Page 2 of 2

Posted: Thu Jul 27, 2006 1:56 pm
by Jason
chipmunk stew wrote:
Jason wrote:
chipmunk stew wrote: Welcome to the forum, Jason. Your insights are profound.

edit: and you're right, I've never had to look that one up--it was never a mystery to me...
Thanks for the welcome, my insights are as profound as yours are logical, critically thinking what you are told to think.
Enough flame-baiting. If you want to respond to criticism of the Inside Job hypothesis, feel free. Otherwise, piss off.
I have not seen any criticism worthy of a response please post some. I have looked at some but it seems fancyful and without reasonable argument.

Posted: Thu Jul 27, 2006 3:38 pm
by DeFecToR
Hey go easy Jason. You too Chippy. We are keeping this, by and large, civil so far.
Its good to have people challenge us over our views, no matter where we stand.

ps. Just to not appear as a complete hipocrite, i do apologise to you Chipmonk for calling you disgusting. I was trying to get in the heads of the authors of 911myths and got a little riled. No excuse i know. But just for future reference; if i call you a b0ll0cks or a massive sham or whatever, just ignore it and let me simmer. 8)