will, I give them'. Luke IV 5-7.
User avatar
TonyGosling
Editor
Editor
Posts: 18516
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 2:03 pm
Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England
Contact:

Post by TonyGosling »

Alan Greenspan accused of fraud here.
Fraud is a crime not an ideology, as well as Danny Schechter: Plunder the crime of our time. Wall Street is a crime scene.
In our new program - "Keiser report", hosted by the renowned financial analyst and former stockbroker Max Keiser - the most provocative questions in US politics are tackled head-on.
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a6qfTgyoVX8[/youtube]
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a6qfTgyoVX8
User avatar
Disco_Destroyer
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter
Posts: 6366
Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2006 4:38 pm
Contact:

Post by Disco_Destroyer »

Oh joy the High Street Banks win on Overdraft Fees :(
'Come and see the violence inherent in the system.
Help, help, I'm being repressed!'


“The more you tighten your grip, the more Star Systems will slip through your fingers.”


www.myspace.com/disco_destroyer
User avatar
TonyGosling
Editor
Editor
Posts: 18516
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 2:03 pm
Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England
Contact:

Post by TonyGosling »

1,000 investment bankers leave RBS
(UKPA) – 5 hours ago

Part-nationalised Royal Bank of Scotland has lost more than 1,000 investment bankers to rivals amid a Government clampdown on bonuses, it has been reported.

The traders and corporate financiers who have been lured away are estimated to have earned almost 8% of the bank's 2008 income, according to The Sunday Times.

And it is thought pressure on 2009 bonuses from the Government - which will own 84% of RBS under its soon-to-complete toxic asset insurance scheme - will see a fresh round quit the group in the new year.
User avatar
outsider
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter
Posts: 6094
Joined: Sun Jul 30, 2006 10:02 pm
Location: East London

Post by outsider »

TonyGosling wrote:1,000 investment bankers leave RBS
(UKPA) – 5 hours ago

Part-nationalised Royal Bank of Scotland has lost more than 1,000 investment bankers to rivals amid a Government clampdown on bonuses, it has been reported.

The traders and corporate financiers who have been lured away are estimated to have earned almost 8% of the bank's 2008 income, according to The Sunday Times.

And it is thought pressure on 2009 bonuses from the Government - which will own 84% of RBS under its soon-to-complete toxic asset insurance scheme - will see a fresh round quit the group in the new year.
About time we had a nationalised banking system!
And a 'UK Free Press'! (Tony, can you arrange this? Know it's a tall order!))
'And he (the devil) said to him: To thee will I give all this power, and the glory of them; for to me they are delivered, and to whom I will, I give them'. Luke IV 5-7.
User avatar
acrobat74
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter
Posts: 841
Joined: Sun Jun 03, 2007 1:05 pm

Post by acrobat74 »

outsider wrote:
TonyGosling wrote:1,000 investment bankers leave RBS
(UKPA) – 5 hours ago

Part-nationalised Royal Bank of Scotland has lost more than 1,000 investment bankers to rivals amid a Government clampdown on bonuses, it has been reported.

The traders and corporate financiers who have been lured away are estimated to have earned almost 8% of the bank's 2008 income, according to The Sunday Times.

And it is thought pressure on 2009 bonuses from the Government - which will own 84% of RBS under its soon-to-complete toxic asset insurance scheme - will see a fresh round quit the group in the new year.
About time we had a nationalised banking system!
And a 'UK Free Press'! (Tony, can you arrange this? Know it's a tall order!))
Erm, we do have a nationalized banking system: if it wasn't for quantitative easing the entire house of cards would have collapsed on itself.

As for some investment bankers leaving RBS, one would have thought that the interests of the public, which now owns ca. 85% of the bank, would be best served by retaining folks who create profits for the bank.

The catch is, though, that the performance of these guys is judged over a time frame that is way too small to be meaningful.
The risk of blow-up is hidden in the not-so-distant future, and when blow-ups do occur, the taxpayer is always there to bail banks out (and pay the bankers' bonuses retrospectively).

More often than not, investment bankers are more talented at playing the system and ensuring they get their bonuses than at adding long-term value.

See also Nassim Taleb's take on banking 'talent' earlier in the thread.
Summary of 9/11 scepticism: http://tinyurl.com/27ngaw6 and www.911summary.com
Off the TV: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M4szU19bQVE
Those who do not think that employment is systemic slavery are either blind or employed. (Nassim Taleb)
www.moneyasdebt.net
http://www.positivemoney.org.uk/
User avatar
TonyGosling
Editor
Editor
Posts: 18516
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 2:03 pm
Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England
Contact:

Post by TonyGosling »

With today's pre budget report it is clear the City agents in the Treasury's plan is to crash things much further before the election in May.
Notice the quantitive easing, printing money, is being eased off ... and that spells disaster.

http://www.radio4all.net/files/turntabl ... 121209.mp3
User avatar
TonyGosling
Editor
Editor
Posts: 18516
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 2:03 pm
Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England
Contact:

Post by TonyGosling »

This stopping of Quantitative Easing or Printing Money is key.
If Darling stops doing it he and his party will sink without a trace straight into the Cameron City trap.
User avatar
Pugwash
Moderate Poster
Moderate Poster
Posts: 226
Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2007 4:54 pm
Location: Buckinghamshire
Contact:

Post by Pugwash »

Could not find this in previous posts (picked up on Spanish site?)..

Sunday Times
THE CIA is to be given broad access to the bank records of millions of Britons under a European Union plan to fight terrorism.

The Brussels agreement, which will come into force in two months’ time, requires the 27 EU member states to grant requests for banking information made by the United States under its terrorist finance tracking programme.

In a little noticed information note released last week, the EU said it had agreed that Europeans would be compelled to release the information to the CIA “as a matter of urgency”. The records will be kept in a US database for five years before being deleted.

Critics say the system is “lopsided” because there is no reciprocal arrangement under which the UK authorities can easily access the bank accounts of US citizens in America.

Related Links
British ‘mules’ launder stolen millions
Fresh threat to tax evaders
They also say the plan to sift through cross-border and domestic EU bank accounts gives US intelligence more scope to consult our bank accounts than is granted to law enforcement agencies in the UK or the rest of Europe.

In Britain and most of Europe a judge must authorise a specific search after receiving a sworn statement from a police officer.

This weekend civil liberties groups and privacy campaigners said the surveillance programme, introduced as an emergency measure in 2001, was being imposed on Britain without a proper debate.

Shami Chakrabarti, director of Liberty, said: “The massive scope for transferring personal information from Europe to the United States is extremely worrying, especially in the absence of public debate or parliamentary scrutiny either at EU or domestic level.

“No one is saying that allies should not co-operate, but where is the privacy protection? Where are the judicial safeguards in such a sweeping scheme?

“This looks like yet another example of lopsided post-9/11 compromise and of the ease with which temporary emergency measures are foisted on us permanently.”

US counter-terrorism officials say the data-mining programme aims to trace the transactions of people suspected of having ties to Al-Qaeda.

They say it helped to thwart a plot by an Islamist terror cell in Britain to blow up seven aircraft flying from London to the United States in 2006.

The terrorist finance tracking programme mines thousands of transactions by sifting through records from the nerve centre of the global banking industry, a Belgian co-operative known as Swift. This routes about £3 billion between banks and other financial institutions each day.

According to the EU information note, the United States can request “general data sets” under the scheme based on broad categories including “relevant message types, geography and perceived terrorism threats”.

The scheme is run out of the CIA’s headquarters in Langley, Virginia. The covert spying operation remained secret until 2006.
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/u ... 945972.ece
Truth Movement Clips: www.truthtotell.co.uk
User avatar
item8
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter
Posts: 974
Joined: Tue Nov 24, 2009 11:50 am

Post by item8 »

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/ellen-bro ... 89409.html
Ellen BrownAuthor, "Web of Debt"
Posted: December 14, 2009 05:15 PM

EU, IMF Revolt: Greece, Iceland, Latvia May Lead the Way

Total financial collapse, once a problem only for developing countries, has now come to Europe. The International Monetary Fund is imposing its "austerity measures" on the outer circle of the European Union, with Greece, Iceland and Latvia the hardest hit. But these are not your ordinary third world debtor supplicants. Historically, the Vikings of Iceland repeatedly repulsed British invaders; Latvian tribes repulsed even the Vikings; and the Greeks conquered the whole Persian empire. If anyone can stand up to the IMF, these stalwart European warriors can.

Dozens of countries have defaulted on their debts in recent decades, the most recent being Dubai, which declared a debt moratorium on November 26, 2009. If the once lavishly-rich Arab emirate can default, more desperate countries can; and when the alternative is to destroy the local economy, it is hard to argue that they shouldn't. That is particularly true when the creditors are largely responsible for the debtor's troubles, and there are good grounds for arguing the debts are not owed. Greece's troubles originated when low interest rates that were inappropriate for Greece were maintained to rescue Germany from an economic slump. And Iceland and Latvia have been saddled with responsibility for private obligations to which they were not parties.

The Dysfunctional EU: Where a Common Currency Fails

Greece may be the first in the EU outer circle to revolt. According to Ambrose Evans-Pritchard in Sunday's Daily Telegraph, "Greece has become the first country on the distressed fringes of Europe's monetary union to defy Brussels and reject the Dark Age leech-cure of wage deflation." Prime Minister George Papandreou said on Friday:

Salaried workers will not pay for this situation: we will not proceed with wage freezes or cuts. We did not come to power to tear down the social state.
Notes Evans-Pritchard:

Mr Papandreou has good reason to throw the gauntlet at Europe's feet. Greece is being told to adopt an IMF-style austerity package, without the devaluation so central to IMF plans. The prescription is ruinous and patently self-defeating.
The currency cannot be devalued because the same Euro is used by all. That means that while the country's ability to repay is being crippled by austerity measures, there is no way to lower the cost of the debt. Evans-Pritchard concludes:

The deeper truth that few in Euroland are willing to discuss is that EMU is inherently dysfunctional - for Greece, for Germany, for everybody.
Which is all the more reason that Iceland, which is not yet a member of the EU, might want to reconsider its position. Iceland is being required as a condition of membership to endorse an agreement in which it would reimburse Dutch and British depositors who lost money in the collapse of IceSave, an offshore division of Iceland's leading private bank. Eva Joly, a Norwegian-French magistrate hired to investigate the Icelandic bank collapse, calls it blackmail. She warns that succumbing to the EU's demands will drain Iceland of its resources and its people, who are being forced to emigrate to find work.

Latvia is a member of the EU and is expected to adopt the Euro, but it has not yet reached that stage. Meanwhile, the EU and IMF have told the government to borrow foreign currency to stabilize the exchange rate of the local currency, in order to help borrowers pay mortgages taken out in foreign currencies from foreign banks. As a condition of IMF funding, the usual government cutbacks are also being required. Nils Muiznieks, head of the Advanced Social and Political Research Institute in Riga, Latvia, complained:

The rest of the world is implementing stimulus packages ranging from anywhere between one percent and ten percent of GDP but at the same time, Latvia has been asked to make deep cuts in spending - a total of about 38 percent this year in the public sector - and raise taxes to meet budget shortfalls.
In November, the Latvian government adopted its harshest budget of recent years, with cuts of nearly 11%. The government had already raised taxes, slashed public spending and government wages, and shut dozens of schools and hospitals. As a result, the national bank forecasts a 17.5% decline in the economy this year, just when it needs a productive economy to get back on its feet. In Iceland, the economy contracted by 7.2% during the third quarter, the biggest fall on record. As in other countries squeezed by neo-liberal tourniquets on productivity, employment and output are being crippled, bringing these economies to their knees.

The cynical view is that that may have been the intent. Instead of helping post-Soviet nations develop self-reliant economies, writes Marshall Auerback, "the West has viewed them as economic oysters to be broken up to indebt them in order to extract interest charges and capital gains, leaving them empty shells."

But the people are not submitting quietly to all this. In Latvia last week, while the Parliament debated what to do about the nation's debt, thousands of demonstrating students and teachers filled the streets, protesting the closing of a hundred schools and reductions in teacher salaries of up to 60%. Demonstrators held signs saying, "They have sold their souls to the devil" and "We are against poverty." In the Iceland Parliament, the IceSave debate had been going on for over 140 hours at last report, a new record; and a growing portion of the population opposes underwriting a debt they believe the government does not owe.

In a December 3 article in The Daily Mail titled "What Iceland Can Teach the Tories," Mary Ellen Synon wrote that ever since the Icelandic economy collapsed last year, "the empire builders of Brussels have been confident that the bankrupt and frightened Icelanders must finally be ready to exchange their independence for the 'stability' of EU membership." But last month, an opinion poll showed that 54 percent of all Icelanders oppose membership, with just 29 percent in favor. Synon wrote:

The Icelanders may have been scared out of their wits last year, but they are now climbing out from under the ruins of their prosperity and have decided that the most valuable thing they have left is their independence. They are not willing to trade it, not even for the possibility of a bail-out by the European Central Bank.
Iceland, Latvia and Greece are all in a position to call the bluff of the IMF and EU. In an October 1 article called "Latvia - the Insanity Continues," Marshall Auerback maintained that Latvia's debt problem could be fixed over a weekend, by a list of measures including (1) not answering the phone when foreign creditors call the government; (2) declaring the banks insolvent, converting their external debt to equity, and having them reopen with full deposit insurance guaranteed in local currency; and (3) offering "a local currency minimum wage job that includes healthcare to anyone willing and able to work as was done in Argentina after the Kirchner regime repudiated the IMF's toxic package of debt repayment."

Evans-Pritchard suggested a similar remedy for Greece, which he said could break out of its death loop by following the lead of Argentina. It could "restore its currency, devalue, pass a law switching internal euro debt into [the local currency], and 'restructure' foreign contracts."

The Road Less Traveled: Saying No to the IMF

Standing up to the IMF is not a well-worn path, but Argentina forged the trail. In the face of dire predictions that the economy would collapse without foreign credit, in 2001 it defied its creditors and simply walked away from its debts. By the fall of 2004, three years after a record default on a debt of more than $100 billion, the country was well on the road to recovery; and it achieved this feat without foreign help. The economy grew by 8 percent for 2 consecutive years. Exports increased, the currency was stable, investors were returning, and unemployment had eased. "This is a remarkable historical event, one that challenges 25 years of failed policies," said economist Mark Weisbrot in a 2004 interview quoted in The New York Times. "While other countries are just limping along, Argentina is experiencing very healthy growth with no sign that it is unsustainable, and they've done it without having to make any concessions to get foreign capital inflows."

Weisbrot is co-director of a Washington-based think tank called the Center for Economic and Policy Research, which put out a study in October 2009 of 41 IMF debtor countries. The study found that the austere policies imposed by the IMF, including cutting spending and tightening monetary policy, were more likely to damage than help those economies.

That was also the conclusion of a study released last February by Yonca Özdemir from the Middle East Technical University in Ankara, comparing IMF assistance in Argentina and Turkey. Both emerging markets faced severe economic crises in 2001, but where Argentina broke ranks with the IMF, Turkey followed its advice at every turn. The end result was that Argentina bounced back, while Turkey is still in financial crisis. Argentina chose to direct its resources inward, developing its domestic economy.

To find the money for this development, Argentina did not need foreign investors. It issued its own money and credit through its own central bank. Earlier, when the national currency collapsed completely in 1995 and again after 2000, Argentine local governments issued local bonds that traded as currency. Provinces paid their employees with paper receipts called "Debt-Cancelling Bonds" that were in currency units equivalent to the Argentine Peso. The bonds canceled the provinces' debts to their employees and could be spent in the community. The provinces had actually "monetized" their debts, turning their bonds into legal tender.

Issuing and lending currency is the sovereign right of governments, and it is a right that small European countries lose when they join the EU. Argentina is a large country with more resources than Iceland, Latvia or Greece, but new technologies are now available that could make even small countries self-sufficient. See David Blume, Alcohol Can Be a Gas.


Follow Ellen Brown on Twitter: www.twitter.com/ellenhbrown
User avatar
outsider
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter
Posts: 6094
Joined: Sun Jul 30, 2006 10:02 pm
Location: East London

Post by outsider »

Instead of limiting Bankster's 'bonuses', and gentle chiding in the MSM, Hugo shows what should and could be done to Banksters and their corrupt 'partners in crime', members of the 'Judiciary':
Good article from Global Research, with Eva Gollinger giving robust support to Hugo Chavez:
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php? ... &aid=16604
'And he (the devil) said to him: To thee will I give all this power, and the glory of them; for to me they are delivered, and to whom I will, I give them'. Luke IV 5-7.
User avatar
TonyGosling
Editor
Editor
Posts: 18516
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 2:03 pm
Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England
Contact:

Post by TonyGosling »

Mixed signs on Bank of England's cash injection
.....The minutes showed that the nine-member committee was unanimous in voting to continue with the Bank’s existing programme of QE because a “lack of significant news on the month” to alter its plans. It was also unanimous in deciding to keep interest rates on hold at their record low of 0.5 per cent.
However, David Miles, an external member of the committee, still believed there were reasons for extending the programme, while Spencer Dale, the Bank’s chief economist, remained worried that QE could cause asset bubbles.

http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/7a751268-efac ... ab49a.html
User avatar
outsider
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter
Posts: 6094
Joined: Sun Jul 30, 2006 10:02 pm
Location: East London

Post by outsider »

More Bankster stuff in this 10-minute Brasscheck video clip:

http://www.brasschecktv.com/page/761.html
'And he (the devil) said to him: To thee will I give all this power, and the glory of them; for to me they are delivered, and to whom I will, I give them'. Luke IV 5-7.
User avatar
outsider
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter
Posts: 6094
Joined: Sun Jul 30, 2006 10:02 pm
Location: East London

Post by outsider »

I really cannot understand why Walter Burien's info has not attracted much more interest; the stuff is dynamite.
'The Only Game In Town' is dynamite.
Here is a trailer:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y2ClJ3Mvzt0
'And he (the devil) said to him: To thee will I give all this power, and the glory of them; for to me they are delivered, and to whom I will, I give them'. Luke IV 5-7.
User avatar
TonyGosling
Editor
Editor
Posts: 18516
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 2:03 pm
Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England
Contact:

Post by TonyGosling »

Swiss warn UBS bank could collapse
Switzerland's justice minister warned in an interview on Sunday that top bank UBS could collapse if sensitive talks with the United States over a high-profile tax fraud investigation fall through.
"The actions of UBS in the United States are very problematic. Not just because they are punishable but also because they threaten all of the bank's activities," Eveline Widmer-Schlumpf told Le Matin Dimanche newspaper.
"The Swiss economy and the job market would suffer on a major scale if UBS fails as a result of its licence being revoked in the United States," she said.
Switzerland and the United States have negotiated an agreement under which UBS would hand over information on some 4,500 account holders to US tax police.
But a Swiss court ruling earlier this month put the deal in doubt.
Many in Switzerland, where banking secrecy is a source of pride and a key part of the economy, have accused the government of failing to protect UBS.
"We have nothing to blame ourselves for. I don't think anyone could prove that we acted badly," Widmer-Schlumpf said in the interview.

http://www.plaintruth.com/the_plain_tru ... lapse.html
User avatar
acrobat74
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter
Posts: 841
Joined: Sun Jun 03, 2007 1:05 pm

Post by acrobat74 »

In the context of this thread, which deals more with the systemic aspects of the money/credit creation process, what is quite telling about the current crisis is the lack of options of the policy makers.

For example, all the Bank of England can do is print money (via the now halted QE), cross its fingers and ... hope that banks will pass the lending on to consumers and businesses rather than use it to repair their balance sheets.

But of course there is no guarantee about the extent to which banks will resume lending.

If banks don't lend and more debt is repaid (or written off) than new debt is created, the pie (money supply) gets smaller and most people suffer.


Also note the extent to which the terms 'money' & 'debt' are interchangeable: we talk about the BoE 'printing money', when in essence all it does is 'printing debt'.
With QE the BoE simply buys government bonds (i.e. interest-bearing government debt) from commercial banks to boost the money/credit supply.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2010 ... of-england
Summary of 9/11 scepticism: http://tinyurl.com/27ngaw6 and www.911summary.com
Off the TV: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M4szU19bQVE
Those who do not think that employment is systemic slavery are either blind or employed. (Nassim Taleb)
www.moneyasdebt.net
http://www.positivemoney.org.uk/
User avatar
TonyGosling
Editor
Editor
Posts: 18516
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 2:03 pm
Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England
Contact:

Post by TonyGosling »

Darius Guppy: our world balances on a sea of debt
What is needed is a root and branch re-evaluation of that most curious of cultural inventions – money, argues Darius Guppy.
The Sunday Telegraph - 21 February 2010
In the year 1994 there resided in the cell next to mine a certain ‘Tommy.’
Now Tommy had been imprisoned for counterfeiting Dutch Guilders to such a high standard that he had fooled the banks themselves.
As was customary among prisoners who became friends, Tommy allowed me to read his legal papers and I quickly became fascinated by the Judge’s sentencing speech, the gist of which was that Tommy’s activities had been parasitical. By creating money out of little more than thin air he had reduced the purchasing power of more deserving members of society. What would happen if everyone behaved like him?
Immediately I thought of arguments used, in a different context, by Thatcherites and neo-liberals in general regarding inflation. Inflation, just like counterfeiting, dilutes the value of the community’s hard-earned wealth and as such constitutes a terrible social evil. Creating too much money - ‘real’, just as much as ‘fake’ - can wreck an economy. Such indeed was the reasoning of the Nazis when, during World War Two they came up with a plan – that came close to implementation - to ruin Britain’s economy by flooding the country with near perfect counterfeit bills.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/pers ... -debt.html

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6cq9yEVcGIU[/youtube]
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6cq9yEVcGIU
Post Reply