dont bite my head off....

stav · Post by **stav** » Fri Feb 02, 2007 3:13 pm

hi peeps dont bite my head off as i am not a no planer i am just posting interesting info for discussion.
this is a video of augmented reality - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1L6ee0KAdXA

now just suppose, the hit on the second tower the one where the "nose" come out the otherside of the building.
if it were a missile, and it had this type of cloaking over it which can produce shadows and noise.
would it explain the nose coming out actually being a missile, and the shape of plane inside of building was just well placed explosives.

not looking for arguments just thought that if the technology is there now for commercial use, do people think that militarys use is probably 10years ahead. would it explain the mysterious nose coming out other side of building.

fixuplooksharp · Post by **fixuplooksharp** » Fri Feb 02, 2007 3:20 pm

if you are the same stav from webcameron, dont you dare go and post this * there. They hate us already and have changed their system because of us.

I hope i didnt bite too hard! heh

IronSnot · Post by **IronSnot** » Fri Feb 02, 2007 3:31 pm

Stav, you need to jump ship.

telecasterisation · Post by **telecasterisation** » Fri Feb 02, 2007 4:03 pm

Most areas of 9/11 have their controversial aspects and the emerging 'nosecone' is definitely one of them.

Personally, I believe the nosecone has been added post-event, some videos show it, others do not. I cannot believe that this would be part of the holographic visual concoction - some bright 'hologrammer' decided 'Wouldn't it be cool if the plane's nosecone shot out of the other side of the building!'.

If this was planned in such a way as to fool the world into believing real planes were used, even simpletons like 'us' can appreciate the physical barriers negating such an occurence taking place in the real world. The dimensions of the aircraft, the steel and concrete all say 'no way' that the aircraft could emerge as it entered.

The nosecone is digitally faked post-event.

stav · Post by **stav** » Fri Feb 02, 2007 4:54 pm

the one and the same fixup. and no i wouldn't post it there. and by the way how have they changed anything there, i have been using it exactly the same way for a while now. bite not bad.
ironsnot why do i have to jump ship, if you read my post i say i am a not a NPer. thats why i use the word suppose, this is hypertheticle incase the nose isn't an added feature after the event. would this technology explain it.
tele can you direct me to footage of where there is no nose coming out the other side coz i haven't seen it. i am sure that it has been added but as i have not seen any footage, i cant rule it out as a mystery.
the reason i say missile is because they used a missile at the pentagon, why are peole so quick to judge on things without proper investigation. because if it turns out that the nose cone footage was taken from a live feed and not added. then it can in no way be a plane.