9/11, 7/7, Covid-1984 & the War on Freedom

ARCHITECTS & ENGINEERS FOR 9/11 TRUTH HIT THE AMERICAN MAINSTREAM

25. Sep, 2010

“All truths are easy to understand once they are discovered;
the point is to discover them”
Galileo Galilei(1564 – 1642)
Veterans Today

Nobody in his right mind, nobody with the least critical thinking could possibly buy into the 9/11 official story of the reason why the world trade center towers collapsed – at free fall speed- like a house of cards into their basements in just few seconds- WTC building 7 collapsed in exactly 6.5 seconds. Something only very precise demolition can accomplish, something which takes days if not weeks to prepare.

Whoever planned the 9/11 operation and whoever managed to fool the masses of terrorized people and tricked them into believing that al Qa`ida and its members of Afghanistan cave dwellers pulled this thing off did not consider that scientists and trained specialists would be the ones to finally expose the conspiracy and unravel 9/11 mystery.

In a previous post by the title “Danish scientist breaks the 9/11 culture of silence” We explained why professor Neil Harrits– a Danish professor of chemistry- believed the two airplanes- impacts did not cause the towers to collapse. And according to a newly published scientific article, researchers found Nano-Thermite explosive in the rubble of WTC collapsed buildings that couldn’t have come from the planes. They believe large amounts of explosives were placed in the buildings in advance.

Niels Harrit and eight other researchers conclude in this article that it was Nano-Thermite that caused these buildings to collapse.

Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth

Richard Gage, AIA, Founder of Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth (AE911Truth) with former Senator Gravel, held a press conference Presenting Findings on September 9, 2010 at National Press Club, Washington, D.C.

They presented the group’s findings and called for a new investigation into the destruction of the 3 World Trade Center skyscrapers on 9/11.

Their findings are based on the following scientific observations and Hard Evidence of Explosive Demolition of the WTC towers.

As seen in this revealing photo, the Twin Towers’ destruction exhibited all of the characteristics of destruction by explosives:

1. Destruction proceeds through the path of greatest resistance at nearly free-fall acceleration
2. Improbable symmetry of debris distribution
3. Extremely rapid onset of destruction
4. Over 100 first responders reported explosions and flashes
5. Multi-ton steel sections ejected laterally
6. Mid-air pulverization of 90,000 tons of concrete & metal decking
7. Massive volume of expanding pyroclastic-like clouds
8. 1200-foot-dia. debris field: no “pancaked” floors found
9. Isolated explosive ejections 20 – 40 stories below demolition front
10. Total building destruction: dismemberment of steel frame
11. Several tons of molten metal found under all 3 high-rises
12. Evidence of thermite incendiaries found by FEMA in steel samples
13. Evidence of explosives found in dust samples
14. No precedent for steel-framed high-rise collapse due to fire

And exhibited none of the characteristics of destruction by fire, i.e.

1. Slow onset with large visible deformations
2. Asymmetrical collapse which follows the path of least resistance (laws of conservation of momentum would cause a falling, intact, from the point of plane impact, to the side most damaged by the fires)
3. Evidence of fire temperatures capable of softening steel
4. High-rise buildings with much larger, hotter, and longer lasting fires have never “collapsed”

WTC Building #7, a 47-story high-rise not hit by an airplane, exhibited all the characteristics of classic controlled demolition with explosives:

1. Rapid onset of “collapse”

2. Sounds of explosions at ground floor – a second before the building’s destruction

3.Symmetrical “structural failure” — through the path of greatest resistance — at free-fall acceleration

4. Imploded, collapsing completely, and landed in its own footprint

5. Massive volume of expanding pyroclastic dust clouds

6. Expert corroboration from the top European Controlled Demolition professional

7. Fore-knowledge of “collapse” by media, NYPD, FDNY

In the the aftermath of WTC7?s destruction, strong evidence of demolition using incendary devices was discovered:

8. FEMA finds rapid oxidation and intergranular melting on structural steel samples

9. Several tons of molten metal reported by numerous highly-qualified witnesses

10. Chemical signature of thermite (high tech incendiary) found in solidified molten metal, and dust samples

WTC7 exhibited none of the characteristics of destruction by fire, i.e.

1. Slow onset with large visible deformations

2. Asymmetrical collapse which follows the path of least resistance (laws of conservation of momentum would cause a falling, to the side most damaged by the fires)

3. Evidence of fire temperatures capable of softening steel

4. High-rise buildings with much larger, hotter, and longer lasting fires have never “collapsed”.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0iQgjFdwvN0&[/youtube]
YouTube – Veterans Today -Richard Gage, AIA, Founder of Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth

Who is this alleged slithy lizard anyway - neither the engineer nor the bereaved father in this interview surely? I suppose it must be Fox News.

item8 wrote:He has NOT seen the light. He always knew the truth. He is a rat leaving the sinking ship and trying to save his own skin before the inevitable retribution begins. He is guilty of treason and should not be allowed to escape the consequences of his years of anti 9/11 truth propaganda. He and his kind deserve the same fate as Lord Haw Haw.

Wakeymedia wrote: Hold the line, we'll get the basta*ds for this yet.

GodSaveTheTeam wrote:There's a lot of talk about how this is some kind of psyop. The idea being that faux news would never give this air time unless there was some kind of agenda behind it.

But, with the BuildingWhat? advert doing the rounds in the US at the moment, if they didn't give it air time people would obviously ask why and it would give credence to the fact that wtc7 is largely ignored.

If they give it airtme then it diffuses the issue.

I have to say that Rivera's personal "change of heart" does raise an eyebrow. And we must remember that faux news released the "Awlaki at the Pentagon" story just a short while before the Printer Cartridge Bomb fiasco. Which was largely pinned on Awlaki himself.

Very odd uturns from Faux News it has to be said.

Will be interesting to see their next move.

scubadiver wrote:I think the best form of revenge is a change of government and a new financial (or resource based) system without the control by the banksters.

GORDON DUFF: DEAR GERALDO RIVERA, 9/11 MURDER IS NOT A JOKE 16. Nov, 2010

BUILDINGWHAT.ORG IS ABOUT HONOR AND JUSTICE

This week, Geraldo Rivera was foiled in his attempt to “contain” the 9/11 movement, something exploding around the world. A Herald Sun poll in Australia the week before, 10,000 respondents, showed 78% support for 9/11 being an “inside job.” A reasonable estimate for Americans is likely to approach the same figure.

Fox News now “owns” 9/11 as much as they own Glen Beck. First, Judge Napolitano “outed” the phony investigation now Geraldo Rivera has taken a strong stand on the (www.buildingwhat.org) Building 7 demolition issue. If you put both shows together, they lead to the most frightening coverup in modern history and a clear evidentiary trail, one Fox News has exposed. Why, then, is the door opened and then closed again? Why are we “dancing around” as though 9/11 were a joke? When we talk Building 7 and explosions, the specific issue that Geraldo Rivera and Fox News are now ready to accept as “very possible,” we are talking murder.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SH9meDbrlP8&[/youtube]

When the relatives of the dead from Building 7 are seen on the television commercial, they are telling us, as was done on Geraldo, that their family members died in explosions that were purposefully set. As there is more than “probable” cause that the explosions that killed so many were purposeful and extremely criminal, real terrorism, real murder and we can easily find who is responsible, why are we “dancing around?”

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=izGxf-lHWi4&[/youtube]

When Rivera accuses demonstrators of being “nut jobs” two years ago, he is showing his own ignorance. He believes, as he is saying now, that since qualified engineers are now doubting the official explanation, anyone demonstrating “now” is not a “nut job” at all. What the ignorant narcissist fool Rivera is missing, of course, is that when the demonstrators he attack were out there, two years ago, engineers and architects had long ago come forward, not two years ago, not five years ago. To Rivera, there is no reality, there is no truth, until “he” learns of it. Where in hell do we find people like this.

I keep seeing him unearthing the secret “Al Capone” bunker in Chicago. This is the same Geraldo Rivera.

AMBUSH ATTEMPT BY RIVERA

Rivera tried, during the show, to “sucker” the parent of a Building 7 murder victim into a 2 minute discussion of 9/11 as an “inside job” knowing quite well he would be able to get a quick attack in. Rivera was outwitted as the video shows, cut off at the legs. Why would Rivera do this?

When we say “inside job,” we mean the US government but also we mean Israel. It was an Israeli team that was arrested filming 9/11, openly admitting they knew in advance. Israel also admitted they knew about the 1982 Beirut bombing that killed 224 Marines. With “dual citizens” involved in planning the “war on terror,” surrounding and advising Bush and Cheney every step of the way, it is impossible to say “inside job” without saying “Israel did it” as we hear from Dr. Alan Sabrosky and journalist Alan Hart.

It was easy to see where Rivera was heading, you could hear the hate in his voice when he played the clip from two years ago. Rivera owes them an apology but failed to see the irony of his own confusion. Of course, Rivera could have an agenda.

WHY BUILDING 7?

Mr. Rivera leaves more than a few things out of his story. The Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth, the group he is now behind, don’t just say Building 7 was a “mystery,” they say all three buildings were engineering impossibilities, even or perhaps “especially” those hit by planes. The buildings were constructed to withstand, with no structural damage whatsoever, hits by larger planes than these. When we say “no structural damage” we aren’t talking about them falling down.

Similarly, the Pentagon attack is, is possible, even more obvious than Building 7. The reason building 7 is chosen is because there is enough hard evidence already to make arrests, enough evidence for criminal convictions for premeditated murder. The case for Building 7 is there and those who could be arrested would shock the world. This is why every move for any inquiry is crushed. It would bring the world to a stop, for a brief second at least.

It would also leave the world better, safer and cleaner. Nobody at Fox News wants that.

BRITAIN ‘COMING APART’ TOO, 7/7 COVERUP NOT HOLDING WATER

On July 7, 2005, bombs went off all over London. An exhaustive Wikipedia article, carefully orchestrating the “spin,” blaming the bombings on Osama bin Laden, now known to have been dead for 4 years at the time, is an interesting read. However, the families of those who died have been screaming “false flag” all along. The timing, when Tony Blair was facing an election and a no-confidence vote on Iraq, was curious. Some aspects of the bombing, in particular, the one bus which seemed purposefully rerouted, have millions of Britons up in arms.

Were there not “theories” that contradict the cursory and seemingly “planned in advance” investigation, the violent reactions by the government to requests for a new investigation have, in themselves, brought many to questioning the official story. As with 9/11, it isn’t that Geraldo Rivera is reassessing his opinions, it is that he is doing it nearly a decade later, after having every bit of evidence, he is now claiming he has just learned about what was at his disposal for years and years. Rivera, heaven forbid, is a journalist, and has personally heard the engineering doubts about 9/11 dozens of times for many years.

Is Rivera more an actor? Rodeo clown?

FOX IS NOT NEWS, FOX IS ISRAEL AND RIVERA IS AN ISRAELI

Covering up 9/11 is key to Israel’s foreign policy. If they are blamed, America will turn on them as journalist Franklin Lamb warned this week. Rivera, an Israeli citizen, has reason to have an agenda especially since he works for Fox News, owned by Rupert Murdoch, another Israeli citizen. Rivera? Murdoch?

Simply put, if 9/11 was an inside job, Israel was there every step of the way and so was Fox News. Now they are trying to “spin” the story, control it, make murder a joke.

Murder is not a joke. Building 7 was demolished with explosives placed there long before 9/11. Rivera admits as much. Watch the video.

This is premeditated murder. Last time we checked, this was a crime in New York City.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TzC3QI8JenU&[/youtube]

GodSaveTheTeam wrote:There's a lot of talk about how this is some kind of psyop. The idea being that faux news would never give this air time unless there was some kind of agenda behind it.

item8 wrote:Another snake slithers from under his rock. After Chomsky it looks like they are getting scared of being caught siding with the liars.

What in your book IS a cause for celebration then?

Wakeymedia wrote:Xmasdale - get the basta*ds means getting the basta*ds into the dock, into an international warcrimes tribunal and weeding out and exposing these black-ops Fascist elements that have been entrenched for a long time.

It also means life without parole for the lot of 'em.

Nothing more, nothing less.

"When will we ever learn"?

Learn what, oh wise one?

I very much doubt that Rivera or Chomsky had anything to do with the planning and execution of the 9/11 attacks.

xmasdale wrote:But now, and this is too much, another left-wing gatekeeper has turned. George Galloway interviewed Ian Henshall of Reinvestigte 9/11 on his Talksport radio show last Friday night. At the end of the interview Galloway said he did believe there should be a new inquiry into 9/11.


To me that sounds like the cue for Wakeymedia and Item 8 to call him names like "snake" and "traitor" for not having supported our cause for the last ten years. You guys had better think up some really filthy insults to welcome him to the 9/11 truth cause, otherwise people might get the impression that the 9/11 truth movement seeks to recruit supporters.

George Galloway in Montreal on November 17, 2010 stated bluntly, in
answer to a question posed by Michael Pengue of Montreal 911 Truth, that
conspiracy theories concerning 911 are madness, insane.

Here is the link on YouTube:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5748TK-biq8

This is a 4 minute video.

At no time during his conference did he come out and claim there was a
need to reinvestigate 911.

Jacques Marcille, Montreal

--
The Group owners do not necessarily agree with the views expressed in these emails.

Please post any new 9/11 or 7/7 Truth info you find, or reminders, with links, to everyone via. this email group address
uk-911-truth@googlegroups.com

To me that sounds like the cue for Wakeymedia and Item 8 to call him names like "snake" and "traitor" for not having supported our cause for the last ten years.

On March 6, 1975, the Zapruder film finally made its American TV premiere on Geraldo Rivera's talk show Good Night America. A month earlier, the film had first been shown on TV in Australia. In April, wishing to avoid the appearance of "suppression," Time Inc. returned the film and all commercial rights to Abraham Zapruder's heirs for one dollar. Since 1978, the original has been kept in "courtesy storage" under conservation-conditions at the National Archives.

item8 wrote:
I don't need a cue to call filth names. They are not, and will never be, "supporters" of 9/11 truth or any other truth. Any people with a high public profile who have spent almost a decade obstructing the 9/11 truth movement are not converts. They are habitual self-serving liars who see that they might get their comeuppance if they don't change sides. Disgusting snakes and traitors. Just what do you think has occurred to give Galloway his sudden flash of light?

xmasdale wrote:When did you become aware of it?