I have not seen any criticism worthy of a response please post some. I have looked at some but it seems fancyful and without reasonable argument.chipmunk stew wrote:Enough flame-baiting. If you want to respond to criticism of the Inside Job hypothesis, feel free. Otherwise, piss off.Jason wrote:Thanks for the welcome, my insights are as profound as yours are logical, critically thinking what you are told to think.chipmunk stew wrote: Welcome to the forum, Jason. Your insights are profound.
edit: and you're right, I've never had to look that one up--it was never a mystery to me...
Video Clips
Moderator: Moderators
Read about me and becks www.beckhamcoverup.com
Hey go easy Jason. You too Chippy. We are keeping this, by and large, civil so far.
Its good to have people challenge us over our views, no matter where we stand.
ps. Just to not appear as a complete hipocrite, i do apologise to you Chipmonk for calling you disgusting. I was trying to get in the heads of the authors of 911myths and got a little riled. No excuse i know. But just for future reference; if i call you a b0ll0cks or a massive sham or whatever, just ignore it and let me simmer.
Its good to have people challenge us over our views, no matter where we stand.
ps. Just to not appear as a complete hipocrite, i do apologise to you Chipmonk for calling you disgusting. I was trying to get in the heads of the authors of 911myths and got a little riled. No excuse i know. But just for future reference; if i call you a b0ll0cks or a massive sham or whatever, just ignore it and let me simmer.
"A great many people think they are thinking when they are merely rearranging their prejudices."
-William James
-William James