Documentary

For those who wish to criticise the 9/11 truth movement & key peace campaigners

Moderator: Moderators

Post Reply
eogz
Validated Poster
Validated Poster
Posts: 262
Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2007 2:07 pm

Documentary

Post by eogz »

Good day critics,

I wonder if you'd be so kind as to watch the following documentary and let us know your thoughts....

http://www.citizeninvestigationteam.com/nsa.html

Many thanks.
jesussdad
Banned
Banned
Posts: 49
Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2010 5:17 pm

Post by jesussdad »

im no critic but i had not seen that before even though ive drudged through the messy swamps of you tube so thanx for that. one word ..... conclusive .
it nicely ties in wth the pentacon and flight 77 data recorder investigation
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid ... con&emb=1#
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid ... +77+&emb=1

i tried to download it from the site links but got nothing but pop ups.
User avatar
fish5133
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 2569
Joined: Wed Sep 13, 2006 1:06 am
Location: One breath from Glory

Post by fish5133 »

we each have our own "doorway" into the rabbit hole and must keep testing it against other explanations. Have a look at some of the debunking sites to see their points of view sometimes sincere sometimes nonsense., until you find the evidence that you will remain unshaken on. For me after accepting the collapse of the towers and WTC7 were not the result of just a plane and fire then all things become possible for Pentagon and Shanksville.
Even amongst 9/11 truthers of differing positions e.g. No Planes, Dustification, Thermite the concensus is that the Towers did not collapse just because of plane and ensuing fire.
JO911B.
"for we wrestle not against flesh and blood but against principalities, against powers, against rulers of the darkness of this world, against wicked spirits in high places " Eph.6 v 12
jesussdad
Banned
Banned
Posts: 49
Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2010 5:17 pm

Post by jesussdad »

indeed fish . ive watched this effort but feel its rather weak
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LkKR3Vg6d14[/youtube]

brokenstyx seems shady .
bill withers
Banned
Banned
Posts: 7
Joined: Wed Oct 06, 2010 4:14 pm

Re: Documentary

Post by bill withers »

eogz wrote:Good day critics,

I wonder if you'd be so kind as to watch the following documentary and let us know your thoughts....

http://www.citizeninvestigationteam.com/nsa.html

Many thanks.
Yup watched it all, went to their website, find it a bit silly.

I think it's a money spinner attempt, far too much cherry picking and distortion of facts, given that 103 people witness the plane actually hit the Pentagon, and that they quote the guy Shane in the tower who witnessed the flight and use that as fact, but basically claim he is lying about seeing the plane hit the Pentagon.... pure bunkum.

The charactor assasination, and confusion of the Taxi driver- now a old man, and the placing of the camera starting a conversation about something (possibly his interest in david ike), and proving it as him being in on it. Nope, don't buy it. Anyone that cherry picks, basically has a therory that they then go on to "prove" discount any evidence which contradicts their assertations like with this guy:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ISwWfCGy ... re=related


They charge $1000 for 500 dvd's on their website, and they are cashing in on the loose $hange phenonemon, and it's just as bad in it's deception.

That said, it's a well made, very engaging piece of woo, that to anyone who stumbles across it, without researching it's claims, will seem very convincing - which is a shame.

To the poster above who charactor assainates brokenstyx who made the vid showing how CIT is bunk by saying "he is shady" well that's in tradition of CIT. at least come up with a rebuttal of what he has said, I thought it was good.

I mean come on guys! they fly planes into wtc 1 and 2, but decide that they are gonna do a flyover of the pentagon, and missile it, or bomb it, with all the risks involved of a camcorder or photo of it? Just hit the pentagon with the plane already!

They provide 1 flyover thoery witness, who is taken well out of context, and dismiss loads of stuff that contradicts their theory.

nope.
Post Reply