Do you have the link of the video you showed him to post on this forum please?kbo234 wrote:Excellent busker. Pity you didn't get that on film.Busker wrote:I showed a youtube video of the fall of WTC7 to an architect the other day.
It didn't have any TV station branding on, or sound that mentioned 9/11.
I simply asked the question, "please describe what you are seeing?"
His response?
"A building being demolished in a controlled manner".
When I told him fire was the cause of the collapse he told me I was talking out of my rear end.
I then told him it was the third tower on 9/11 to collapse. There was then an uncomfortable silence.
Enough said I think.
I recently watched the conspiracy files on WTC7 recently. It had some really interesting stuff it. I am glad that they mention thermite and the tiny spheres of molten iron but they failed to explain their presence and those unnaturally high temps in the debris.
Also I wondered about the how the building could have been primed to fall without the occupants awares. Richard Gage of www.ae911truth.org suggests that the charges could have been there 20 years! A highly unlikely scenario. It still think a covert military operation could still bring down a building with high tech explosives without much disturbance but I'm guessing.
If anybody knows more I would appreciate it.
Richard Gage is interviewed here alone and he is quite lucid:
http://www.ae911truth.net/omnitv_interview.htm